arXiv subjects

Nai-Hui Chia

Publications and source records attributed to Nai-Hui Chia.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Complexity Theory for Quantum Promise Problems

We begin by establishing structural results for several fundamental quantum complexity classes: p/mBQP, p/mQ(C)MA, $\text{p/mQSZK}_{\text{hv}}$, p/mQIP, p/mBQP/qpoly, p/mBQP/poly, and p/mPSPACE. This includes identifying complete problems, as well as proving containment and separation results among these classes. Here, p/mC denotes the corresponding quantum promise complexity class with pure (p) or mixed (m) quantum input states for any classical complexity class C. Surprisingly, our findings uncover relationships that diverge from their classical analogues -- specifically, we show unconditionally that p/mQIP$\neq$p/mPSPACE and p/mBQP/qpoly$\neq$p/mBQP/poly. This starkly contrasts the classical setting, where QIP$=$PSPACE and separations such as BQP/qpoly$\neq$BQP/poly are only known relative to oracles. More interestingly, these separation results further connected to the topic of for both quantum property testing and unitary synthesis. This new framework has numerous applications in quantum cryptography, particularly in the contexts of Microcrypt. We provide a better characterization of its primitives; for example, we show that OWSG and PRS can be broken by a p/mQCMA oracle, leading to a natural quantum analogue of Impagliazzo's five worlds by substituting the classical complexity classes in Pessiland, Heuristica, and Algorithmica with mBQP and mQCMA. Moreover, we establish the relativization barrier for proving the existence of EFI, noting that no such barrier currently exists within traditional complexity theory.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Fine-Grained Complexity for Quantum Problems from Size-Preserving Circuit-to-Hamiltonian Constructions

The local Hamiltonian (LH) problem is the canonical $\mathsf{QMA}$-complete problem introduced by Kitaev. In this paper, we show its hardness in a very strong sense: we show that the 3-local Hamiltonian problem on $n$ qubits cannot be solved classically in time $O(2^{(1-\varepsilon)n})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$ under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), and cannot be solved quantumly in time $O(2^{(1-\varepsilon)n/2})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$ under the Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (QSETH). These lower bounds give evidence that the currently known classical and quantum algorithms for LH cannot be significantly improved. Furthermore, we are able to demonstrate fine-grained complexity lower bounds for approximating the quantum partition function (QPF) with an arbitrary constant relative error. Approximating QPF with relative error is known to be equivalent to approximately counting the dimension of the solution subspace of $\mathsf{QMA}$ problems. We show the SETH and QSETH hardness to estimate QPF with constant relative error. We then provide a quantum algorithm that runs in $O(\sqrt{2^n})$ time for an arbitrary $1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ relative error, matching our lower bounds and improving the state-of-the-art algorithm by Bravyi, Chowdhury, Gosset, and Wocjan (Nature Physics 2022) in the low-temperature regime. To prove our fine-grained lower bounds, we introduce the first size-preserving circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction that encodes the computation of a $T$-time quantum circuit acting on $N$ qubits into a $(d+1)$-local Hamiltonian acting on $N+O(T^{1/d})$ qubits. This improves the standard construction based on the unary clock, which uses $N+O(T)$ qubits.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Efficient Matrix Product State Learning in Logarithmic Depth

Learning the closest matrix product state (MPS) representation of a quantum state enables useful tools for quantum machine learning and analysis of complex quantum systems. In this work, we study the problem of learning MPS in the following setting: given many copies of an input MPS, the task is to recover a classical description of the state. The best known polynomial-time algorithm, introduced by [LCLP10, CPF+10], requires linear circuit depth and $\widetilde O(n^5)$ samples, and has seen no improvement in over a decade. These costs, neither known to be optimal, renders existing algorithms impractical for near-term quantum devices with limited resources. We introduce parallel disentangling algorithms for MPS learning. For exact MPS learning, our algorithm runs in polynomial time and uses circuit depth $O(\log n)$ and sample complexity $\widetilde O(n^3)$, improving both the depth and the dependence on the system size $n$. The key idea is to exploit the bounded-rank structure of reduced states on middle blocks of an MPS and organize the disentangling operations in a tree structure. We further extend the algorithm to closest MPS learning, improving the sample complexity dependence on $n$ from $n^9$ to $n^7$ and complement the algorithms with an $Ω(n)$ product-state lower bound. We also investigate MPS learning under hardware constraints, including restricted measurements and geometric connectivity. Under the Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) assumption, we show computational hardness for learning an MPS(2) family with non-adaptive single-qubit measurements. Finally, we show that our algorithm can be implemented with depth $O(q n^{1/q})$ on a $q$-dimensional hypercubic lattice, giving an asymptotic reduction in depth. Together, our work provides a complete characterization of the quantum resources needed for efficient MPS learning.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Shadow Tomography Against Adversaries

We study single-copy shadow tomography in the adversarial robust setting, where the goal is to learn the expectation values of $M$ observables $O_1, \ldots, O_M$ with $\varepsilon$ accuracy, but $γ$-fraction of the outcomes can be arbitrarily corrupted by an adversary. We show that all non-adaptive shadow tomography algorithms must incur an error of $\varepsilon=\tildeΩ(γ\min\{\sqrt{M}, \sqrt{d}\})$ for some choice of observables, even with unlimited copies. Unfortunately, the classical shadows algorithm by [HKP20] and naive algorithms that directly measure each observable suffer even more. We design an algorithm that achieves an error of $\varepsilon=\tilde{O}(γ\max_{i\in[M]}\|O_i\|_{HS})$, which nearly matches our worst-case error lower bound for $M\ge d$ and guarantees better accuracy when the observables have stronger structure. Remarkably, the algorithm only needs $n=\frac{1}{γ^2}\log(M/δ)$ copies to achieve that error with probability at least $1-δ$, matching the sample complexity of the classical shadows algorithm that achieves the same error without corrupted measurement outcomes. Our algorithm is conceptually simple and easy to implement. Classical simulation for fidelity estimation shows that our algorithm enjoys much stronger robustness than [HKP20] under adversarial noise. Finally, based on a reduction from full-state tomography to shadow tomography, we prove that for rank $r$ states, both the near-optimal asymptotic error of $\varepsilon=\tilde{O}(γ\sqrt{r})$ and copy complexity $\tilde{O}(dr^2/\varepsilon^2)=\tilde{O}(dr/γ^2)$ can be achieved for adversarially robust state tomography, closing the large gap in [ABCL25] where optimal error can only be achieved using pseudo-polynomial number of copies in $d$.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

A Catalyst Framework for the Quantum Linear System Problem via the Proximal Point Algorithm

Solving systems of linear equations is a fundamental problem, but it can be computationally intensive for classical algorithms in high dimensions. Existing quantum algorithms can achieve exponential speedups for the quantum linear system problem (QLSP) in terms of the problem dimension, but the advantage is bottlenecked by condition number of the coefficient matrix. In this work, we propose a new quantum algorithm for QLSP inspired by the classical proximal point algorithm (PPA). Our proposed method can be viewed as a meta-algorithm that allows inverting a modified matrix via an existing \texttt{QLSP\_solver}, thereby directly approximating the solution vector instead of approximating the inverse of the coefficient matrix. By carefully choosing the step size $η$, the proposed algorithm can effectively precondition the linear system to mitigate the dependence on condition numbers that hindered the applicability of previous approaches. Importantly, this is the first iterative framework for QLSP where a tunable parameter $η$ and initialization $x_0$ allows controlling the trade-off between the runtime and approximation error.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

A Cryptographic Perspective on the Verifiability of Quantum Advantage

In recent years, achieving verifiable quantum advantage on a NISQ device has emerged as an important open problem in quantum information. The sampling-based quantum advantages are not known to have efficient verification methods. This paper investigates the verification of quantum advantage from a cryptographic perspective. We establish a strong connection between the verifiability of quantum advantage and cryptographic and complexity primitives, including efficiently samplable, statistically far but computationally indistinguishable pairs of (mixed) quantum states ($\mathsf{EFI}$), pseudorandom states ($\mathsf{PRS}$), and variants of minimum circuit size problems ($\mathsf{MCSP}$). Specifically, we prove that a) a sampling-based quantum advantage is either verifiable or can be used to build $\mathsf{EFI}$ and even $\mathsf{PRS}$ and b) polynomial-time algorithms for a variant of $\mathsf{MCSP}$ would imply efficient verification of quantum advantages. Our work shows that the quest for verifiable quantum advantages may lead to applications of quantum cryptography, and the construction of quantum primitives can provide new insights into the verifiability of quantum advantages.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

3-Local Hamiltonian Problem and Constant Relative Error Quantum Partition Function Approximation: $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}})$ Algorithm Is Nearly Optimal under QSETH

We investigate the computational complexity of the Local Hamiltonian (LH) problem and the approximation of the Quantum Partition Function (QPF), two central problems in quantum many-body physics and quantum complexity theory. Both problems are known to be QMA-hard, and under the widely believed assumption that $\mathsf{BQP} \neq \mathsf{QMA}$, no efficient quantum algorithm exits. The best known quantum algorithm for LH runs in $O\bigl(2^{\frac{n}{2}(1 - o(1))}\bigr)$ time, while for QPF, the state-of-the-art algorithm achieves relative error $δ$ in $O^\ast\bigl(\frac{1}δ\sqrt{\frac{2^n}{Z}}\bigr)$ time, where $Z$ denotes the value of the partition function. A nature open question is whether more efficient algorithms exist for both problems. In this work, we establish tight conditional lower bounds showing that these algorithms are nearly optimal. Under the plausible Quantum Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (QSETH), we prove that no quantum algorithm can solve either LH or approximate QPF significantly faster than $O(2^{n/2})$, even for 3-local Hamiltonians. In particular, we show: 1) 3-local LH cannot be solved in time $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}(1-\varepsilon)})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ under QSETH; 2) 3-local QPF cannot be approximated up to any constant relative error in $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}(1-\varepsilon)})$ time for any $\varepsilon > 0$ under QSETH; and 3) we present a quantum algorithm that approximates QPF up to relative error $1/2 + 1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ in $O^\ast(2^{n/2})$ time, matching our conditional lower bound. Notably, our results provide the first fine-grained lower bounds for both LH and QPF with fixed locality. This stands in sharp contrast to QSETH and the trivial fine-grained lower bounds for LH, where the locality of the SAT instance and the Hamiltonian depends on the parameter $\varepsilon$ in the $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}(1-\varepsilon)})$ running time.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Quantum State Learning Implies Circuit Lower Bounds

We establish connections between state tomography, pseudorandomness, quantum state synthesis, and circuit lower bounds. In particular, let $\mathfrak{C}$ be a family of non-uniform quantum circuits of polynomial size and suppose that there exists an algorithm that, given copies of $|ψ\rangle$, distinguishes whether $|ψ\rangle$ is produced by $\mathfrak{C}$ or is Haar random, promised one of these is the case. For arbitrary fixed constant $c$, we show that if the algorithm uses at most $O(2^{n^c})$ time and $2^{n^{0.99}}$ samples then $\mathsf{stateBQE} \not\subset \mathsf{state}\mathfrak{C}$. Here $\mathsf{stateBQE} := \mathsf{stateBQTIME}[2^{O(n)}]$ and $\mathsf{state}\mathfrak{C}$ are state synthesis complexity classes as introduced by Rosenthal and Yuen (ITCS 2022), which capture problems with classical inputs but quantum output. Note that efficient tomography implies a similarly efficient distinguishing algorithm against Haar random states, even for nearly exponential-time algorithms. Because every state produced by a polynomial-size circuit can be learned with $2^{O(n)}$ samples and time, or $O(n^{ω(1)})$ samples and $2^{O(n^{ω(1)})}$ time, we show that even slightly non-trivial quantum state tomography algorithms would lead to new statements about quantum state synthesis. Finally, a slight modification of our proof shows that distinguishing algorithms for quantum states can imply circuit lower bounds for decision problems as well. This help sheds light on why time-efficient tomography algorithms for non-uniform quantum circuit classes has only had limited and partial progress. Our work parallels results by Arunachalam et al. (FOCS 2021) that revealed a similar connection between quantum learning of Boolean functions and circuit lower bounds for classical circuit classes, but modified for the purposes of state tomography and state synthesis.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Adversarially robust quantum state learning and testing

Quantum state learning is a fundamental problem in physics and computer science. As near-term quantum devices are error-prone, it is important to design error-resistant algorithms. Apart from device errors, other unexpected factors could also affect the algorithm, such as careless human read-out error, or even a malicious hacker deliberately altering the measurement results. Thus, we want our algorithm to work even in the worst case when things go against our favor. We consider the practical setting of single-copy measurements and propose the $γ$-adversarial corruption model where an imaginary adversary can arbitrarily change $γ$-fraction of the measurement outcomes. This is stronger than the $γ$-bounded SPAM noise model, where the post-measurement state changes by at most $γ$ in trace distance. Under our stronger model of corruption, we design an algorithm using non-adaptive measurements that can learn an unknown rank-$r$ state up to $\tilde{O}(γ\sqrt{r})$ in trace distance, provided that the number of copies is sufficiently large. We further prove an information-theoretic lower bound of $Ω(γ\sqrt{r})$ for non-adaptive measurements, demonstrating the optimality of our algorithm. Our upper and lower bounds also hold for quantum state testing, where the goal is to test whether an unknown state is equal to a given state or far from it. Our results are intriguingly optimistic and pessimistic at the same time. For general states, the error is dimension-dependent and $γ\sqrt{d}$ in the worst case, meaning that only corrupting a very small fraction ($1/\sqrt{d}$) of the outcomes could totally destroy any non-adaptive learning algorithm. However, for constant-rank states that are useful in many quantum algorithms, it is possible to achieve dimension-independent error, even in the worst-case adversarial setting.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

The Black-Box Simulation Barrier Persists in a Fully Quantum World

Zero-Knowledge (ZK) protocols have been intensely studied due to their fundamental importance and versatility. However, quantum information's inherent differences significantly alter the landscape, necessitating a re-examination of ZK designs. A crucial aspect is round complexity, linked to $\textit{simulation}$, which forms the foundation of ZK definition and security proofs. In the $\textit{post-quantum}$ setting, where honest parties and channels are classical but adversaries quantum, Chia et al. [FOCS'21] showed constant-round $\textit{black-box-simulatable}$ ZK arguments (BBZK) for $\mathbf{NP}$ are impossible unless $\mathbf{NP} \subseteq \mathbf{BQP}$. But this problem remains open when all parties and communication are quantum. Indeed, this problem interests the broader theory of quantum computing. Investigating how quantum power alters tasks like the $\textit{unconditional}$ security of QKD and incorporating OT in MiniQCrypt has been crucial. Moreover, quantum communication has enabled round compression for commitments and interactive arguments. Along this line, understanding if quantum computing could fundamentally change ZK protocols is vital. We resolved this problem by proving that only languages in $\mathbf{BQP}$ admit constant-round $\textit{fully-quantum}$ BBZK. This result holds significant implications. Firstly, it illuminates the nature of quantum zero-knowledge and provides valuable insights for designing future protocols in the quantum realm. Secondly, it relates ZK round complexity with the intriguing problem of $\mathbf{BQP}$ vs $\mathbf{QMA}$, which is out of the reach of previous analogue impossibility results in the classical or post-quantum setting. Lastly, it justifies the need for the $\textit{non-black-box}$ simulation techniques or the relaxed security notions employed in existing constant-round fully-quantum BBZK protocols.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2024

Oracle Separation between Noisy Quantum Polynomial Time and the Polynomial Hierarchy

This work investigates the oracle separation between the physically motivated complexity class of noisy quantum circuits, inspired by definitions such as those presented by Chen, Cotler, Huang, and Li (2022). We establish that with a constant error rate, separation can be achieved in terms of NP. When the error rate is $Ω(\log n/n)$, we can extend this result to the separation of PH. Notably, our oracles, in all separations, do not necessitate error correction schemes or fault tolerance, as all quantum circuits are of constant depth. This indicates that even quantum computers with minor errors, without error correction, may surpass classical complexity classes under various scenarios and assumptions. We also explore various common noise settings and present new classical hardness results, generalizing those found in studies by Raz and Tal (2022) and Bassirian, Bouland, Fefferman, Gunn, and Tal (2021), which are of independent interest.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2024

Efficient learning of $t$-doped stabilizer states with single-copy measurements

One of the primary objectives in the field of quantum state learning is to develop algorithms that are time-efficient for learning states generated from quantum circuits. Earlier investigations have demonstrated time-efficient algorithms for states generated from Clifford circuits with at most $\log(n)$ non-Clifford gates. However, these algorithms necessitate multi-copy measurements, posing implementation challenges in the near term due to the requisite quantum memory. On the contrary, using solely single-qubit measurements in the computational basis is insufficient in learning even the output distribution of a Clifford circuit with one additional $T$ gate under reasonable post-quantum cryptographic assumptions. In this work, we introduce an efficient quantum algorithm that employs only nonadaptive single-copy measurement to learn states produced by Clifford circuits with a maximum of $O(\log n)$ non-Clifford gates, filling a gap between the previous positive and negative results.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Post-Quantum Simulatable Extraction with Minimal Assumptions: Black-Box and Constant-Round

From the minimal assumption of post-quantum semi-honest oblivious transfers, we build the first $ε$-simulatable two-party computation (2PC) against quantum polynomial-time (QPT) adversaries that is both constant-round and black-box (for both the construction and security reduction). A recent work by Chia, Chung, Liu, and Yamakawa (FOCS'21) shows that post-quantum 2PC with standard simulation-based security is impossible in constant rounds, unless either $\mathbf{NP} \subseteq \mathbf{BQP}$ or relying on non-black-box simulation. The $ε$-simulatability we target is a relaxation of the standard simulation-based security that allows for an arbitrarily small noticeable simulation error $ε$. Moreover, when quantum communication is allowed, we can further weaken the assumption to post-quantum secure one-way functions (PQ-OWFs), while maintaining the constant-round and black-box property. Our techniques also yield the following set of constant-round and black-box two-party protocols secure against QPT adversaries, only assuming black-box access to PQ-OWFs: - extractable commitments for which the extractor is also an $ε$-simulator; - $ε$-zero-knowledge commit-and-prove whose commit stage is extractable with $ε$-simulation; - $ε$-simulatable coin-flipping; - $ε$-zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge for $\mathbf{NP}$ for which the knowledge extractor is also an $ε$-simulator; - $ε$-zero-knowledge arguments for $\mathbf{QMA}$. At the heart of the above results is a black-box extraction lemma showing how to efficiently extract secrets from QPT adversaries while disturbing their quantum state in a controllable manner, i.e., achieving $ε$-simulatability of the post-extraction state of the adversary.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2023

A Black-Box Approach to Post-Quantum Zero-Knowledge in Constant Rounds

In a recent seminal work, Bitansky and Shmueli (STOC '20) gave the first construction of a constant round zero-knowledge argument for NP secure against quantum attacks. However, their construction has several drawbacks compared to the classical counterparts. Specifically, their construction only achieves computational soundness, requires strong assumptions of quantum hardness of learning with errors (QLWE assumption) and the existence of quantum fully homomorphic encryption (QFHE), and relies on non-black-box simulation. In this paper, we resolve these issues at the cost of weakening the notion of zero-knowledge to what is called $ε$-zero-knowledge. Concretely, we construct the following protocols: - We construct a constant round interactive proof for NP that satisfies statistical soundness and black-box $ε$-zero-knowledge against quantum attacks assuming the existence of collapsing hash functions, which is a quantum counterpart of collision-resistant hash functions. Interestingly, this construction is just an adapted version of the classical protocol by Goldreich and Kahan (JoC '96) though the proof of $ε$-zero-knowledge property against quantum adversaries requires novel ideas. - We construct a constant round interactive argument for NP that satisfies computational soundness and black-box $ε$-zero-knowledge against quantum attacks only assuming the existence of post-quantum one-way functions. At the heart of our results is a new quantum rewinding technique that enables a simulator to extract a committed message of a malicious verifier while simulating verifier's internal state in an appropriate sense.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learning

We present an algorithmic framework for quantum-inspired classical algorithms on close-to-low-rank matrices, generalizing the series of results started by Tang's breakthrough quantum-inspired algorithm for recommendation systems [STOC'19]. Motivated by quantum linear algebra algorithms and the quantum singular value transformation (SVT) framework of Gilyén, Su, Low, and Wiebe [STOC'19], we develop classical algorithms for SVT that run in time independent of input dimension, under suitable quantum-inspired sampling assumptions. Our results give compelling evidence that in the corresponding QRAM data structure input model, quantum SVT does not yield exponential quantum speedups. Since the quantum SVT framework generalizes essentially all known techniques for quantum linear algebra, our results, combined with sampling lemmas from previous work, suffice to generalize all recent results about dequantizing quantum machine learning algorithms. In particular, our classical SVT framework recovers and often improves the dequantization results on recommendation systems, principal component analysis, supervised clustering, support vector machines, low-rank regression, and semidefinite program solving. We also give additional dequantization results on low-rank Hamiltonian simulation and discriminant analysis. Our improvements come from identifying the key feature of the quantum-inspired input model that is at the core of all prior quantum-inspired results: $\ell^2$-norm sampling can approximate matrix products in time independent of their dimension. We reduce all our main results to this fact, making our exposition concise, self-contained, and intuitive.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

On the Impossibility of General Parallel Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonian Simulation

Hamiltonian simulation is one of the most important problems in the field of quantum computing. There have been extended efforts on designing algorithms for faster simulation, and the evolution time $T$ for the simulation turns out to largely affect algorithm runtime. While there are some specific types of Hamiltonians that can be fast-forwarded, i.e., simulated within time $o(T)$, for large enough classes of Hamiltonians (e.g., all local/sparse Hamiltonians), existing simulation algorithms require running time at least linear in the evolution time $T$. On the other hand, while there exist lower bounds of $Ω(T)$ circuit size for some large classes of Hamiltonian, these lower bounds do not rule out the possibilities of Hamiltonian simulation with large but "low-depth" circuits by running things in parallel. Therefore, it is intriguing whether we can achieve fast Hamiltonian simulation with the power of parallelism. In this work, we give a negative result for the above open problem, showing that sparse Hamiltonians and (geometrically) local Hamiltonians cannot be parallelly fast-forwarded. In the oracle model, we prove that there are time-independent sparse Hamiltonians that cannot be simulated via an oracle circuit of depth $o(T)$. In the plain model, relying on the random oracle heuristic, we show that there exist time-independent local Hamiltonians and time-dependent geometrically local Hamiltonians that cannot be simulated via an oracle circuit of depth $o(T/n^c)$, where the Hamiltonians act on $n$-qubits, and $c$ is a constant.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

QMLP: An Error-Tolerant Nonlinear Quantum MLP Architecture using Parameterized Two-Qubit Gates

Despite potential quantum supremacy, state-of-the-art quantum neural networks (QNNs) suffer from low inference accuracy. First, the current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices with high error rates of 0.001 to 0.01 significantly degrade the accuracy of a QNN. Second, although recently proposed Re-Uploading Units (RUUs) introduce some non-linearity into the QNN circuits, the theory behind it is not fully understood. Furthermore, previous RUUs that repeatedly upload original data can only provide marginal accuracy improvements. Third, current QNN circuit ansatz uses fixed two-qubit gates to enforce maximum entanglement capability, making task-specific entanglement tuning impossible, resulting in poor overall performance. In this paper, we propose a Quantum Multilayer Perceptron (QMLP) architecture featured by error-tolerant input embedding, rich nonlinearity, and enhanced variational circuit ansatz with parameterized two-qubit entangling gates. Compared to prior arts, QMLP increases the inference accuracy on the 10-class MNIST dataset by 10% with 2 times fewer quantum gates and 3 times reduced parameters. Our source code is available and can be found in [1]

cs.ET↗

arXiv2022

Classical verification of quantum depth

We present two protocols for classical verification of quantum depth. Our protocols allow a purely classical verifier to distinguish devices with different quantum circuit depths even in the presence of classical computation. We show that a device with quantum circuit depth at most d will be rejected by the verifier even if the prover applies additional polynomial-time classical computation to cheat. On the other hand, the verifier accepts a device which has quantum circuit depth d' for some d'>d. In our first protocol, we introduce an additional untrusted quantum machine which shares entanglements with the target machine. Applying a robust self-test, our first protocol certifies the depth of the target machine with information theoretic security and nearly optimal separation. The protocol relies on the oracle separation problem for quantum depth by Chia, Chung and Lai [STOC 2020] and a transformation from an oracle separation problem to a two-player non-local game. Our second protocol certifies the quantum depth of a single device based on quantum hardness of learning with errors. The protocol relies on the noisy trapdoor claw-free function family and the idea of pointer chasing to force the prover to keep quantum coherence until all preceding message exchanges are completed. To our knowledge, we give the first constructions for distinguishing hybrid quantum-classical computers with different circuit depths in unrelativized models.

quant-ph↗