arXiv subjects

Naiwen Ying

Publications and source records attributed to Naiwen Ying.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Correcting nonignorable nonresponse bias in turnout estimation using callback data

Overestimation of turnout has long been an issue in election surveys, with nonresponse bias or voter overrepresentation identified as major sources of bias. However, adjusting for nonignorable nonresponse bias is substantially challenging. Based on the ANES Non-Response Follow-Up study concerning the 2020 U.S. presidential election, we investigate the role of callback data, that is, records of contact attempts in the survey course, in adjusting for nonresponse bias in the estimation of turnout. We propose a stableness of resistance assumption to account for nonignorable missingness in the outcome, which states that the impact of the missing outcome on the response propensity is stable in the first two call attempts. Under this assumption and by integrating with covariate information from the census data, we establish identifiability and develop estimation methods for turnout. Our methods produce estimates very close to the official turnout and successfully capture the trend of declining willingness to vote as response reluctance increases. This work highlights the importance of adjusting for nonignorable nonresponse bias and demonstrates the potential of widely available callback data for political surveys.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A generalized tetrad constraint for testing conditional independence given a latent variable

The tetrad constraint is widely used to test whether four observed variables are conditionally independent given a latent variable, based on the fact that if four observed variables following a linear model are mutually independent after conditioning on an unobserved variable, then products of covariances of any two different pairs of these four variables are equal. It is an important tool for discovering a latent common cause or distinguishing between alternative linear causal structures. However, the classical tetrad constraint fails in nonlinear models because the covariance of observed variables cannot capture nonlinear association. In this paper, we propose a generalized tetrad constraint, which establishes a testable implication for conditional independence given a latent variable in nonlinear and nonparametric models. In linear models, this constraint implies the classical tetrad constraint; in nonlinear models, it remains a necessary condition for conditional independence but the classical tetrad constraint no longer is. Based on this constraint, we further propose a formal test, which can control type I error and has power approaching unity under certain conditions. We illustrate the proposed approach via simulations and two real data applications on mental ability tests and on moral attitudes towards dishonesty.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Identifying the desert decision rule to assess and achieve fairness

We study fairness in decision-making when the data may encode systematic bias. Existing approaches typically impose fairness constraints while predicting the observed decision, which may itself be unfair. We propose a novel framework for characterising and addressing fairness issues by introducing the notion of desert decision, a latent variable representing the decision an individual rightfully deserves based on their actions, efforts, or abilities. This formulation shifts the prediction target from the potentially biased observed decision to the desert decision. We advocate achieving fair decision-making by predicting the desert decision and assessing unfairness by the discrepancy between desert and observed decisions. We establish nonparametric identification results under causally interpretable assumptions on the fairness of the desert decision and the unfairness mechanism of the observed decision. For estimation, we develop a sieve maximum likelihood estimator for the desert decision rule and an influence-function-based estimator for the degree of unfairness. Sensitivity analysis procedures are further proposed to assess robustness to violations of identifying assumptions. Our framework connects fairness with measurement error models, aligning predictive accuracy with fairness relative to an appropriate target, and providing a structural approach to modelling the unfairness mechanism.

stat.ME↗