Namit Chandak | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

The energy conditions and model selection in the local Universe

The four principal energy conditions (ECs) in general relativity prohibit negative energies, repulsive gravity and superluminal energy flows. One must invoke exotic matter to violate any one of these, yet $\Lambda$CDM does so quite prominently during inflation and in the epoch of dark energy dominance. In this paper, we carry out model selection between the standard model and the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ universe using a combination of HII galaxy and cosmic chronometer measurements in the local Universe, and directly compare the results to the constraints imposed by the ECs. We find that the latter cosmology is not only strongly favored by these data, with a likelihood of $\sim 92\%$ versus only $\sim 8\%$ for the former, but that its optimized fit is fully compliant with all four ECs, while $\Lambda$CDM's best fit violates the so-called strong energy condition at $z\lesssim 2$.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2026

Model selection with the Pantheon+ Type Ia SN sample

Recent discoveries, e.g., by JWST and DESI, have elevated the level of tension with inflationary $\Lambda$CDM. For example, the empirical evidence now suggests that the standard model violates at least one of the energy conditions from general relativity, which were designed to ensure that systems have positive energy, attractive gravity and non-superluminal energy flows. In this Letter, we use a recently compiled Type Ia supernova sample to examine whether $\Lambda$CDM violates the energy conditions in the local Universe, and carry out model selection with its principal competitor, the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ universe. We derive model-independent constraints on the distance modulus based on the energy conditions and compare these with the Hubble diagram predicted by both $\Lambda$CDM and $R_{\rm h}=ct$, using the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova catalog. We find that $\Lambda$CDM violates the strong energy condition over the redshift range $z \subset (0, 2)$, whereas $R_{\rm h}=ct$ satisfies all four energy constraints. At the same time, $R_{\rm h}=ct$ is favored by these data over $\Lambda$CDM with a likelihood of $\sim 89.5\%$ versus $\sim 10.5\%$. The $R_{\rm h}=ct$ model without inflation is strongly favored by the Type Ia supernova data over the currrent standard model, while simultaneously adhering to the general relativistic energy conditions at both high and low redshifts.

physics.gen-ph↗