SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Nanlin Guo

Publications and source records attributed to Nanlin Guo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Closed-Loop Molecular Design with Calibrated Deference

We present Cognitive Loop via In-Situ Optimization (CLIO), an agent that couples a continuously-updated belief-state graph with a recursive plan-then-act loop. The result is a reasoning agent that can contribute something qualitatively different, which we term \emph{calibrated deference}: the capacity to recognize when its own tools or assumptions are failing, to adapt its strategy in response, and to generate mechanistic hypotheses that guide experimental revision. We tested CLIO in a closed-loop human-AI campaign to design an aqueous organic redox flow battery (AORFB) negolyte, with CLIO leading proposal and interpretation in close partnership with chemists who synthesized, characterized, and weighed in on design choices. Across 17 candidates over three rounds, CLIO converged on a top phosphonate candidate; characterization confirmed a 130~mV improvement in redox potential over the literature baseline. Characterization then revealed unexpectedly poor electrochemical reversibility -- a regression no property predictor had flagged. CLIO generated competing mechanistic hypotheses, prioritized discriminating diagnostics, traced the failure to phosphonate-potassium ion pairing, and prescribed a sulfonate replacement. The resulting compound showed substantially improved electrochemical reversibility and maintained a 90~mV improvement in redox potential, closing the design-make-test-redesign loop.

cs.CE

Distributionally Robust Circuit Design Optimization under Variation Shifts

Due to the significant process variations, designers have to optimize the statistical performance distribution of nano-scale IC design in most cases. This problem has been investigated for decades under the formulation of stochastic optimization, which minimizes the expected value of a performance metric while assuming that the distribution of process variation is exactly given. This paper rethinks the variation-aware circuit design optimization from a new perspective. First, we discuss the variation shift problem, which means that the actual density function of process variations almost always differs from the given model and is often unknown. Consequently, we propose to formulate the variation-aware circuit design optimization as a distributionally robust optimization problem, which does not require the exact distribution of process variations. By selecting an appropriate uncertainty set for the probability density function of process variations, we solve the shift-aware circuit optimization problem using distributionally robust Bayesian optimization. This method is validated with both a photonic IC and an electronics IC. Our optimized circuits show excellent robustness against variation shifts: the optimized circuit has excellent performance under many possible distributions of process variations that differ from the given statistical model. This work has the potential to enable a new research direction and inspire subsequent research at different levels of the EDA flow under the setting of variation shift.

cs.CE