arXiv subjects

Naseem Machlovi

Publications and source records attributed to Naseem Machlovi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

A Multi-Perspective Benchmark and Moderation Model for Evaluating Safety and Adversarial Robustness

As large language models (LLMs) become deeply embedded in daily life, the urgent need for safer moderation systems that distinguish between naive and harmful requests while upholding appropriate censorship boundaries has never been greater. While existing LLMs can detect dangerous or unsafe content, they often struggle with nuanced cases such as implicit offensiveness, subtle gender and racial biases, and jailbreak prompts, due to the subjective and context-dependent nature of these issues. Furthermore, their heavy reliance on training data can reinforce societal biases, resulting in inconsistent and ethically problematic outputs. To address these challenges, we introduce GuardEval, a unified multi-perspective benchmark dataset designed for both training and evaluation, containing 106 fine-grained categories spanning human emotions, offensive and hateful language, gender and racial bias, and broader safety concerns. We also present GemmaGuard (GGuard), a Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA), fine-tuned version of Gemma3-12B trained on GuardEval, to assess content moderation with fine-grained labels. Our evaluation shows that GGuard achieves a macro F1 score of 0.832, substantially outperforming leading moderation models, including OpenAI Moderator (0.64) and Llama Guard (0.61). We show that multi-perspective, human-centered safety benchmarks are critical for mitigating inconsistent moderation decisions. GuardEval and GGuard together demonstrate that diverse, representative data materially improve safety, and adversarial robustness on complex, borderline cases.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Towards Safer AI Moderation: Evaluating LLM Moderators Through a Unified Benchmark Dataset and Advocating a Human-First Approach

As AI systems become more integrated into daily life, the need for safer and more reliable moderation has never been greater. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, surpassing earlier models in complexity and performance. Their evaluation across diverse tasks has consistently showcased their potential, enabling the development of adaptive and personalized agents. However, despite these advancements, LLMs remain prone to errors, particularly in areas requiring nuanced moral reasoning. They struggle with detecting implicit hate, offensive language, and gender biases due to the subjective and context-dependent nature of these issues. Moreover, their reliance on training data can inadvertently reinforce societal biases, leading to inconsistencies and ethical concerns in their outputs. To explore the limitations of LLMs in this role, we developed an experimental framework based on state-of-the-art (SOTA) models to assess human emotions and offensive behaviors. The framework introduces a unified benchmark dataset encompassing 49 distinct categories spanning the wide spectrum of human emotions, offensive and hateful text, and gender and racial biases. Furthermore, we introduced SafePhi, a QLoRA fine-tuned version of Phi-4, adapting diverse ethical contexts and outperforming benchmark moderators by achieving a Macro F1 score of 0.89, where OpenAI Moderator and Llama Guard score 0.77 and 0.74, respectively. This research also highlights the critical domains where LLM moderators consistently underperformed, pressing the need to incorporate more heterogeneous and representative data with human-in-the-loop, for better model robustness and explainability.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

Distributed Quantum Learning with co-Management in a Multi-tenant Quantum System

The rapid advancement of quantum computing has pushed classical designs into the quantum domain, breaking physical boundaries for computing-intensive and data-hungry applications. Given its immense potential, quantum-based computing systems have attracted increasing attention with the hope that some systems may provide a quantum speedup. For example, variational quantum algorithms have been proposed for quantum neural networks to train deep learning models on qubits, achieving promising results. Existing quantum learning architectures and systems rely on single, monolithic quantum machines with abundant and stable resources, such as qubits. However, fabricating a large, monolithic quantum device is considerably more challenging than producing an array of smaller devices. In this paper, we investigate a distributed quantum system that combines multiple quantum machines into a unified system. We propose DQuLearn, which divides a quantum learning task into multiple subtasks. Each subtask can be executed distributively on individual quantum machines, with the results looping back to classical machines for subsequent training iterations. Additionally, our system supports multiple concurrent clients and dynamically manages their circuits according to the runtime status of quantum workers. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that DQuLearn achieves similar accuracies with significant runtime reduction, by up to 68.7% and an increase per-second circuit processing speed, by up to 3.99 times, in a 4-worker multi-tenant setting.

cs.DC↗