Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Nasrin Soltankhah

Publications and source records attributed to Nasrin Soltankhah.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

On total dominating sets in graphs

A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G(V,E)$ is called a dominating set if every vertex $v\in V$ is either an element of $S$ or is adjacent to an element of $S$. A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G(V,E)$ is called a total dominating set if every vertex $v\in V$ is adjacent to an element of $S$. The domination number of a graph $G$ denoted by $γ(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in $G$. Respectively the total domination number of a graph $G$ denoted by $γ_t(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set in $G$. An upper bound for $γ_t(G)$ which has been achieved by Cockayne and et al. in $\cite{coc}$ is: for any graph $G$ with no isolated vertex and maximum degree $Δ(G)$ and $n$ vertices, $γ_t(G)\leq n-Δ(G)+1$. Here we characterize bipartite graphs and trees which achieve this upper bound. Further we present some another upper and lower bounds for $γ_t(G)$. Also, for circular complete graphs, we determine the value of $γ_t(G)$.

math.CO↗

On the non-existence of some Steiner $t$-$(v,k)$ trades of certain volumes

Mahmoodian and Soltankhah $\cite{MMS}$ conjectured that there does not exist any $t$-$(v,k)$ trade of volume $s_{i}< s <s_{i+1}$, where $s_{i}=2^{t+1}-2^{t-i}, i=0,1,..., t-1$. Also they showed that the conjecture is true for $i=0$. In this paper we prove the correctness of this conjecture for Steiner trades.

math.CO↗

Constructing regular graphs with smallest defining number

In a given graph $G$, a set $S$ of vertices with an assignment of colors is a {\sf defining set of the vertex coloring of $G$}, if there exists a unique extension of the colors of $S$ to a $\Cchi(G)$-coloring of the vertices of $G$. A defining set with minimum cardinality is called a {\sf smallest defining set} (of vertex coloring) and its cardinality, the {\sf defining number}, is denoted by $d(G, \Cchi)$. Let $ d(n, r, \Cchi = k)$ be the smallest defining number of all $r$-regular $k$-chromatic graphs with $n$ vertices. Mahmoodian et. al \cite{rkgraph} proved that, for a given $k$ and for all $n \geq 3k$, if $r \geq 2(k-1)$ then $d(n, r, \Cchi = k)=k-1$. In this paper we show that for a given $k$ and for all $n < 3k$ and $r\geq 2(k-1)$, $d(n, r, \Cchi=k)=k-1$.

math.CO↗