arXiv subjects

Natalie Collina

Publications and source records attributed to Natalie Collina.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2024

The Value of Ambiguous Commitments in Multi-Follower Games

We study games in which a leader makes a single commitment, and then multiple followers (each with a different utility function) respond. In particular, we study ambiguous commitment strategies in these games, in which the leader may commit to a set of mixed strategies, and ambiguity-averse followers respond to maximize their worst-case utility over the set of leader strategies. Special cases of this setting have previously been studied when there is a single follower: in these cases, it is known that the leader can increase her utility by making an ambiguous commitment if the follower is restricted to playing a pure strategy, but that no gain can be had from ambiguity if the follower may mix. We confirm that this result continues to hold in the setting of general Stackelberg games. We then develop a theory of ambiguous commitment in games with multiple followers. We begin by considering the case where the leader must make the same commitment against each follower. We establish that -- unlike the case of a single follower -- ambiguous commitment can improve the leader's utility by an unboundedly large factor, even when followers are permitted to respond with mixed strategies and even. We go on to show an advantage for the leader coupling the same commitment across all followers, even when she has the ability to make a separate commitment to each follower. In particular, there exist general sum games in which the leader can enjoy an unboundedly large advantage by coupling her ambiguous commitment across multiple followers rather than committing against each individually. In zero-sum games we show there can be no such coupling advantage. Finally, we give a polynomial time algorithm for computing the optimal leader commitment strategy in the special case in which the leader has 2 actions (and k followers may have m actions), and prove that in the general case, the problem is NP-hard.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Efficient Stackelberg Strategies for Finitely Repeated Games

We study Stackelberg equilibria in finitely repeated games, where the leader commits to a strategy that picks actions in each round and can be adaptive to the history of play (i.e. they commit to an algorithm). In particular, we study static repeated games with no discounting. We give efficient algorithms for finding approximate Stackelberg equilibria in this setting, along with rates of convergence depending on the time horizon $T$. In many cases, these algorithms allow the leader to do much better on average than they can in the single-round Stackelberg. We give two algorithms, one computing strategies with an optimal $\frac{1}{T}$ rate at the expense of an exponential dependence on the number of actions, and another (randomized) approach computing strategies with no dependence on the number of actions but a worse dependence on $T$ of $\frac{1}{T^{0.25}}$. Both algorithms build upon a linear program to produce simple automata leader strategies and induce corresponding automata best-responses for the follower. We complement these results by showing that approximating the Stackelberg value in three-player finite-horizon repeated games is a computationally hard problem via a reduction from balanced vertex cover.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Repeated Contracting with Multiple Non-Myopic Agents: Policy Regret and Limited Liability

We study a repeated contracting setting in which a Principal adaptively chooses amongst $k$ Agents at each of $T$ rounds. The Agents are non-myopic, and so a mechanism for the Principal induces a $T$-round extensive form game amongst the Agents. We give several results aimed at understanding an under-explored aspect of contract theory -- the game induced when choosing an Agent to contract with. First, we show that this game admits a pure-strategy \emph{non-responsive} equilibrium amongst the Agents -- informally an equilibrium in which the Agent's actions depend on the history of realized states of nature, but not on the history of each other's actions, and so avoids the complexities of collusion and threats. Next, we show that if the Principal selects Agents using a \emph{monotone} bandit algorithm, then for any concave contract, in any such equilibrium, the Principal obtains no regret to contracting with the best Agent in hindsight -- not just given their realized actions, but also to the counterfactual world in which they had offered a guaranteed $T$-round contract to the best Agent in hindsight, which would have induced a different sequence of actions. Finally, we show that if the Principal selects Agents using a monotone bandit algorithm which guarantees no swap-regret, then the Principal can additionally offer only limited liability contracts (in which the Agent never needs to pay the Principal) while getting no-regret to the counterfactual world in which she offered a linear contract to the best Agent in hindsight -- despite the fact that linear contracts are not limited liability. We instantiate this theorem by demonstrating the existence of a monotone no swap-regret bandit algorithm, which to our knowledge has not previously appeared in the literature.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Pareto-Optimal Algorithms for Learning in Games

We study the problem of characterizing optimal learning algorithms for playing repeated games against an adversary with unknown payoffs. In this problem, the first player (called the learner) commits to a learning algorithm against a second player (called the optimizer), and the optimizer best-responds by choosing the optimal dynamic strategy for their (unknown but well-defined) payoff. Classic learning algorithms (such as no-regret algorithms) provide some counterfactual guarantees for the learner, but might perform much more poorly than other learning algorithms against particular optimizer payoffs. In this paper, we introduce the notion of asymptotically Pareto-optimal learning algorithms. Intuitively, if a learning algorithm is Pareto-optimal, then there is no other algorithm which performs asymptotically at least as well against all optimizers and performs strictly better (by at least $Ω(T)$) against some optimizer. We show that well-known no-regret algorithms such as Multiplicative Weights and Follow The Regularized Leader are Pareto-dominated. However, while no-regret is not enough to ensure Pareto-optimality, we show that a strictly stronger property, no-swap-regret, is a sufficient condition for Pareto-optimality. Proving these results requires us to address various technical challenges specific to repeated play, including the fact that there is no simple characterization of how optimizers who are rational in the long-term best-respond against a learning algorithm over multiple rounds of play. To address this, we introduce the idea of the asymptotic menu of a learning algorithm: the convex closure of all correlated distributions over strategy profiles that are asymptotically implementable by an adversary. We show that all no-swap-regret algorithms share the same asymptotic menu, implying that all no-swap-regret algorithms are ``strategically equivalent''.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Efficient Prior-Free Mechanisms for No-Regret Agents

We study a repeated Principal Agent problem between a long lived Principal and Agent pair in a prior free setting. In our setting, the sequence of realized states of nature may be adversarially chosen, the Agent is non-myopic, and the Principal aims for a strong form of policy regret. Following Camara, Hartline, and Johnson, we model the Agent's long-run behavior with behavioral assumptions that relax the common prior assumption (for example, that the Agent has no swap regret). Within this framework, we revisit the mechanism proposed by Camara et al., which informally uses calibrated forecasts of the unknown states of nature in place of a common prior. We give two main improvements. First, we give a mechanism that has an exponentially improved dependence (in terms of both running time and regret bounds) on the number of distinct states of nature. To do this, we show that our mechanism does not require truly calibrated forecasts, but rather forecasts that are unbiased subject to only a polynomially sized collection of events -- which can be produced with polynomial overhead. Second, in several important special cases -- including the focal linear contracting setting -- we show how to remove strong ``Alignment'' assumptions (which informally require that near-ties are always broken in favor of the Principal) by specifically deploying ``stable'' policies that do not have any near ties that are payoff relevant to the Principal. Taken together, our new mechanism makes the compelling framework proposed by Camara et al. much more powerful, now able to be realized over polynomially sized state spaces, and while requiring only mild assumptions on Agent behavior.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Dynamic Weighted Matching with Heterogeneous Arrival and Departure Rates

We study a dynamic non-bipartite matching problem. There is a fixed set of agent types, and agents of a given type arrive and depart according to type-specific Poisson processes. Agent departures are not announced in advance. The value of a match is determined by the types of the matched agents. We present an online algorithm that is (1/8)-competitive with respect to the value of the optimal-in-hindsight policy, for arbitrary weighted graphs. Our algorithm treats agents heterogeneously, interpolating between immediate and delayed matching in order to thicken the market while still matching valuable agents opportunistically.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

On the (in)-approximability of Bayesian Revenue Maximization for a Combinatorial Buyer

We consider a revenue-maximizing single seller with $m$ items for sale to a single buyer whose value $v(\cdot)$ for the items is drawn from a known distribution $D$ of support $k$. A series of works by Cai et al. establishes that when each $v(\cdot)$ in the support of $D$ is additive or unit-demand (or $c$-demand), the revenue-optimal auction can be found in $\operatorname{poly}(m,k)$ time. We show that going barely beyond this, even to matroid-based valuations (a proper subset of Gross Substitutes), results in strong hardness of approximation. Specifically, even on instances with $m$ items and $k \leq m$ valuations in the support of $D$, it is not possible to achieve a $1/m^{1-\varepsilon}$-approximation for any $\varepsilon>0$ to the revenue-optimal mechanism for matroid-based valuations in (randomized) poly-time unless NP $\subseteq$ RP (note that a $1/k$-approximation is trivial). Cai et al.'s main technical contribution is a black-box reduction from revenue maximization for valuations in class $\mathcal{V}$ to optimizing the difference between two values in class $\mathcal{V}$. Our main technical contribution is a black-box reduction in the other direction (for a wide class of valuation classes), establishing that their reduction is essentially tight.

cs.GT↗