Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Nathan Benedetto Proença

Publications and source records attributed to Nathan Benedetto Proença.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Robust Approximation and the Arity Barrier at Width Two

Zwick's algorithm for Horn satisfiability shows that constraints of unbounded arity can admit a robust approximation guarantee independent of the arity. For finite constraint languages, Barto and Kozik proved that robust approximability is characterized by bounded width. We ask whether arity-independent robustness persists beyond width one and show that it fails already at width two. For Majority-closed Boolean linear constraints of maximum arity $k \ge 2$, we give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm that, without knowing $\varepsilon$, violates an expected $O(\sqrt{\varepsilon \log k})$ fraction of the constraint weight on $(1-\varepsilon)$-satisfiable instances. Under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), a matching NP-hardness lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{\varepsilon \log k})$ holds in an explicit parameter regime. Under this assumption, the bounded-width characterization therefore does not extend uniformly to constraints of unbounded arity. The algorithm rounds a degree-eight Sum-of-Squares (SoS) relaxation with a single Gaussian threshold. Since polynomial size alone does not make SoS solvable in polynomial bit complexity, we construct complete truncated Groebner bases for the soft Majority ideal and show that, at every fixed degree $2d$, the relaxation can be optimized to any rational accuracy in polynomial time with exactly feasible solutions, and degree-$2d$ SoS proofs can be found after an additive perturbation at degree at most $4d+10$. The lower bound combines Raghavendra's gap-to-hardness theorem with an integrality gap on a Gaussian star, analyzed via the Isaksson-Mossel theorem that parallel halfspaces maximize the joint membership probability of exchangeable Gaussians.

cs.CC↗

Maximum Cuts and Fractional Cut Covers: A Computational Study of a Randomized Semidefinite Programming Approach

We present experimental work on a primal-dual framework simultaneously approximating maximum cut and weighted fractional cut-covering instances. In this primal-dual framework, we solve a semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation to either the maximum cut problem or to the weighted fractional cut-covering problem, and then independently sample a collection of cuts via the random-hyperplane technique. We then simultaneously certify the approximate optimality of a cut and a fractional cut cover. We present several implementations which reliably achieve the celebrated Goemans and Williamson approximation ratio of $α_{\mathrm{GW}} \approx 0.878$ for both optimization problems simultaneously, after $\lceil 128 \ln m \rceil$ samples, a number significantly smaller than the best theoretical bounds. This is the first experimental work approximating the weighted fractional cut-covering problem, and we deliver robust and repeatable results despite the use of randomized algorithms and floating-point arithmetic. Careful pre-processing of instances and post-processing of numeric results allow for good empirical outcomes with both first-order and second-order SDP solvers. Nearly optimal SDP solutions are suitably perturbed to ensure better probabilistic and numerical behavior. Our experiments deviate from theory by using a linear programming (LP) solver to compute fractional cut covers. For most instances studied, LP solving produces certifiably better results than the theoretical algorithm after $\lceil 128 \ln m \rceil$ samples. All our experiments strictly follow a unified pipeline which explicitly documents all parameters used in each run.

math.OC↗

A Primal-Dual Extension of the Goemans--Williamson Algorithm for the Weighted Fractional Cut-Covering Problem

We study a weighted generalization of the fractional cut-covering problem, which we relate to the maximum cut problem via antiblocker and gauge duality. This relationship allows us to introduce a semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation whose solutions may be rounded into fractional cut covers by sampling via the random hyperplane technique. We then provide a $1/α_{\scriptscriptstyle \mathrm{GW}}$-approximation algorithm for the weighted fractional cut-covering problem, where $α_{\scriptscriptstyle \mathrm{GW}} \approx 0.878$ is the approximation factor of the celebrated Goemans--Williamson algorithm for the maximum cut problem. Nearly optimal solutions of the SDPs in our duality framework allow one to consider instances of the maximum cut and the fractional cut-covering problems as primal-dual pairs, where cuts and fractional cut covers simultaneously certify each other's approximation quality. We exploit this relationship to introduce new combinatorial certificates for both problems, as well as a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for producing such certificates. In~particular, we~show how the Goemans--Williamson algorithm implicitly approximates a weighted instance of the fractional cut-covering problem, and how our new algorithm explicitly approximates a weighted instance of the maximum cut problem. We conclude by discussing the role played by geometric representations of graphs in our results, and by proving our algorithms and analyses to be optimal in several aspects.

math.OC↗

Generalized Cuts and Grothendieck Covers: a Primal-Dual Approximation Framework Extending the Goemans--Williamson Algorithm

We provide a primal-dual framework for randomized approximation algorithms utilizing semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations. Our framework pairs a continuum of APX-complete problems including MaxCut, Max2Sat, MaxDicut, and more generally, Max-Boolean Constraint Satisfaction and MaxQ (maximization of a positive semidefinite quadratic form over the hypercube) with new APX-complete problems which are stated as convex optimization problems with exponentially many variables. These new dual counterparts, based on what we call Grothendieck covers, range from fractional cut covering problems (for MaxCut) to tensor sign covering problems (for MaxQ). For each of these problem pairs, our framework transforms the randomized approximation algorithms with the best known approximation factors for the primal problems to randomized approximation algorithms for their dual counterparts with reciprocal approximation factors which are tight with respect to the Unique Games Conjecture. For each APX-complete pair, our algorithms solve a single SDP relaxation and generate feasible solutions for both problems which also provide approximate optimality certificates for each other. Our work utilizes techniques from areas of randomized approximation algorithms, convex optimization, spectral sparsification, as well as Chernoff-type concentration results for random matrices.

cs.DS↗

Dual Hoffman Bounds for the Stability and Chromatic Numbers Based on SDP

The notion of duality is a key element in understanding the interplay between the stability and chromatic numbers of a graph. This notion is a central aspect in the celebrated theory of perfect graphs, and is further and deeply developed in the context of the Lovász theta function and its equivalent characterizations and variants. The main achievement of this paper is the introduction of a new family of norms, providing upper bounds for the stability number, that are obtained from duality from the norms motivated by Hoffman's lower bound for the chromatic number and which achieve the (complementary) Lovász theta function at their optimum. As a consequence, our norms make it formal that Hoffman's bound for the chromatic number and the Delsarte-Hoffman ratio bound for the stability number are indeed dual. Further, we show that our new bounds strengthen the convex quadratic bounds for the stability number studied by Luz and Schrijver, and which achieve the Lovász theta function at their optimum. One of the key observations regarding weighted versions of these bounds is that, for any upper bound for the stability number of a graph which is a positive definite monotone gauge function, its gauge dual is a lower bound on the fractional chromatic number, and conversely. Our presentation is elementary and accessible to a wide audience.

math.CO↗