Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Navid Talebanfard

Publications and source records attributed to Navid Talebanfard.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

The Switching Lemma shows what the Switching Lemma cannot prove: an unconditional natural-proofs barrier

Razborov and Rudich (JCSS'97) observed that all known lower-bound proofs follow a certain pattern: when showing that a function $F$ is hard, along the way the proof provides us with a distinguisher, namely, an efficient algorithm which can distinguish easy functions from random functions. They called such lower-bound proofs natural proofs. They then showed a natural-proofs barrier: under standard cryptographic assumptions, natural proofs cannot show superpolynomial lower-bounds against Boolean circuits. Along similar lines it can be shown that under a suitable cryptographic assumption, natural proofs cannot significantly improve the current state-of-the-art lower bound against constant depth circuits (AC0). The state of the art, using H\r{a}stad's Switching Lemma (SL), is $2^{n^{1/(d-1)}}$ for depth-$d$ circuits, and (conditionally) no natural proof can prove lower bounds of $2^{n^{c/d}}$ for some large constant $c$. In this paper we revisit the natural-proofs barrier from an $\textit{unconditional}$ perspective. We focus on AC0-natural proofs, i.e. proofs whose distinguishers are computable by AC0 circuits. Razborov and Rudich observed that lower bounds based on SL are AC0-natural. We show that this is true for most known lower-bound techniques against constant-depth circuits. We then establish an unconditional barrier for such proofs. By localizing the Trevisan--Xue pseudorandom generator, we are able to show that no AC0-natural proof can prove a lower bound greater than $2^{n^{7/(d-5)}}$ against depth-$d$ circuits. This is in the same quantitative regime as the SL frontier which instead has $1/(d-1)$ in the power of $n$. The proof has a striking self-referential aspect: the proof of security of the Trevisan--Xue generator crucially relies on SL, and so SL has been used to show that AC0-natural proofs, such as SL itself, cannot prove AC0 lower bounds better than that of SL.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Optimal Monotone Depth-Three Circuit Lower Bounds for Majority

Gurumuhkani et al. (CCC'24) introduced the local enumeration problem $Enum(k, t)$ as follows: for a natural number $k$ and a parameter $t$, given an $n$-variate $k$-CNF with no satisfying assignment with Hamming weight less than $t(n)$, enumerate all satisfying assignments of Hamming weight exactly $t(n)$. They showed that efficient algorithms for local enumeration yield new $k$-SAT algorithms and depth-3 lower bounds for Majority function. As the first non-trivial case, they gave an algorithm for $k = 3$ which in particular gave a new lower bound on the size of depth-3 circuits with bottom fan-in at most 3 computing Majority. In this paper, we give an optimal algorithm that solves local enumeration on monotone formulas for $k = 3$ and all $t \le n/2$. In particular, we obtain an optimal lower bound on the size of monotone depth-3 circuits with bottom fan-in at most 3 computing Majority.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Optimal Depth-Three Circuits for Inner Product

We show that Inner Product in $2n$ variables, $\mathbf{IP}_n(x, y) = x_1y_1 \oplus \ldots \oplus x_ny_n$, can be computed by depth-3 bottom fan-in 2 circuits of size $\mathsf{poly}(n)\cdot (9/5)^n$, matching the lower bound of G\"o\"os, Guan, and Mosnoi (Inform. Comput.'24). Our construction is obtained via the following steps. - We provide a general template for constructing optimal depth-3 circuits with bottom fan-in $k$ for an arbitrary function $f$. We do this in two steps. First, we partition $f^{-1}(1)$ into orbits of its automorphism group. Second, for each orbit, we construct one $k$-CNF that (a) accepts the largest number of inputs from that orbit and (b) rejects all inputs rejected by $f$. - We instantiate the template for $\mathbf{IP}_n$ and $k = 2$. Guided by the intuition (which we call modularity principle) that optimal 2-CNFs can be constructed by taking the conjunction of variable-disjoint copies of smaller $2$-CNFs, we use computer search to identify a small set of building block 2-CNFs over at most 4 variables. - We again use computer search to discover appropriate combinations (disjoint conjunctions) of building blocks to arrive at optimal 2-CNFs and analyze them using techniques from analytic combinatorics. We believe that the approach outlined in this paper can be applied to a wide range of functions to determine their depth-3 complexity.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2025

Local Enumeration: The Not-All-Equal Case

Gurumukhani et al. (CCC'24) proposed the local enumeration problem Enum(k, t) as an approach to break the Super Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SSETH): for a natural number $k$ and a parameter $t$, given an $n$-variate $k$-CNF with no satisfying assignment of Hamming weight less than $t(n)$, enumerate all satisfying assignments of Hamming weight exactly $t(n)$. Furthermore, they gave a randomized algorithm for Enum(k, t) and employed new ideas to analyze the first non-trivial case, namely $k = 3$. In particular, they solved Enum(3, n/2) in expected $1.598^n$ time. A simple construction shows a lower bound of $6^{\frac{n}{4}} \approx 1.565^n$. In this paper, we show that to break SSETH, it is sufficient to consider a simpler local enumeration problem NAE-Enum(k, t): for a natural number $k$ and a parameter $t$, given an $n$-variate $k$-CNF with no satisfying assignment of Hamming weight less than $t(n)$, enumerate all Not-All-Equal (NAE) solutions of Hamming weight exactly $t(n)$, i.e., those that satisfy and falsify some literal in every clause. We refine the algorithm of Gurumukhani et al. and show that it optimally solves NAE-Enum(3, n/2), namely, in expected time $poly(n) \cdot 6^{\frac{n}{4}}$.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2024

Local Enumeration and Majority Lower Bounds

Depth-3 circuit lower bounds and $k$-SAT algorithms are intimately related; the state-of-the-art $\Sigma^k_3$-circuit lower bound and the $k$-SAT algorithm are based on the same combinatorial theorem. In this paper we define a problem which reveals new interactions between the two. Define Enum($k$, $t$) problem as: given an $n$-variable $k$-CNF and an initial assignment $\alpha$, output all satisfying assignments at Hamming distance $t$ from $\alpha$, assuming that there are no satisfying assignments of Hamming distance less than $t$ from $\alpha$. Observe that: an upper bound $b(n, k, t)$ on the complexity of Enum($k$, $t$) implies: - Depth-3 circuits: Any $\Sigma^k_3$ circuit computing the Majority function has size at least $\binom{n}{\frac{n}{2}}/b(n, k, \frac{n}{2})$. - $k$-SAT: There exists an algorithm solving $k$-SAT in time $O(\sum_{t = 1}^{n/2}b(n, k, t))$. A simple construction shows that $b(n, k, \frac{n}{2}) \ge 2^{(1 - O(\log(k)/k))n}$. Thus, matching upper bounds would imply a $\Sigma^k_3$-circuit lower bound of $2^{\Omega(\log(k)n/k)}$ and a $k$-SAT upper bound of $2^{(1 - \Omega(\log(k)/k))n}$. The former yields an unrestricted depth-3 lower bound of $2^{\omega(\sqrt{n})}$ solving a long standing open problem, and the latter breaks the Super Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. In this paper, we propose a randomized algorithm for Enum($k$, $t$) and introduce new ideas to analyze it. We demonstrate the power of our ideas by considering the first non-trivial instance of the problem, i.e., Enum($3$, $\frac{n}{2}$). We show that the expected running time of our algorithm is $1.598^n$, substantially improving on the trivial bound of $3^{n/2} \simeq 1.732^n$. This already improves $\Sigma^3_3$ lower bounds for Majority function to $1.251^n$. The previous bound was $1.154^n$ which follows from the work of H{\aa}stad, Jukna, and Pudl\'ak (Comput. Complex.'95).

cs.CC↗
arXiv2024

Bounded-Depth Frege Lower Bounds for Random 3-CNFs via Deterministic Restrictions

A major open problem in proof complexity is to demonstrate that random 3-CNFs with a linear number of clauses require super-polynomial size refutations in bounded-depth Frege systems. We take the first step towards addressing this question by establishing a super-linear lower bound: for every $k$, there exists $\epsilon_k > 0$ such that any depth-$k$ Frege refutation of a random $n$-variable 3-CNF with $\Theta(n)$ clauses has $\Omega(n^{1 + \epsilon_k})$ steps w.h.p. Our proof involves a novel adaptation of the deterministic restriction technique introduced by Chaudhuri and Radhakrishnan (STOC'96). For a given formula, this technique provides a method to fix a small number of variables in a bottom-up manner, ensuring that every surviving gate has small fan-in. Consequently, the resulting formula depends on a limited number of variables and can be simplified to a constant by a small variable assignment. Adapting this approach to proof complexity requires addressing the usual challenges associated with maintaining the hardness of a given instance. To this end, we introduce the following generalizations of standard proof complexity tools: - Weak expanders: These bipartite graphs relax the classical notion of expansion by only requiring that small sets have a non-empty boundary, while intermediate-sized sets have a large boundary. This property is sufficient to preserve hardness (e.g., for resolution width) and is easier to maintain as we remove vertices from the graph. - Formula assignments: To simplify a Frege proof, we consider a generalization of partial restrictions that assign values to formulas instead of just variables. We treat these assignments as new axioms added to our formula, as they generally cannot be expressed as variable substitutions.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2022

Linear Branching Programs and Directional Affine Extractors

A natural model of read-once linear branching programs is a branching program where queries are $\mathbb{F}_2$ linear forms, and along each path, the queries are linearly independent. We consider two restrictions of this model, which we call weakly and strongly read-once, both generalizing standard read-once branching programs and parity decision trees. Our main results are as follows. - Average-case complexity. We define a pseudo-random class of functions which we call directional affine extractors, and show that these functions are hard on average for the strongly read-once model. We then present an explicit construction of such function with good parameters. This strengthens the result of Cohen and Shinkar (ITCS'16) who gave such average-case hardness for parity decision trees. Directional affine extractors are stronger than the more familiar class of affine extractors. Given the significance of these functions, we expect that our new class of functions might be of independent interest. - Proof complexity. We also consider the proof system $\text{Res}[\oplus]$ which is an extension of resolution with linear queries. A refutation of a CNF in this proof system naturally defines a linear branching program solving the corresponding search problem. Conversely, we show that a weakly read-once linear BP solving the search problem can be converted to a $\text{Res}[\oplus]$ refutation with constant blow up.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2021

A Variant of the VC-dimension with Applications to Depth-3 Circuits

We introduce the following variant of the VC-dimension. Given $S \subseteq \{0, 1\}^n$ and a positive integer $d$, we define $\mathbb{U}_d(S)$ to be the size of the largest subset $I \subseteq [n]$ such that the projection of $S$ on every subset of $I$ of size $d$ is the $d$-dimensional cube. We show that determining the largest cardinality of a set with a given $\mathbb{U}_d$ dimension is equivalent to a Tur\'an-type problem related to the total number of cliques in a $d$-uniform hypergraph. This allows us to beat the Sauer--Shelah lemma for this notion of dimension. We use this to obtain several results on $\Sigma_3^k$-circuits, i.e., depth-$3$ circuits with top gate OR and bottom fan-in at most $k$: * Tight relationship between the number of satisfying assignments of a $2$-CNF and the dimension of the largest projection accepted by it, thus improving Paturi, Saks, and Zane (Comput. Complex. '00). * Improved $\Sigma_3^3$-circuit lower bounds for affine dispersers for sublinear dimension. Moreover, we pose a purely hypergraph-theoretic conjecture under which we get further improvement. * We make progress towards settling the $\Sigma_3^2$ complexity of the inner product function and all degree-$2$ polynomials over $\mathbb{F}_2$ in general. The question of determining the $\Sigma_3^3$ complexity of IP was recently posed by Golovnev, Kulikov, and Williams (ITCS'21).

cs.CC↗
arXiv2021

On the extension complexity of polytopes separating subsets of the Boolean cube

We show that 1. for every $A\subseteq \{0, 1\}^n$, there exists a polytope $P\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ with $P \cap \{0, 1\}^n = A$ and extension complexity $O(2^{n/2})$, 2. there exists an $A\subseteq \{0, 1\}^n$ such that the extension complexity of any $P$ with $P\cap \{0, 1\}^n = A$ must be at least $2^{\frac{n}{3}(1-o(1))}$. We also remark that the extension complexity of any 0/1-polytope in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is at most $O(2^n/n)$ and pose the problem whether the upper bound can be improved to $O(2^{cn})$, for $c<1$.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2021

A Separator Theorem for Hypergraphs and a CSP-SAT Algorithm

We show that for every $r \ge 2$ there exists $\epsilon_r > 0$ such that any $r$-uniform hypergraph with $m$ edges and maximum vertex degree $o(\sqrt{m})$ contains a set of at most $(\frac{1}{2} - \epsilon_r)m$ edges the removal of which breaks the hypergraph into connected components with at most $m/2$ edges. We use this to give an algorithm running in time $d^{(1 - \epsilon_r)m}$ that decides satisfiability of $m$-variable $(d, k)$-CSPs in which every variable appears in at most $r$ constraints, where $\epsilon_r$ depends only on $r$ and $k\in o(\sqrt{m})$. Furthermore our algorithm solves the corresponding #CSP-SAT and Max-CSP-SAT of these CSPs. We also show that CNF representations of unsatisfiable $(2, k)$-CSPs with variable frequency $r$ can be refuted in tree-like resolution in size $2^{(1 - \epsilon_r)m}$. Furthermore for Tseitin formulas on graphs with degree at most $k$ (which are $(2, k)$-CSPs) we give a deterministic algorithm finding such a refutation.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2016

Tighter Hard Instances for PPSZ

We construct uniquely satisfiable $k$-CNF formulas that are hard for the algorithm PPSZ. Firstly, we construct graph-instances on which "weak PPSZ" has savings of at most $(2 + ε) / k$; the saving of an algorithm on an input formula with $n$ variables is the largest $γ$ such that the algorithm succeeds (i.e. finds a satisfying assignment) with probability at least $2^{ - (1 - γ) n}$. Since PPSZ (both weak and strong) is known to have savings of at least $\frac{π^2 + o(1)}{6k}$, this is optimal up to the constant factor. In particular, for $k=3$, our upper bound is $2^{0.333\dots n}$, which is fairly close to the lower bound $2^{0.386\dots n}$ of Hertli [SIAM J. Comput.'14]. We also construct instances based on linear systems over $\mathbb{F}_2$ for which strong PPSZ has savings of at most $O\left(\frac{\log(k)}{k}\right)$. This is only a $\log(k)$ factor away from the optimal bound. Our constructions improve previous savings upper bound of $O\left(\frac{\log^2(k)}{k}\right)$ due to Chen et al. [SODA'13].

cs.CC↗