arXiv subjects

Nayem Sk

Publications and source records attributed to Nayem Sk.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

A viable form of the metric Teleparallel F(T) theory of gravity

Unlike F(R) gravity, pure metric F(T) gravity in the vacuum dominated era, ends up with an imaginary action and is therefore not feasible. This eerie situation may only be circumvented by associating a scalar field, which can also drive inflation in the very early universe. We show that, despite diverse claims, F(T) theory admits Noether symmetry only in the pressure-less dust era in the form F(T) proportional to the nth power of T, n being odd integers. A suitable form of F(T), admitting a viable Friedmann-like radiation dominated era, together with early deceleration and late-time accelerated expansion in the pressure-less dust era, has been proposed.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2021

Inflation with F(T) Teleparallel Gravity

We study early universe with a particular form of F(T) Telleparallel gravity theory, in which inflation is driven by a scalar field. To ensure slow rollover, two different potentials are chosen in a manner, such that they remain almost flat for large initial value of the scalar field. Inflationary parameters show wonderful fit with the presently available Planck's data set. The energy scale of inflation is sub-Planckian and graceful exit from inflation is also administered. The chosen form of F(T) administers late-time cosmic acceleration too. In the process, unification of the early inflation with late-time acceleration is ensured. Unfortunately, a decelerated radiation dominated era is only possible with a different form of (quartic) potential, which being devoid of a flat section does not admit slow rollover.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2020

Analyzing Conserved Currents in F(R) theory of gravity

F(R) theory of gravity is claimed to admit a host of conserved currents under the imposition of Noether symmetry following various techniques. However, for a constrained system such as gravity, Noether symmetry is not on-shell. As a result, the symmetries do not necessarily satisfy the field equations in general, constraints in particular, unless the generator is modified to incorporate the constraints. In the present manuscript, we apply the first theorem of Poisson to unveil the fact that not all the conserved currents appearing in the literature for F(R) theory of gravity, satisfy the field equations. We also provide a list of available forms of F(R) along with associated conserved currents, and construct a generalized action, which might address the cosmic puzzle, elegantly.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2019

Some aspects of modified theory of gravity in Palatini formalism unveiled

Under conformal transformation, f(R) theory of gravity in Palatini formalism leads to a Brans-Dicke type of scalar-tensor equivalent theory with a wrong sign in the effective kinetic energy term. This means, the effective scalar acts as the dark energy and so late-time cosmic acceleration in matter-dominated era is accountable. However, we unveil some aspects of Palatini formalism, which clearly reveals the fact that the formalism is not suitable to explain the cosmological evolution of the early universe with $f(\mathfrak{R})$ gravity alone. Additionally, it is noticed that some authors, in an attempt to explore Noether symmetry of the theory changed the sign of the kinetic term and hence obtained the wrong answer. Here, we make the correction and unmask a very interesting aspect of symmetry analysis.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2017

Noether Symmetry of Palatini $F(\Re)$ gravity

In metric formalism, Noether symmetry of F(R) theory of gravity in vacuum and in the presence of pressureless dust yields $F(R)\propto R^\frac{3}{2}$ along with the conserved current $\frac{d}{dt} (a\sqrt R)$ in Robertson-Walker metric and nothing else. However, Roshan et.al. had claimed in $\mathrm{Phys. Lett. \textbf{B668}, 238 (2008)}$ \cite{o} that Noether symmetry in the context of Palatini $F(\Re)$ theory of gravity admits $F(\Re)\propto \Re^{s}$, (where $s$ is an arbitrary constant) in matter domain era in Friedmann- Robertson-Walker universe. But, it has been shown that the conserved current obtained under the process does not satisfy the field equations in general. Here, it is shown that Noether Symmetry admits $F(\Re)\propto\Re^\frac{3}{2}$ along with a conserved current $Σ_{0} {a}[\frac{\dot a}{a}+ \frac{\dotΦ}{2Φ}]$ in Palatini gravity. Thus, their claim is not right.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2017

Noether symmetry in $f(T)$ teleparallel gravity

Hao Wei et.al. has claimed in $\mathrm{Phys. Lett. \textbf{B707}, 298 (2012)}$ that Noether symmetry in the context of teleparallel $f(T)$ theory of gravity admits $f(T)\propto T^{n}$, (where $n$ is an arbitrary) in matter domain era in Friedmann- Robertson universe. But, it has been shown that the conserved current obtained under the process does not satisfy the field equations in general. Here, it is shown that Noether Symmetry admits $f(T)\propto T^\frac{3}{2}$ along with a conserved current $ a \dot a T^\frac{1}{2}$ in teleparallel $f(T)$ gravity. Thus, their claim is not correct.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2016

Canonical formulation of Pais-Ulhenbeck action and resolving the issue of branched Hamiltonian

Shortcomings of Dirac's constrained analysis in the context of fourth order Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator action and the appearance of badly affected phase-space Hamiltonian for a generalized fourth order oscillator action, following Ostrogradski, Dirac and Horowitz's formalism, require a viable canonical formulation. This is achieved only after fixing appropriate variables at the end points and taking care of the counter surface terms obtained from variational principle. In the process a one-to-one correspondence between different higher order theories has been established. On the other hand the issue of branched Hamiltonian appearing in the presence of velocities with degree higher than two in the Lagrangian, has not been resolved uniquely as yet. However, often such terms appear with higher order theory, gravity in particular. Here we show that canonical formulation of higher order theory takes care of the issue elegantly.

hep-th↗

arXiv2015

Validating variational principle for higher order theory of gravity

Metric variation of higher order theory of gravity requires to fix the Ricci scalar in addition to the metric tensor at the boundary. Fixing Ricci scalar at the boundary implies that the classical solutions are fixed once and forever to the de-Sitter or anti de-Sitter solutions. Here, we justify such requirement from the standpoint of Noether Symmetry.

gr-qc↗