Persona Prompting in Multimodal Urban Perception: Descriptive Convergence and Interpretive Variation
This study examines how persona prompting shapes language generated by two multimodal large language models in urban perception, a setting for examining subjective interpretations of shared visual evidence. We organize outputs into three functional levels: descriptive grounding (captions), intermediate semantic layer (perception tags), and interpretive framing (justifications). Using approximately 60,000 persona-conditioned annotations per model from Qwen3-VL-8B and Gemma-4-E4B-it, we find that captions converge strongly across persona profiles and show only small attribute-associated differences. Justifications vary substantially more: economic status produces the largest difference in both models, with political orientation and personality also prominent. Paired image-level comparisons confirm larger justification than caption differences for these three attributes. For perception tags, personas sharing the same attribute level produce more similar tag sets than personas with different attribute levels, with the largest separation observed for economic status. Exploratory topic analysis further reveals persona-specific evaluative emphasis. Across models, profile-pair similarity patterns are strongly correlated for all three output types, although agreement is lowest for justifications. Overall, persona prompting affects interpretive framing more strongly than descriptive grounding.