Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Neta A. Bahcall

Publications and source records attributed to Neta A. Bahcall.

89 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Determining the Amplitude of Mass Fluctuations in the Universe

We present a method for determining the rms mass fluctuations on 8 h^-1 Mpc scale, sigma8. The method utilizes the rate of evolution of the abundance of rich clusters of galaxies. Using the Press-Schechter approximation, we show that the cluster abundance evolution is a strong function of sigma8: d log n/dz ~ -1/sigma8^2; low sigma8 models evolve exponentially faster than high sigma8 models, for a given mass cluster. For example, the number density of Coma-like clusters decreases by a factor of ~10^3$ from z = 0 to z ~ 0.5 for sigma8=0.5 models, while the decrease is only a factor of ~5 for sigma8 ~ 1. The strong exponential dependence on sigma8 arises because clusters represent rarer density peaks in low sigma8 models. We show that the evolution rate at z < 1 is insensitive to the density parameter $Ω$ or to the exact shape of the power spectrum. Cluster evolution therefore provides a powerful constraint on sigma8. Using available cluster data to z ~ 0.8, we find sigma8 = 0.83 +/- 0.15. This amplitude implies a bias parameter b ~ 1/sigma8 = 1.2 +/- 0.2, i.e., a nearly unbiased universe with mass approximately tracing light on large scales.

astro-ph↗

Constraining Omega with Cluster Evolution

We show that the evolution of the number density of rich clusters of galaxies breaks the degeneracy between Omega (the mass density ratio of the universe) and sigma_{8} (the normalization of the power spectrum), sigma_{8}Omega^{0.5} \simeq 0.5, that follows from the observed present-day abundance of rich clusters. The evolution of high-mass (Coma-like) clusters is strong in Omega=1, low-sigma_{8} models (such as the standard biased CDM model with sigma_{8} \simeq 0.5), where the number density of clusters decreases by a factor of \sim 10^{3} from z = 0 to z \simeq 0.5; the same clusters show only mild evolution in low-Omega, high-sigma_{8} models, where the decrease is a factor of \sim 10. This diagnostic provides a most powerful constraint on Omega. Using observations of clusters to z \simeq 0.5-1, we find only mild evolution in the observed cluster abundance. We find Omega = 0.3 \pm 0.1 and sigma_{8} = 0.85 \pm 0.15 (for Lambda = 0 models; for Omega + Lambda = 1 models, Omega = 0.34 \pm 0.13). These results imply, if confirmed by future surveys, that we live in a low-den sity, low-bias universe.

astro-ph↗

Large scale structure of the universe

How is the universe organized on large scales? How did this structure evolve from the unknown initial conditions to the present time? The answers to these questions will shed light on the cosmology we live in, the amount, composition and distribution of matter in the universe, the initial spectrum of density fluctuations, and the formation and evolution of galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and larger scale structures. I review observational studies of large-scale structure, describe the peculiar velocity field on large scales, and present the observational constraints placed on cosmological models and the mass density of the universe. While major progress has been made over the last decade, most observational problems in the field of large-scale structure remain open. I will highlight some of the unsolved problems that seem likely to be solved in the next decade.

astro-ph↗

Clusters and superclusters of galaxies

Rich clusters of galaxies are the most massive virialized systems known. Even though they contain only a small fraction of all galaxies, rich clusters provide a powerful tool for the study of galaxy formation, dark matter, large-scale structure, and cosmology. Superclusters, the largest known systems of galaxies, extend to (approx) 100h^{-1} Mpc in size and highlight the large-scale structure of the universe. This large-scale structure reflects initial conditions in the early universe and places strong contraints on models of galaxy formation and on cosmology. Some of the questions that can be addressed with clusters and superclusters of galaxies include: How did galaxies and larger structures form and evolve? What is the amount, composition, and distribution of matter in clusters and larger structures? How does the cluster mass density relate to the matter density in the universe? What constraints can the cluster and supercluster data place on cosmology? I will discuss in these lectures some of the properties of clusters and superclusters of galaxies that can be used to investigate these topics.

astro-ph↗

Large scale structure of the universe

How is the universe organized on large scales? How did this structure evolve from the unknown initial conditions of a rather smooth early universe to the present time? The answers to these questions will shed light on the cosmology we live in, the amount, composition and distribution of matter in the universe, the initial spectrum of density fluctuations that gave rise to this structure, and the formation and evolution of galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and larger scale structures. To address these fundamental questions, large and accurate sky surveys are needed---in various wavelengths and to various depths. In this presentation I review current observational studies of large scale structure, present the constraints these observations place on cosmological models and on the amount of dark matter in the universe, and highlight some of the main unsolved problems in the field of large-scale structure that could be solved over the next decade with the aid of current and future surveys. I briefly discuss some of

astro-ph↗

The Peculiar Velocity Function of Galaxy Clusters

The peculiar velocity function of clusters of galaxies is determined using an accurate sample of cluster velocities based on Tully-Fisher distances of Sc galaxies (Giovanelli et al 1995b). In contrast with previous results based on samples with considerably larger velocity uncertainties, the observed velocity function does not exhibit a tail of high velocity clusters. The results indicate a low probability of $\lesssim$\,5\% of finding clusters with one-dimensional velocities greater than $\sim$ 600 {\kms}. The root-mean-square one-dimensional cluster velocity is 293$\pm$28 {\kms}. The observed cluster velocity function is compared with expectations from different cosmological models. The absence of a high velocity tail in the observed function is most consistent with a low mass-density ($Ω\sim$0.3) CDM model, and is inconsistent at $\gtrsim 3 σ$ level with $Ω$= 1.0 CDM and HDM models. The root-mean-square one-dimensional cluster velocities in these models correspond, respectively, to 314, 516, and 632 {\kms} (when convolved with the observational uncertainties). Comparison with the observed RMS cluster velocity of 293$\pm$28 {\kms} further supports the low-density CDM model.

astro-ph↗

The Baryon Fraction and Velocity--Temperature Relation in Galaxy Clusters : Models versus Observations

The observed baryon fraction and velocity--temperature relation in clusters of galaxies are compared with hydrodynamic simulations in two cosmological models : standard (Omega = 1) and a low-density flat (Omega=0.45 and λ=0.55) CDM models, normalized to the COBE background fluctuations. The observed properties of clusters include the velocity dispersion versus temperature relation, the gas mass versus total mass relation, and the gas mass fraction versus velocity dispersion relation. We find that, while both cosmological models reproduce well the shape of these observed functions, only low-density CDM can reproduce the observed amplitudes. The cluster gas mass fraction reflects approximately the baryon fraction in the models, with a slight anti-bias. Therefore, due to the low baryon density given by nucleosynthesis, Omega = 1 models produce too few baryons in clusters compared with observations. Scaling our results as a function of Omega, we find that a low-density CDM model, with Omega approximately 0.3 - 0.4, best reproduces the observed mean baryon fraction in clusters. The observed beta parameter of clusters, beta = sigma^2/(k T/mu m_p) = 0.94 \pm 0.08 discriminates less well between the models; it is consistent with that produced by low-density CDM (1.10 \pm 0.22), while it is slightly larger than expected but still consistent with Omega = 1 (0.70 \pm 0.14).

astro-ph↗

Where is the Dark Matter?

How much dark matter is there in the universe and where is it located? These are two of the most fundamental questions in cosmology. We use in this paper optical and x-ray mass determinations of galaxies, groups, and clusters of galaxies to suggest that most of the dark matter may reside in very large halos around galaxies, typically extending to ~200 kpc for bright galaxies. We show that the mass-to-light ratio of galaxy systems does not increase significantly with linear scale beyond the very large halos suggested for individual galaxies. Rather, the total mass of large scale systems such as groups and rich clusters of galaxies, even superclusters, can on average be accounted for by the total mass of their member galaxies, including their large halos (which may be stripped-off in the dense cluster environment but still remain in the clusters) plus the mass of the hot intracluster gas. This conclusion also suggests that we may live in a low-density universe with Omega ~ 0.2 - 0.3.

astro-ph↗

RATING COSMOLOGICAL MODELS

I summarize the successes and failures of the most popular current cosmological models in accounting for the available observations. This evaluation, presented as the summary of the 11th Potsdam Workshop on Large-Scale Structure, was discussed by all the participants. I present the ratings given to each model based on a confrontation with the data, and the final vote taken.

astro-ph↗

COSMOLOGY WITH CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES

Rich clusters of galaxies, the largest virialized systems known, provide a powerful tool for the study of cosmology. Some of the fundamental questions that can be addressed with clusters of galaxies include: how did galaxies and large-scale structure form and evolve? What is the amount, composition and distribution of matter in the universe? I review some of the studies utilizing clusters of galaxies to investigare, among others: - The dark matter on clusters scale and the mean mass-density of the universe; - The large-scale structure of the universe; - The peculiar velocity field on large scales; - The mass-function of groups and clusters of galaxies; - The constraints placed on specific cosmological models using the cluster data.

astro-ph↗

CLUSTERING AND LARGE SCALE STRUCTURE WITH THE SDSS

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) will provide a complete imaging and spectroscopic survey of the high-latitude northern sky. The 2D survey will image the sky in five colors and will contain nearly 5 x 107 galaxies to g ~ 23m. The spectroscopic survey will obtain spectra of the brightest 106 galaxies, 105 quasars, and 103.5 rich clusters of galaxies (to g~18.3-19.3m, respectively). I summarize some of the science opportunities that will be made possible by this survey for studying the clustering and large-scale structure of the universe. The survey will identify a complete sample of several thousand rich clusters of galaxies, both in 2D and 3D - the largest automated sample yet available. The extensive cluster sample can be used to determine critical clustering properties such as the luminosity-function, velocity-function, and mass-function of clusters of galaxies (a critical test for cosmological models), detailed cluster dynamics and W(dyn), the cluster correlation function and its dependence on richness, cluster evolution, superclustering and voids to the largest scales yet observed, the motions of clusters and their large-scale peculiar velocity field, as well as detailed correlations between x-ray and optical properties of clusters, the density-morphology relation, and cluster-quasar associations. The large redshift survey, reaching to a depth of 600h-1 Mpc, will accurately map the largest scales yet observed, determine the power-spectrum and correlation function on these large scales for different type galaxies, and study the clustering of quasars to high redshifts (z 4). The implications of the survey for cosmological models, the dark matter, and W are also discussed.

astro-ph↗

The Motions of Clusters and Groups of Galaxies

The distributions of peculiar velocities of rich clusters and of groups of galaxies are investigated for different cosmological models and are compared with observations. Four cosmological models are studied: standard ($Ω=1$) CDM, low-density ($Ω=0.3$) CDM, HDM ($Ω=1$), and PBI ($Ω=0.3$), all COBE normalized. We find that rich clusters of galaxies exhibit a Maxwellian distribution of peculiar velocities in all models,as expected from a Gaussian initial density field. The cluster 3-D velocity distribution typically peaks at $v \sim 600$ km s$^{-1}$, and extends to high cluster velocities of $v \sim 2000$ km s$^{-1}$. The low-density CDM model exhibits somewhat lower velocities: it peaks at $\sim 400$ km s$^{-1}$, and extends to $\sim 1200$ km s$^{-1}$. Approximately 10\% ($\sim$1\% for low- density CDM) of all model rich clusters move with high peculiar velocities of $v \ge 10^3$ km s$^{-1}$. The highest velocity clusters frequently originate in dense superclusters. The model velocity distributions of groups and clusters of galaxies are compared with observations. The data exhibit a larger high-velocity tail, to $v_r \geq 2000$ km s$^{-1}$, than seen in the model simulations (except HDM). Due to the large observational uncertainties, however, the data are consistent at a $\sim 1$ to $3σ$ level with the model predictions and with a Gaussian initial density field. Accurate observations of cluster peculiar velocities, especially at the high-velocity tail, should provide powerful constraints on the cosmological models.

astro-ph↗

Velocity Correlations of Galaxy Clusters

We determine the velocity correlation function, pairwise peculiar velocity difference, and root-mean-square pairwise peculiar velocity dispersion of rich clusters of galaxies, as a function of pair separation, for three cosmological models: Omega=1 and Omega=0.3 CDM, and Omega=0.3 PBI models (all flat and COBE-normalized). We find that close cluster pairs, with separation r<10Mpc/h, exhibit strong attractive peculiar velocities in all models; the cluster pairwise velocities depend sensitively on the model. The mean pairwise attractive velocity of clusters on 5Mpc/h scale ranges from 1700 km/s for Omega=1 CDM, to 1000 km/s for PBI, to 700 km/s for Omega=0.3 CDM. The small-scale pairwise velocities depend also on cluster mass: richer, more massive clusters exhibit stronger attractive velocities than less massive clusters. On large scales, from 20 to 200Mpc/h, the cluster peculiar velocities are increasingly dominated by bulk and random motions; they are independent of cluster mass. The cluster velocity correlation function, which reflects the bulk motion minus the relative motion of pairs, is negative on small scales for Omega=1 and Omega=0.3 CDM, and positive for PBI; this indicates stronger pairwise motion than bulk motion on small scales for CDM, and relatively larger bulk motions for PBI. The cluster velocity correlation function is positive on very large scales, from 10 to 200Mpc/h, for all models. These positive correlations, which decrease monotonically with scale, indicate significant bulk motions of clusters up to 200Mpc/h. The strong dependence of the cluster velocity functions on models, especially at small separations, makes them useful tools in constraining cosmological models when compared with observations.

astro-ph↗

Probing the Large-Scale Velocity Field with Clusters of Galaxies

What is the role of clusters of galaxies in probing the large-scale velocity field of the universe? We investigate the distribution of peculiar velocities of clusters of galaxies in the popular low-density ($Ω=0.3$) flat Cold-Dark-Matter (CDM) cosmological model, which best fits many large-scale structure observations. An $Ω=1$ CDM model is also studied for comparison. We find that clusters of galaxies are efficient tracers of the large-scale velocity field. The clusters exhibit a Maxwellian distribution of peculiar velocities, as expected from Gaussian initial density fluctuations. The cluster 3-D velocity distribution for the $Ω=0.3$ model peaks at $v \sim 400$ km s$^{-1}$, and extends to high velocities of $v \sim 1200$ km s$^{-1}$. The rms peculiar velocity of the clusters is $440$ km s$^{-1}$. Approximately 10\% of all model clusters move with high peculiar velocities of $v \ge 700$ km s$^{-1}$. The observed velocity distribution of clusters of galaxies is compared with the predictions from cosmological models. The observed data exhibit a larger velocity tail than seen in the model simulations; however, due to the large observational uncertainties, the data are consistent at a $\sim 3σ$ level with the model predictions, and with a Gaussian initial density field. The large peculiar velocities reported for some clusters of galaxies ($v \geq 3000$ km s$^{-1}$) are likely to be overestimated, if the current model is viable.

astro-ph↗

The Motions of Clusters and Groups of Galaxies

The distributions of peculiar velocities of rich clusters and of groups of galaxies are investigated for different cosmological models and are compared with observations. Four cosmological models are studied: standard ($Ω=1$) CDM, low-density CDM, HDM ($Ω=1$), and PBI. We find that rich clusters of galaxies exhibit a Maxwellian distribution of peculiar velocities in all models, as expected from a Gaussian initial density fluctuation field. The cluster 3-D velocity distribution is generally similar in the models: it peaks at $v \sim 500$ km s$^{-1}$, and extends to high cluster velocities of $v \sim 1500$ km s$^{-1}$. Approximately 10\% of all model rich clusters move with high peculiar velocities of $v \ge 10^3$ km s$^{-1}$. The highest velocity clusters frequently originate in dense superclusters. The group velocity distribution is, in general, similar to the velocity distribution of the rich clusters. In all but the low-density CDM model, the mass exhibits a longer tail of high velocities than do the clusters. This high-velocity tail originates mostly from the high velocities that exist within rich clusters. The model velocity distributions of groups and clusters of galaxies are compared with observations. The data are generally consistent with the models, but exhibit a somewhat larger high-velocity tail, to $v_r \sim 3000$ km s$^{-1}$. While this high-velocity tail is similar to the HDM model predictions, the data are consistent with the other models studied, including the low-density CDM model, which best fits most other large-scale structure observations. The observed velocity

astro-ph↗

The Correlation Function of Flux-Limited X-Ray Clusters

We show that the spatial correlation function of a flux-limited sample of X-ray selected clusters of galaxies will exhibit a correlation scale that is smaller than the correlation scale of a volume-limited, richness-limited sample of comparable apparent spatial density. The flux-limited sample contains clusters of different richnesses at different distances: poor groups are found nearby and rich clusters at greater distances. Since the cluster correlation strength is known to increase with richness, the flux-limited sample averages over the correlations of poor and rich clusters. On the other hand, a volume-limited, richness-limited sample has a minimum richness threshold, and a constant mixture of richnesses with redshift. Using the observed correlation scale for rich ($R\ge 1$) clusters, $r_o (R\ge 1) = 21\pm 2 h^{-1}$Mpc that was determined from previous volume-limited studies, we derive for the ROSAT flux-limited X-ray cluster sample $r_o({\rm flux}{\rm -}{\rm limited}) \approx 14h^{-1}$Mpc, in agreement with the recently observed value of $13.7\pm 2.3 h^{-1}$Mpc.

astro-ph↗

Resolving the Beta-Discrepancy for Clusters of Galaxies

Previous comparisons of optical and X-ray observations of clusters of galaxies have lead to the so-called ``$β$ - discrepancy'' that has persisted for the last decade. The standard hydrostatic-isothermal model for clusters predicts that the parameter $β_{spec} = σ_{r}^{2}/(kT/μm_{p})$, which describes the ratio of energy per unit mass in galaxies to that in the gas, should equal the parameter $β_{fit}$ (where $ρ_{gas}(r) \propto ρ_{gal}(r)^{β_{fit}}$) determined from the X-ray surface brightness distribution. The observations suggest an apparent discrepancy : $β_{spec} \sim 1.2$ (i.e., the galaxies are ``hotter'' than the gas) while $β_{fit} \sim 0.65$ (i.e., the gas is ``hotter'' and more extended than the galaxies). Here we show that the discrepancy is resolved when the actual observed galaxy distribution in clusters is used, $ρ_{gal}(r) \propto r^{-2.4 \pm 0.2}$, instead of the previously assumed steeper King approximation, $ρ_{gal}(r) \propto r^{-3}$. Using a large sample of clusters, we find best-fit mean values of $β_{spec} = 0.94 \pm 0.08$ and $β_{fit}^{corrected} = 1.25 \times β_{fit} = 0.84 \pm 0.10$. These results resolve the $β$ - discrepancy and provide support for the hydrostatic cluster model.

astro-ph↗