SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Niccolò Zanichelli

Publications and source records attributed to Niccolò Zanichelli.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

How much technical talent is there? A systematic estimate of the ML research pool among 3 million consultants

We identify a substantial pool of technically competent ML research talent (in the low thousands) in companies which offer consulting in machine learning. We systematically searched the internet, global business databases, and conference/paper affiliations for ML consulting firms. Employee LinkedIn resumes were then scored by keyword filters and large-language-model (LLM) classifiers; these signals were combined in a bootstrap probit model to estimate technical ML research talent per firm. A subset of companies also completed a 3-day research and engineering work trial. We screened 2121 organizations and found 403 offering broad ML consulting. Our 50th percentile aggregate estimate of 'highly technical' ML research talent across these organizations was 1121 (80% CI: 252-3165) -- i.e. twice as many as all alumni of the MATS training program. For our work trial 97 companies were approached, 20 applied, 8 were invited to participate, and 5 of 8 received at least a conditional recommendation for technical AI safety work. As of late 2025, no AI model was able to pass the work trial.

cs.CY

State of Brain Emulation Report 2025

The State of Brain Emulation Report 2025 provides a comprehensive reassessment of the field's progress since Sandberg and Bostrom's 2008 Whole Brain Emulation roadmap. The report is organized around three core capabilities required for brain emulation: recording brain function (Neural Dynamics), mapping brain structure (Connectomics), and emulation and embodiment (Computational Neuroscience). It also identifies ongoing challenges and outlines strategic priorities to help the field move forward.

q-bio.NC

NeuroAI for AI Safety

As AI systems become increasingly powerful, the need for safe AI has become more pressing. Humans are an attractive model for AI safety: as the only known agents capable of general intelligence, they perform robustly even under conditions that deviate significantly from prior experiences, explore the world safely, understand pragmatics, and can cooperate to meet their intrinsic goals. Intelligence, when coupled with cooperation and safety mechanisms, can drive sustained progress and well-being. These properties are a function of the architecture of the brain and the learning algorithms it implements. Neuroscience may thus hold important keys to technical AI safety that are currently underexplored and underutilized. In this roadmap, we highlight and critically evaluate several paths toward AI safety inspired by neuroscience: emulating the brain's representations, information processing, and architecture; building robust sensory and motor systems from imitating brain data and bodies; fine-tuning AI systems on brain data; advancing interpretability using neuroscience methods; and scaling up cognitively-inspired architectures. We make several concrete recommendations for how neuroscience can positively impact AI safety.

cs.AI