SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Nicola Henkelmann

Publications and source records attributed to Nicola Henkelmann.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Optimal Excitation Design in Parameter Identification

Parameter identification is crucial in virtual engineering processes, yet determining appropriate system excitations for identifying specific parameters remains challenging. In practice, extensive experimental programs often fail to generate data with sufficient information content for reliable parameter estimation. This work presents a systematic approach for deriving optimal excitations by maximizing the global sensitivity of target parameters across the space of possible excitation functions. To address the computational challenge of sensitivity evaluation during optimization, we develop two complementary approaches based on uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. For systems with known mathematical structure, we present an intrusive polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) method that constructs deterministic surrogate models, enabling rapid sensitivity computation. For black-box models where intrusive approaches are not feasible, we introduce a novel non-intrusive method based on optimal transport theory, specifically using Wasserstein distances to quantify sensitivity measures without requiring knowledge of internal system dynamics. Both methods significantly reduce computational costs, making optimal excitation design practical for complex engineering systems. We demonstrate the effectiveness of both approaches on vehicle dynamics models, showing substantial improvements in parameter identification capability. The benefit for parameter identification is further validated experimentally on a test vehicle and compared to the state of the art.

math.OC

Knowledge-based model validation using a custom metric

Vehicle models have a long history of research and as of today are able to model the involved physics in a reasonable manner. However, each new vehicle has its new characteristics or parameters. The identification of these is the main task of an engineer. To validate whether the correct parameter set has been chosen is a tedious task and often can only be performed by experts. Metrics known commonly used in literature are able to compare different results under certain aspects. However, they fail to answer the question: Are the models accurate enough? In this article, we propose the usage of a custom metric trained on the knowledge of experts to tackle this problem. Our approach involves three main steps: first, the formalized collection of subject matter experts' opinion on the question: Having seen the measurement and simulation time series in comparison, is the model quality sufficient? From this step, we obtain a data set that is able to quantify the sufficiency of a simulation result based on a comparison to corresponding experimental data. In a second step, we compute common model metrics on the measurement and simulation time series and use these model metrics as features to a regression model. Third, we fit a regression model to the experts' opinions. This regression model, i.e., our custom metric, can than predict the sufficiency of a new simulation result and gives a confidence on this prediction.

cs.CE