Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Nicolas Farès

Publications and source records attributed to Nicolas Farès.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

La Notion D'irrationalitÉ Selon Un MathÉmaticien Du Xe SiÈcle: Abū Ja'far Al-Khāzin

The treatise of Abū Ja'far al-Khāzin (Xth century), entitled "Commentary on the introduction of the tenth book of the treatise of Euclid" ("tafsīr sadr al-maqāla al-'āshira min kitāb Uqlīdis") exists in eight manuscripts. In this paper we present a study of this treatise, based on a first edition we have made, according to the copies of the manuscripts of Paris, Leiden and Tunis, Ahmadiya. A reading of this treatise of al-Khāzin proves that this mathematician did a profound study of the Xth book of Euclid Elements, in order to gain a global comprehension. In effect, he presented a condensed commentary, the originality of which can be felt both on the formal and the contents levels. The aim of our study is to try, as much as possible, to show this originality, referring specially to Pappus commentary of the "Xth book", the works of R. Rashed on the history of algebra and a recent work of M. Ben Miled on the Arabic commentaries of the Xth book. It appears to us that the work of al-Khāzin concerning the Xth book, is situated in the current of an Arabic tradition identified, mainly due to the works of R. Rashed, by: - an algebraic representation of the geometrical work of Euclid, - a numerical interpretation of the Euclidian notions, rendered possible by the introduction of a unity for every kind of magnitude.

math.HO↗

Note Sur Le Choix Des Courbes Fait Par Al-Khayyam Dans Sa Resolution Des Equations Cubiques Et Comparaison Avec la Methode De Descartes

It is well known that Al-Khayâm, for the first time in history, formulated a complete theory to solve third degree equations using the intersection of geometric curves and moreover solved the fourteen types of equations using this method. His solution for these equations was either using the intersection of two parabolas, a parabola and a circle, a parabola and a hyperbola, a circle and a hyperbola or two hyperbolas. His style was purely synthetic lacking any analysis which may lead to deducing any motives for his choice of the curves. Our article is centered on a pointed detail which is the justification of the choice of these curves, knowing that R. Rashed studied this choice in all of the mentioned fourteen equations. As for Descartes, whose style is as synthetic as Al-Khayâm's, we ask the same question concerning the solution of the third degree equations, searching for any possible resemblance between the two methods of solution, both mathematicians having been motivated similarly in geometric resolutions. We noticed that the choice of the fourteen curves couples was made by Al Khayyâm regarding a uniform calculation technique that he applied systematically to each equation type among the fourteen. It has appeared that the choice of the curves made by Descartes is the result of distinct calculation techniques, even though the projects of the two mathematicians are of the same essence, and their motivations are the same: finding the solution of third degree equations using the intersection of conical curves and the equations of curves.

math.HO↗