arXiv subjects

Nidhi Rathi

Publications and source records attributed to Nidhi Rathi.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Power of Share-Based Notions in Proving Envy-Based Fairness Guarantees

We study the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods among agents with monotone valuations. We introduce a new share-based fairness notion, the residual maximin share (RMMS), and show that it provides a unified framework for several existing lone-divider style techniques in fair division. RMMS satisfies two key properties: feasibility and self-maximization. Using RMMS, we give simple proofs of the existence of partial allocations that are both RMMS and envy-free up to any good (EFX), and complete allocations that are both RMMS and envy-free up to one good (EF1), in fact satisfying the stronger notion of EFL. This unifies and strengthens several previously known results. We further demonstrate the power of the share-based approach by studying the compatibility of fairness notions related to the long-standing EFX problem. While allocations satisfying either epistemic EFX (EEFX) or EF1 are known to exist for general monotone valuations, whether they can always be achieved simultaneously has remained open in every setting where EFX existence itself is unresolved. For additive valuations, we resolve this question affirmatively by proving the existence of allocations that satisfy both EEFX and EFL. Our proof introduces the strong EEFX share, a new share notion implying EEFX feasibility of bundles. We show that the strong EEFX share is upper bounded by RMMS, enabling us to derive EEFX+EFL allocations via the RMMS framework. This answers the main open question of Akrami and Rathi (2025). Finally, although our algorithm for computing EEFX and EF1 allocations may take exponential time in general, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm for restricted additive valuations. Unlike the lone-divider approach, our algorithm exploits the structural properties of restricted additive valuations to compute allocations satisfying both EEFX and EF1.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

EFX Allocations and Orientations on Bipartite Multi-graphs: A Complete Picture

We consider the fundamental problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible items among agents having valuations that are represented by a multi-graph -- here, agents appear as vertices and items as edges between them and each vertex (agent) only values the set of its incident edges (items). The goal is to find a fair, i.e., envy-free up to any item (EFX) allocation. This model has recently been introduced by Christodoulou et al. (EC-23) where they show that EFX allocations always exist on simple graphs for monotone valuations, i.e., where any two agents can share at most one edge (item). A natural question arises as to what happens when we go beyond simple graphs and study various classes of multi-graphs? We answer the above question affirmatively for the valuation class of bipartite multi-graphs and multi-cycles. The main contribution of this work is to establish the existence of EFX allocations on bipartite multi-graphs for monotone valuations and on multi-cycles for MMS-feasible valuations. We also present pseudo-polynomial time algorithms to compute EFX allocations for the above settings. Furthermore, we show that for bipartite multi-graphs with cancelable valuations, EFX allocations can be computed in polynomial time. We thus widen the spectrum where EFX allocations are guaranteed to exist. Next, we study EFX orientations (allocations where every item is assigned to one of its two endpoint agents) and provide a complete characterization of their existence on bipartite multi-graphs in terms of two key parameters: (i) the number of edges shared between any two agents and (ii) the diameter of the graph. Finally, we prove that it is NP-complete to determine whether a given fair division instance on a bipartite multi-graph admits an EFX orientation, even with a constant number of agents.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Fair Division in a Variable Setting

We study fair division of indivisible items under a variable input setting, where the set of agents or items may change over time. Starting from an arbitrary allocation, the goal is to restore envy-freeness up to one item (EF1) through item transfers while causing as little disruption as possible. We formalize this via `valid transfers' and introduce the EF1-Restoration problem. We give efficient algorithms for EF1-Restoration when agents have identical monotone valuations and the items are either all goods or all chores. In contrast, even for identical additive valuations, we prove that optimizing the number of valid transfers is NP-hard. For the stronger notion of EFX, we show that deciding whether EFX-Restoration admits any positive solution is weakly NP-hard for identical additive valuations. We also show that, unlike the pure goods and pure chores cases, EF1-Restoration may be impossible for mixed manna. For additive binary valuations, we prove that deciding whether EF1-Restoration is possible is NP-hard, and so is finding the minimum number of valid transfers when restoration is possible. We complement these hardness results with a polynomial-time algorithm for the subclass of additive binary valuations defined using multigraphs, introduced by Christodoulou et al. (EC 2023), when allocations are required to be orientations. Finally, for monotone binary valuations, we prove that deciding whether EF1-Restoration is possible is PSPACE-complete. Together, our results give a broad complexity landscape for restoring EF1 under variable inputs across several natural valuation classes.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Achieving Maximin Share and EFX/EF1 Guarantees Simultaneously

We study the problem of computing \emph{fair} divisions of a set of indivisible goods among agents with \emph{additive} valuations. For the past many decades, the literature has explored various notions of fairness, that can be primarily seen as either having \emph{envy-based} or \emph{share-based} lens. For the discrete setting of resource-allocation problems, \emph{envy-free up to any good} (EFX) and \emph{maximin share} (MMS) are widely considered as the flag-bearers of fairness notions in the above two categories, thereby capturing different aspects of fairness herein. Due to lack of existence results of these notions and the fact that a good approximation of EFX or MMS does not imply particularly strong guarantees of the other, it becomes important to understand the compatibility of EFX and MMS allocations with one another. In this work, we identify a novel way to simultaneously achieve MMS guarantees with EFX/EF1 notions of fairness, while beating the best known approximation factors [Chaudhury et al., 2021, Amanatidis et al., 2020]. Our main contribution is to constructively prove the existence of (i) a partial allocation that is both $2/3$-MMS and EFX, and (ii) a complete allocation that is both $2/3$-MMS and EF1. Our algorithms run in pseudo-polynomial time if the approximation factor for MMS is relaxed to $2/3-\varepsilon$ for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$ and in polynomial time if, in addition, the EFX (or EF1) guarantee is relaxed to $(1-\delta)$-EFX (or $(1-\delta)$-EF1) for any constant $\delta>0$. In particular, we improve from the best approximation factor known prior to our work, which computes partial allocations that are $1/2$-MMS and EFX in pseudo-polynomial time [Chaudhury et al., 2021].

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Welfare-Optimal Serial Dictatorships have Polynomial Query Complexity

Serial dictatorship is a simple mechanism for coordinating agents in solving combinatorial optimization problems according to their preferences. The most representative such problem is one-sided matching, in which a set of n agents have values for a set of n items, and the objective is to compute a matching of the agents to the items of maximum total value (a.k.a., social welfare). Following the recent framework of Caragiannis and Rathi [10], we consider a model in which the agent-item values are not available upfront but become known by querying agent sequences. In particular, when the agents are asked to act in a sequence, they respond by picking their favorite item that has not been picked by agents who acted before and reveal their value for it. Can we compute an agent sequence that induces a social welfare-optimal matching? We answer this question affirmatively and present an algorithm that uses polynomial number (n^5) of queries. This solves the main open problem stated by Caragiannis and Rathi [CR23]. Our analysis uses a potential function argument that measures progress towards learning the underlying edge-weight information. Furthermore, the algorithm has a truthful implementation by adapting the paradigm of VCG payments.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Epistemic EFX Allocations Exist for Monotone Valuations

We study the fundamental problem of fairly dividing a set of indivisible items among agents with (general) monotone valuations. The notion of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) is considered to be one of the most fascinating fairness concepts in this line of work. Unfortunately, despite significant efforts, existence of EFX allocations is a major open problem in fair division, thereby making the study of approximations and relaxations of EFX a natural line of research. Recently, Caragiannis et al. introduced a promising relaxation of EFX, called epistemic EFX (EEFX). We say an allocation to be EEFX if, for every agent, it is possible to shuffle the items in the remaining bundles so that she becomes "EFX-satisfied". Caragiannis et al. prove existence and polynomial-time computability of EEFX allocations for additive valuations. A natural question asks what happens when we consider valuations more general than additive? We address this important open question and answer it affirmatively by establishing the existence of EEFX allocations for an arbitrary number of agents with general monotone valuations. To the best of our knowledge, EEFX is the only known relaxation of EFX (beside EF1) to have such strong existential guarantees. Furthermore, we complement our existential result by proving computational and information-theoretic lower bounds. We prove that even for an arbitrary number of (more than one) agents with identical submodular valuations, it is PLS-hard to compute EEFX allocations and it requires exponentially-many value queries to do so.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

On the complexity of Pareto-optimal and envy-free lotteries

We study the classic problem of dividing a collection of indivisible resources in a fair and efficient manner among a set of agents having varied preferences. Pareto optimality is a standard notion of economic efficiency, which states that it should be impossible to find an allocation that improves some agent's utility without reducing any other's. On the other hand, a fundamental notion of fairness in resource allocation settings is that of envy-freeness, which renders an allocation to be fair if every agent (weakly) prefers her own bundle over that of any other agent's bundle. Unfortunately, an envy-free allocation may not exist if we wish to divide a collection of indivisible items. Introducing randomness is a typical way of circumventing the non-existence of solutions, and therefore, allocation lotteries, i.e., distributions over allocations have been explored while relaxing the notion of fairness to ex-ante envy freeness. We consider a general fair division setting with $n$ agents and a family of admissible $n$-partitions of an underlying set of items. Every agent is endowed with partition-based utilities, which specify her cardinal utility for each bundle of items in every admissible partition. In such fair division instances, Cole and Tao (2021) have proved that an ex-ante envy-free and Pareto-optimal allocation lottery is always guaranteed to exist. We strengthen their result while examining the computational complexity of the above total problem and establish its membership in the complexity class PPAD. Furthermore, for instances with a constant number of agents, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm to find an ex-ante envy-free and Pareto-optimal allocation lottery. On the negative side, we prove that maximizing social welfare over ex-ante envy-free and Pareto-optimal allocation lotteries is NP-hard.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Optimally Interpolating between Ex-Ante Fairness and Welfare

For the fundamental problem of allocating a set of resources among individuals with varied preferences, the quality of an allocation relates to the degree of fairness and the collective welfare achieved. Unfortunately, in many resource-allocation settings, it is computationally hard to maximize welfare while achieving fairness goals. In this work, we consider ex-ante notions of fairness; popular examples include the \emph{randomized round-robin algorithm} and \emph{sortition mechanism}. We propose a general framework to systematically study the \emph{interpolation} between fairness and welfare goals in a multi-criteria setting. We develop two efficient algorithms ($\varepsilon-Mix$ and $Simple-Mix$) that achieve different trade-off guarantees with respect to fairness and welfare. $\varepsilon-Mix$ achieves an optimal multi-criteria approximation with respect to fairness and welfare, while $Simple-Mix$ achieves optimality up to a constant factor with zero computational overhead beyond the underlying \emph{welfare-maximizing mechanism} and the \emph{ex-ante fair mechanism}. Our framework makes no assumptions on either of the two underlying mechanisms, other than that the fair mechanism produces a distribution over the set of all allocations. Indeed, if these mechanisms are themselves approximation algorithms, our framework will retain the approximation factor, guaranteeing sensitivity to the quality of the underlying mechanisms, while being \emph{oblivious} to them. We also give an extensive experimental analysis for the aforementioned ex-ante fair mechanisms on real data sets, confirming our theoretical analysis.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Envy-Free Cake Cutting with Graph Constraints

We study the classic problem of fairly dividing a heterogeneous and divisible resource -- represented by a cake, $[0,1]$ -- among $n$ agents. This work considers an interesting variant of the problem where agents are embedded on a graph. The graphical constraint entails that each agent evaluates her allocated share only against her neighbor's share. Given a graph, the goal is to efficiently find a locally envy-free allocation where every agent values her share to be at least as much as any of her neighbor's share. The best known algorithm (by Aziz and Mackenzie) for finding envy-free cake divisions has a hyper-exponential query complexity. One of the key technical contributions of this work is to identify a non-trivial graph structure -- tree graphs with depth at-most two (Depth2Tree) -- on $n$ agents that admits a query efficient cake-cutting protocol (under the Robertson-Webb query model). In particular, we develop a discrete protocol that finds a locally envy-free allocation among $n$ agents on depth-two trees with at-most $O(n^3 \log(n))$ cuts on the cake. For the special case of Depth2Tree where every non-root agent is connected to at-most two agents (2-Star), we show that $O(n^2)$ queries suffice. We complement our algorithmic results with establishing a lower bound of $Ω(n^2)$ (evaluation) queries for finding a locally envy-free allocation among $n$ agents on a 1-Star graph (under the assumption that the root agent partitions the cake into $n$ connected pieces).

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

A Discrete and Bounded Locally Envy-Free Cake Cutting Protocol on Trees

We study the classic problem of \emph{fairly} dividing a heterogeneous and divisible resource -- modeled as a line segment $[0,1]$ and typically called as a \emph{cake} -- among $n$ agents. This work considers an interesting variant of the problem where agents are embedded on a graph. The graphical constraint entails that each agent evaluates her allocated share only against her neighbors' share. Given a graph, the goal is to efficiently find a \emph{locally envy-free} allocation where every agent values her share of the cake to be at least as much as that of any of her neighbors' share. The most significant contribution of this work is a bounded protocol that finds a locally envy-free allocation among $n$ agents on a tree graph using $n^{O(n)}$ queries under the standard Robertson-Webb (RW) query model. The query complexity of our proposed protocol, though exponential, significantly improves the currently best known hyper-exponential query complexity bound of Aziz and Mackenzie [AM16] for complete graphs. In particular, we also show that if the underlying tree graph has a depth of at most two, one can find a locally envy-free allocation with $O(n^4 \log n)$ RW queries. This is the first and the only known locally envy-free cake cutting protocol with polynomial query complexity for a non-trivial graph structure. Interestingly, our discrete protocols are simple and easy to understand, as opposed to highly involved protocol of [AM16]. This simplicity can be attributed to their recursive nature and the use of a single agent as a designated \emph{cutter}. We believe that these results will help us improve our algorithmic understanding of the arguably challenging problem of envy-free cake-cutting by uncovering the bottlenecks in its query complexity and its relation to the underlying graph structures.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Optimizing over Serial Dictatorships

Motivated by the success of the serial dictatorship mechanism in social choice settings, we explore its usefulness in tackling various combinatorial optimization problems. We do so by considering an abstract model, in which a set of agents are asked to act in a particular ordering, called the action sequence. Each agent acts in a way that gives her the maximum possible value, given the actions of the agents who preceded her in the action sequence. Our goal is to compute action sequences that yield approximately optimal total value to the agents (a.k.a., social welfare). We assume query access to the value $v_i(S)$ that the agent i gets when she acts after the agents in the ordered set $S$. We establish tight bounds on the social welfare that can be achieved using polynomially many queries. Even though these bounds show a marginally sublinear approximation of optimal social welfare in general, excellent approximations can be obtained when the valuations stem from an underlying combinatorial domain. Indicatively, when the valuations are defined using bipartite matchings, arborescences in directed graphs, and satisfiability of Boolean expressions, simple query-efficient algorithms yield $2$-approximations. We discuss issues related to truthfulness and show how some of our algorithms can be implemented truthfully using VCG-like payments. Finally, we introduce and study the price of serial dictatorship, a notion that provides an optimistic measure of the quality of combinatorial optimization solutions generated by action sequences.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

New Fairness Concepts for Allocating Indivisible Items

For the fundamental problem of fairly dividing a set of indivisible items among agents, envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) and maximin fairness (MMS) are arguably the most compelling fairness concepts proposed until now. Unfortunately, despite significant efforts over the past few years, whether EFX allocations always exist is still an enigmatic open problem, let alone their efficient computation. Furthermore, today we know that MMS allocations are not always guaranteed to exist. These facts weaken the usefulness of both EFX and MMS, albeit their appealing conceptual characteristics. We propose two alternative fairness concepts, called epistemic EFX (EEFX) and minimum EFX share fairness (MXS), inspired by EFX and MMS. For both, we explore their relationships to well-studied fairness notions and, more importantly, prove that EEFX and MXS allocations always exist and can be computed efficiently for additive valuations. Our results justify that the new fairness concepts can be excellent alternatives to EFX and MMS.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Fair and Efficient Cake Division with Connected Pieces

The classic cake-cutting problem provides a model for addressing fair and efficient allocation of a divisible, heterogeneous resource (metaphorically, the cake) among agents with distinct preferences. Focusing on a standard formulation of cake cutting, in which each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake, this work establishes algorithmic and hardness results for multiple fairness/efficiency measures. First, we consider the well-studied notion of envy-freeness and develop an efficient algorithm that finds a cake division (with connected pieces) wherein the envy is multiplicatively within a factor of 2+o(1). The same algorithm in fact achieves an approximation ratio of 3+o(1) for the problem of finding cake divisions with as large a Nash social welfare (NSW) as possible. NSW is another standard measure of fairness and this work also establishes a connection between envy-freeness and NSW: approximately envy-free cake divisions (with connected pieces) always have near-optimal Nash social welfare. Furthermore, we develop an approximation algorithm for maximizing the $ρ$-mean welfare--this unifying objective, with different values of $ρ$, interpolates between notions of fairness (NSW) and efficiency (average social welfare). Finally, we complement these algorithmic results by proving that maximizing NSW (and, in general, the $ρ$-mean welfare) is APX-hard in the cake-division context.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Fair Cake Division Under Monotone Likelihood Ratios

This work develops algorithmic results for the classic cake-cutting problem in which a divisible, heterogeneous resource (modeled as a cake) needs to be partitioned among agents with distinct preferences. We focus on a standard formulation of cake cutting wherein each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake. While multiple hardness results exist in this setup for finding fair/efficient cake divisions, we show that, if the value densities of the agents satisfy the monotone likelihood ratio property (MLRP), then strong algorithmic results hold for various notions of fairness and economic efficiency. Addressing cake-cutting instances with MLRP, first we develop an algorithm that finds cake divisions (with connected pieces) that are envy-free, up to an arbitrary precision. The time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in the number of agents and the bit complexity of an underlying Lipschitz constant. We obtain similar positive results for maximizing social (utilitarian) and egalitarian welfare. In addition, we show that, under MLRP, the problem of maximizing Nash social welfare admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS). Many distribution families bear MLRP. In particular, this property holds if all the value densities belong to any one of the following families: Gaussian (with the same variance), linear, binomial, Poisson, and exponential distributions. Furthermore, it is known that linear translations of any log-concave function satisfy MLRP. Therefore, our results also hold when the value densities of the agents are linear translations of the following (log-concave) distributions: Laplace, gamma, beta, Subbotin, chi-square, Dirichlet, and logistic. Hence, through MLRP, the current work obtains novel cake-cutting algorithms for multiple distribution families.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2018

Fair Division with a Secretive Agent

We study classic fair-division problems in a partial information setting. This paper respectively addresses fair division of rent, cake, and indivisible goods among agents with cardinal preferences. We will show that, for all of these settings and under appropriate valuations, a fair (or an approximately fair) division among n agents can be efficiently computed using only the valuations of n-1 agents. The nth (secretive) agent can make an arbitrary selection after the division has been proposed and, irrespective of her choice, the computed division will admit an overall fair allocation. For the rent-division setting we prove that the (well-behaved) utilities of n-1 agents suffice to find a rent division among n rooms such that, for every possible room selection of the secretive agent, there exists an allocation (of the remaining n-1 rooms among the n-1 agents) which ensures overall envy freeness (fairness). We complement this existential result by developing a polynomial-time algorithm that finds such a fair rent division under quasilinear utilities. In this partial information setting, we also develop efficient algorithms to compute allocations that are envy-free up to one good (EF1) and epsilon-approximate envy free. These two notions of fairness are applicable in the context of indivisible goods and divisible goods (cake cutting), respectively. This work also addresses fairness in terms of proportionality and maximin shares. Our key result here is an efficient algorithm that, even with a secretive agent, finds a 1/19-approximate maximin fair allocation (of indivisible goods) under submodular valuations of the non-secretive agents. One of the main technical contributions of this paper is the development of novel connections between different fair-division paradigms, e.g., we use our existential results for envy-free rent-division to develop an efficient EF1 algorithm.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2018

Fully Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes for Fair Rent Division

We study the problem of fair rent division that entails splitting the rent and allocating the rooms of an apartment among roommates (agents) in a fair manner. In this setup, a distribution of the rent and an allocation is said to be fair if it is envy free, i.e., under the imposed rents, no agent has a strictly stronger preference for any other agent's room. The cardinal preferences of the agents are expressed via functions which specify the utilities of the agents for the rooms at every possible room rent/price. While envy-free solutions are guaranteed to exist under reasonably general utility functions, efficient algorithms for finding them were known only for quasilinear utilities. This work addresses this notable gap and develops approximation algorithms for fair rent division with minimal assumptions on the utility functions. Specifically, we show that if the agents have continuous, monotone decreasing, and piecewise-linear utilities, then the fair rent-division problem admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS). That is, we develop algorithms that find allocations and prices of the rooms such that for each agent a the utility of the room assigned to it is within a factor of $(1 + ε)$ of the utility of the room most preferred by a. Here, $ε>0$ is an approximation parameter, and the running time of the algorithms is polynomial in $1/ε$ and the input size. In addition, we show that the methods developed in this work provide truthful mechanisms for special cases of the rent-division problem. Envy-free solutions correspond to equilibria of a two-sided matching market with monetary transfers; hence, this work also provides efficient algorithms for finding approximate equilibria in such markets. We complement the algorithmic results by proving that the fair rent division problem lies in the intersection of the complexity classes PPAD and PLS.

cs.GT↗