Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Nils Quetschlich

Publications and source records attributed to Nils Quetschlich.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Integrating Quantum Software Tools with(in) MLIR

Compilers transform code into action. They convert high-level programs into executable hardware instructions - a crucial step in enabling reliable and scalable quantum computation. However, quantum compilation is still in its infancy, and many existing solutions are ad hoc, often developed independently and from scratch. The resulting lack of interoperability leads to significant missed potential, as quantum software tools remain isolated and cannot be seamlessly integrated into cohesive toolchains. The Multi-Level Intermediate Representation (MLIR) has addressed analogous challenges in the classical domain. It was developed within the LLVM project, which has long powered robust software stacks and enabled compilation across diverse software and hardware components, with particular importance in high-performance computing environments. However, MLIR's steep learning curve poses a significant barrier to entry, particularly in quantum computing, where much of the software stack is still predominantly built by experimentalists out of necessity rather than by experienced software engineers. This paper provides a practical and hands-on guide for quantum software engineers to overcome this steep learning curve. Through a concrete case study linking Xanadu's PennyLane framework with the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT), we outline actionable integration steps, highlight best practices, and share hard-earned insights from real-world development. This work aims to support quantum tool developers in navigating MLIR's complexities and to foster its adoption as a unifying bridge across a rapidly growing ecosystem of quantum software tools, ultimately guiding the development of more modular, interoperable, and integrated quantum software stacks.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2025

An experience-based classification of quantum bugs in quantum software

As quantum computers continue to improve in quality and scale, there is a growing need for accessible software frameworks for programming them. However, the unique behavior of quantum systems means specialized approaches, beyond traditional software development, are required. This is particularly true for debugging due to quantum bugs, i.e., bugs that occur precisely because an algorithm is a quantum algorithm. Pinpointing a quantum bug's root cause often requires significant developer time, as there is little established guidance for quantum debugging techniques. Developing such guidance is the main challenge we sought to address. In this work, we describe a set of 14 quantum bugs, sourced primarily from our experience as quantum software developers, and supplemented by analysis of open-source GitHub repositories. We detail their context, symptoms, and the techniques applied to identify and fix them. While classifying these bugs based on existing schemes, we observed that most emerged due to unique interactions between multiple aspects of an algorithm or workflow. In other words, they occurred because more than one thing went wrong, which provided important insight into why quantum debugging is more challenging. Furthermore, based on this clustering, we found that - unexpectedly - there is no clear relationship between debugging strategies and bug classes. Further research is needed to develop effective and systematic quantum debugging strategies.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2025

Quantum Circuit Optimization for the Fault-Tolerance Era: Do We Have to Start from Scratch?

Quantum computing has made significant advancements in the last years in both hardware and software. Unfortunately, the currently available Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware is still heavily affected by noise. Many optimization techniques have been developed to reduce the negative effects thereof, which, however, only works up to a certain point. Therefore, scaling quantum applications from currently considered small research examples to industrial applications requires error-correction techniques to execute quantum circuits in a fault-tolerant fashion and enter the Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing (FTQC) era. These error-correction techniques introduce dramatic qubit overheads, leading to the requirement of tens of thousands of qubits already for toy-sized examples. Hence, quantum circuit optimization that reduces qubit overheads when shifting from the NISQ to the FTQC era is essential. This raises the question, whether we need to start from scratch, or whether current state-of-the-art optimization techniques can be used as a basis for this. To approach this question, this work investigates the effects of different optimization passes on a representative selection of quantum circuits. Since hardly any tools to automatically design and evaluate FTQC quantum circuits exist yet, we utilize resource estimation to compare the (potential) benefits gained by applying NISQ quantum circuit optimization to estimated FTQC resource requirements. The results indicate that, indeed, the estimated resource requirements for FTQC can be improved by applying NISQ quantum circuit optimization techniques. At the same time, more detailed investigations show what techniques lead to more benefits for FTQC compared to others, providing guidelines for the transfer of NISQ optimization techniques to the FTQC era.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2025

Improving Hardware Requirements for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing by Optimizing Error Budget Distributions

Despite significant progress in quantum computing in recent years, executing quantum circuits for practical problems remains challenging due to error-prone quantum hardware. Hence, quantum error correction becomes essential but induces significant overheads in qubits and execution time, often by orders of magnitude. Obviously, these overheads must be reduced. Since many quantum applications can tolerate some noise, end users can provide a maximum tolerated error, the error budget, to be considered during compilation and execution. This error budget, or, more precisely, its distribution, can be a key factor in achieving the overhead reduction. Conceptually, an error-corrected quantum circuit can be divided into different parts that each have a specific purpose. Errors can happen in any of these parts and their errors sum up to the mentioned error budget, but how to distribute it among them actually constitutes a degree of freedom. This work is based on the idea that some of the circuit parts can compensate for errors more efficiently than others. Consequently, these parts should contribute more to satisfy the total error budget than the parts where it is more costly. However, this poses the challenge of finding optimal distributions. We address this challenge not only by providing general guidelines on distributing the error budget, but also a method that automatically determines resource-efficient distributions for arbitrary circuits by training a machine learning model on an accumulated dataset. The approach is evaluated by analyzing the machine learning model's predictions on so far unseen data, reducing the estimated space-time costs for more than 75% of the considered quantum circuits, with an average reduction of 15.6%, including cases without improvement, and a maximum reduction of 77.7%.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2025

Improving Figures of Merit for Quantum Circuit Compilation

Quantum computing is an emerging technology that has seen significant software and hardware improvements in recent years. Executing a quantum program requires the compilation of its quantum circuit for a target Quantum Processing Unit (QPU). Various methods for qubit mapping, gate synthesis, and optimization of quantum circuits have been proposed and implemented in compilers. These compilers try to generate a quantum circuit that leads to the best execution quality - a criterion that is usually approximated by figures of merit such as the number of (two-qubit) gates, the circuit depth, expected fidelity, or estimated success probability. However, it is often unclear how well these figures of merit represent the actual execution quality on a QPU. In this work, we investigate the correlation between established figures of merit and actual execution quality on real machines - revealing that the correlation is weaker than anticipated and that more complex figures of merit are not necessarily more accurate. Motivated by this finding, we propose an improved figure of merit (based on a machine learning approach) that can be used to predict the expected execution quality of a quantum circuit for a chosen QPU without actually executing it. The employed machine learning model reveals the influence of various circuit features on generating high correlation scores. The proposed figure of merit demonstrates a strong correlation and outperforms all previous ones in a case study - achieving an average correlation improvement of 49%.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2024

Towards Equivalence Checking of Classical Circuits Using Quantum Computing

Quantum computers and quantum algorithms have made great strides in the last few years and promise improvements over classical computing for specific tasks. Although the current hardware is not yet ready to make real impacts at the time of writing, this will change over the coming years. To be ready for this, it is important to share knowledge of quantum computing in application domains where it is not yet represented. One such application is the verification of classical circuits, specifically, equivalence checking. Although this problem has been investigated over decades in an effort to overcome the verification gap, how it can potentially be solved using quantum computing has hardly been investigated yet. In this work, we address this question by considering a presumably straightforward approach: Using Grover's algorithm. However, we also show that, although this might be an obvious choice, there are several pitfalls to avoid in order to get meaningful results. This leads to the proposal of a working concept of a quantum computing methodology for equivalent checking providing the foundation for corresponding solutions in the (near) future.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2024

A Predictive Approach for Selecting the Best Quantum Solver for an Optimization Problem

Leveraging quantum computers for optimization problems holds promise across various application domains. Nevertheless, utilizing respective quantum computing solvers requires describing the optimization problem according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism and selecting a proper solver for the application of interest with a reasonable setting. Both demand significant proficiency in quantum computing, QUBO formulation, and quantum solvers, a background that usually cannot be assumed by end users who are domain experts rather than quantum computing specialists. While tools aid in QUBO formulations, support for selecting the best-solving approach remains absent. This becomes even more challenging because selecting the best solver for a problem heavily depends on the problem itself. In this work, we are accepting this challenge and propose a predictive selection approach, which aids end users in this task. To this end, the solver selection task is first formulated as a classification task that is suitable to be solved by supervised machine learning. Based on that, we then propose strategies for adjusting solver parameters based on problem size and characteristics. Experimental evaluations, considering more than 500 different QUBO problems, confirm the benefits of the proposed solution. In fact, we show that in more than 70% of the cases, the best solver is selected, and in about 90% of the problems, a solver in the top two, i.e., the best or its closest suboptimum, is selected. This exploration proves the potential of machine learning in quantum solver selection and lays the foundations for its automation, broadening access to quantum optimization for a wider range of users.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2024

Towards an Automatic Framework for Solving Optimization Problems with Quantum Computers

Optimizing objective functions stands to benefit significantly from leveraging quantum computers, promising enhanced solution quality across various application domains in the future. However, harnessing the potential of quantum solvers necessitates formulating problems according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model, demanding significant expertise in quantum computation and QUBO formulations. This expertise barrier limits access to quantum solutions. Fortunately, automating the conversion of conventional optimization problems into QUBO formulations presents a solution for promoting accessibility to quantum solvers. This article addresses the unmet need for a comprehensive automatic framework to assist users in utilizing quantum solvers for optimization tasks while preserving interfaces that closely resemble conventional optimization practices. The framework prompts users to specify variables, optimization criteria, as well as validity constraints and, afterwards, allows them to choose the desired solver. Subsequently, it automatically transforms the problem description into a format compatible with the chosen solver and provides the resulting solution. Additionally, the framework offers instruments for analyzing solution validity and quality. Comparative analysis against existing libraries and tools in the literature highlights the comprehensive nature of the proposed framework. Two use cases (the knapsack problem and linear regression) are considered to show the completeness and efficiency of the framework in real-world applications. Finally, the proposed framework represents a significant advancement towards automating quantum computing solutions and widening access to quantum optimization for a broader range of users.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2024

The MQT Handbook: A Summary of Design Automation Tools and Software for Quantum Computing

Quantum computers are becoming a reality and numerous quantum computing applications with a near-term perspective (e.g., for finance, chemistry, machine learning, and optimization) and with a long-term perspective (e.g., for cryptography or unstructured search) are currently being investigated. However, designing and realizing potential applications for these devices in a scalable fashion requires automated, efficient, and user-friendly software tools that cater to the needs of end users, engineers, and physicists at every level of the entire quantum software stack. Many of the problems to be tackled in that regard are similar to design problems from the classical realm for which sophisticated design automation tools have been developed in the previous decades. The Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT) is a collection of software tools for quantum computing developed by the Chair for Design Automation at the Technical University of Munich which explicitly utilizes this design automation expertise. Our overarching objective is to provide solutions for design tasks across the entire quantum software stack. This entails high-level support for end users in realizing their applications, efficient methods for the classical simulation, compilation, and verification of quantum circuits, tools for quantum error correction, support for physical design, and more. These methods are supported by corresponding data structures (such as decision diagrams) and core methods (such as SAT encodings/solvers). All of the developed tools are available as open-source implementations and are hosted on https://github.com/cda-tum.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2024

Towards Application-Aware Quantum Circuit Compilation

Quantum computing has made tremendous improvements in both software and hardware that have sparked interest in academia and industry to realize quantum computing applications. To this end, several steps are necessary: The underlying problem must be encoded in a quantum circuit, a suitable device must be selected to execute it, and it must be compiled accordingly. This compilation step has a significant influence on the quality of the resulting solution. However, current state-of-the-art compilation tools treat the quantum circuit as a sequence of instructions without considering the actual application it realizes -- wasting a yet untapped potential to increase the solution quality. In this work, a different approach is explored that explicitly incorporates the application considered and aims to optimize its solution quality during compilation. Initial results show the benefits of this approach: For an industry-inspired application of a quantum generative model, the proposed approach outperformed Qiskit's most-optimized compilation scheme and led to better solution quality. Therefore, this work presents a first step towards application-aware compilation.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2024

A Framework to Formulate Pathfinding Problems for Quantum Computing

With the applications of quantum computing becoming more and more widespread, finding ways that allow end users without experience in the field to apply quantum computers to solve their individual problems is becoming a crucial task. However, current optimization algorithms require problem instances to be posed in complex formats that are challenging to formulate, even for experts. In particular, the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism employed by many quantum optimization algorithms, such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), involves the mathematical rewriting of constraints under strict conditions. To facilitate this process, we propose a framework to automatically generate QUBO formulations for pathfinding problems. This framework allows users to translate their specific problem instances into formulations that can be passed directly to quantum algorithms for optimization without requiring any expertise in the field of quantum computing. It supports three different encoding schemes that can easily be compared without requiring manual reformulation efforts. The resulting QUBO formulations are robust and efficient, reducing the previously tedious and error-prone reformulation process to a task that can be completed in a matter of seconds. In addition to an open-source Python package available on https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qubomaker, we also provide a graphical user interface accessible through the web (https://cda-tum.github.io/mqt-qubomaker/), which can be used to operate the framework without requiring the end user to write any code.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2024

Utilizing Resource Estimation for the Development of Quantum Computing Applications

Quantum computing has made considerable progress in recent years in both software and hardware. But to unlock the power of quantum computers in solving problems that cannot be efficiently solved classically, quantum computing at scale is necessary. Unfortunately, quantum simulators suffer from their exponential complexity and, at the same time, the currently available quantum computing hardware is still rather limited (even if roadmaps make intriguing promises). Hence, in order to evaluate quantum computing applications, end-users are still frequently restricted to toy-size problem instances (which additionally often do not take error correction into account). This substantially hinders the development and assessment of real-world quantum computing applications. In this work, we demonstrate how to utilize Resource Estimation to improve this situation. We show how the current workflow (relying on simulation and/or execution) can be complemented with an estimation step, allowing that end-users (1) actually can consider real-world problem instances already today (also considering error correction schemes and correspondingly required hardware resources), (2) can start exploring possible optimizations of those instances across the entire design space, and (3) can incorporate hypotheses of hardware development trends to derive more informed and, thus, better design space parameters. Overall, this enables end-users already today to check out the promises of possible future quantum computing applications, even if the corresponding hardware to execute them is not available yet.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2023

MQT Predictor: Automatic Device Selection with Device-Specific Circuit Compilation for Quantum Computing

Fueled by recent accomplishments in quantum computing hardware and software, an increasing number of problems from various application domains are being explored as potential use cases for this new technology. Similarly to classical computing, realizing an application on a particular quantum device requires the corresponding (quantum) circuit to be compiled so that it can be executed on the device. With a steadily growing number of available devices and a wide variety of different compilation tools, the number of choices to consider when trying to realize an application is quickly exploding. Due to missing tool support and automation, especially end-users who are not quantum computing experts are easily left unsupported and overwhelmed. In this work, we propose a methodology that allows one to automatically select a suitable quantum device for a particular application and provides an optimized compiler for the selected device. The resulting framework -- called the MQT Predictor -- not only supports end-users in navigating the vast landscape of choices, it also allows mixing and matching compiler passes from various tools to create optimized compilers that transcend the individual tools. Evaluations of an exemplary framework instantiation based on more than 500 quantum circuits and seven devices have shown that -- compared to both Qiskit's and TKET's most optimized compilation flows for all devices -- the MQT Predictor produces circuits within the top-3 out of 14 baselines in more than 98% of cases while frequently outperforming any tested combination by up to 53% when optimizing for expected fidelity. MQT Predictor is publicly available as open-source on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-predictor) and as an easy-to-use Python package (https://pypi.org/p/mqt.predictor).

quant-ph↗
arXiv2023

A Hybrid Classical Quantum Computing Approach to the Satellite Mission Planning Problem

Hundreds of satellites equipped with cameras orbit the Earth to capture images from locations for various purposes. Since the field of view of the cameras is usually very narrow, the optics have to be adjusted and rotated between single shots of different locations. This is even further complicated by the fixed speed -- determined by the satellite's altitude -- such that the decision what locations to select for imaging becomes even more complex. Therefore, classical algorithms for this Satellite Mission Planning Problem (SMPP) have already been proposed decades ago. However, corresponding classical solutions have only seen evolutionary enhancements since then. Quantum computing and its promises, on the other hand, provide the potential for revolutionary improvement. Therefore, in this work, we propose a hybrid classical quantum computing approach to solve the SMPP combining the advantages of quantum hardware with decades of classical optimizer development. Using the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), and its warm-start variant (W-QAOA), we demonstrate the applicability of solving the SMPP for up to 21 locations to choose from. This proof-of-concept -- which is available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-problemsolver) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT) -- showcases the potential of quantum computing in this application domain and represents a first step toward competing with classical algorithms in the future.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2023

Reducing the Compilation Time of Quantum Circuits Using Pre-Compilation on the Gate Level

In order to implement a quantum computing application, problem instances must be encoded into a quantum circuit and then compiled for a specific platform. The lengthy compilation process is a key bottleneck in this workflow, especially for problems that arise repeatedly with a similar yet distinct structure (each of which requires a new compilation run thus far). In this paper, we aim to overcome this bottleneck by proposing a comprehensive pre-compilation technique that tries to minimize the time spent for compiling recurring problems while preserving the solution quality as much as possible. The following concepts underpin the proposed approach: Beginning with a problem class and a corresponding quantum algorithm, a predictive encoding scheme is applied to encode a representative problem instance into a general-purpose quantum circuit for that problem class. Once the real problem instance is known, the previously constructed circuit only needs to be adjusted -- with (nearly) no compilation necessary. Experimental evaluations on QAOA for the MaxCut problem as well as a case study involving a satellite mission planning problem show that the proposed approach significantly reduces the compilation time by several orders of magnitude compared to Qiskit's compilation schemes while maintaining comparable compiled circuit quality. All implementations are available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-problemsolver) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).

quant-ph↗
arXiv2022

Recommending Solution Paths for Solving Optimization Problems with Quantum Computing

Solving real-world optimization problems with quantum computing requires choosing between a large number of options concerning formulation, encoding, algorithm and hardware. Finding good solution paths is challenging for end users and researchers alike. We propose a framework designed to identify and recommend the best-suited solution paths. This introduces a novel abstraction layer that is required to make quantum-computing-assisted solution techniques accessible to end users without requiring a deeper knowledge of quantum technologies. State-of-the-art hybrid algorithms, encoding and decomposition techniques can be integrated in a modular manner and evaluated using problem-specific performance metrics. Equally, tools for the graphical analysis of variational quantum algorithms are developed. Classical, fault tolerant quantum and quantum-inspired methods can be included as well to ensure a fair comparison resulting in useful solution paths. We demonstrate and validate our approach on a selected set of options and illustrate its application on the capacitated vehicle routing problem (CVRP). We also identify crucial requirements and the major design challenges for the proposed automation layer within a quantum-assisted solution workflow for optimization problems.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2022

Compiler Optimization for Quantum Computing Using Reinforcement Learning

Any quantum computing application, once encoded as a quantum circuit, must be compiled before being executable on a quantum computer. Similar to classical compilation, quantum compilation is a sequential process with many compilation steps and numerous possible optimization passes. Despite the similarities, the development of compilers for quantum computing is still in its infancy -- lacking mutual consolidation on the best sequence of passes, compatibility, adaptability, and flexibility. In this work, we take advantage of decades of classical compiler optimization and propose a reinforcement learning framework for developing optimized quantum circuit compilation flows. Through distinct constraints and a unifying interface, the framework supports the combination of techniques from different compilers and optimization tools in a single compilation flow. Experimental evaluations show that the proposed framework -- set up with a selection of compilation passes from IBM's Qiskit and Quantinuum's TKET -- significantly outperforms both individual compilers in 73% of cases regarding the expected fidelity. The framework is available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/MQTPredictor) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).

quant-ph↗
arXiv2022

Towards an Automated Framework for Realizing Quantum Computing Solutions

Quantum computing is fast evolving as a technology due to recent advances in hardware, software, as well as the development of promising applications. To use this technology for solving specific problems, a suitable quantum algorithm has to be determined, the problem has to be encoded in a form suitable for the chosen algorithm, it has to be executed, and the result has to be decoded. To date, each of these tedious and error-prone steps is conducted in a mostly manual fashion. This creates a high entry barrier for using quantum computing -- especially for users with little to no expertise in that domain. In this work, we envision a framework that aims to lower this entry barrier by allowing users to employ quantum computing solutions in an automatic fashion. To this end, interfaces as similar as possible to classical solvers are provided, while the quantum steps of the workflow are shielded from the user as much as possible by a fully automated backend. To demonstrate the feasibility and usability of such a framework, we provide proof-of-concept implementations for two different classes of problems which are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/MQTProblemSolver) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT). By this, this work provides the foundation for a low-threshold approach realizing quantum computing solutions with no or only moderate expertise in this technology.

quant-ph↗