arXiv subjects

Nima Naderloui

Publications and source records attributed to Nima Naderloui.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Revisiting Privacy Leakage in Machine Unlearning: Membership Inference Beyond the Forgotten Set

Machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a key mechanism for ensuring data privacy and regulatory compliance by enabling models to forget specific training samples. However, recent studies have shown that the removal of data can inadvertently introduce privacy leakages to the retain set,i.e., data that remain in the model after unlearning. In this paper, we extend the scope of privacy analysis in unlearning to the often-overlooked retained data. We introduce TC-UMIA, the first tri-class unlearning membership inference attack. TC-UMIA is a population-level inference framework that leverages model predictions before and after unlearning to distinguish among the forget, retain, and unseen set. Extensive experiments on five state-of-the-art unlearning algorithms and six real-world datasets demonstrate that: (i) unlearning can introduce additional privacy risks to the retain set, making it more susceptible to membership inference attacks; (ii) TC-UMIA is effective across a wide range of model architectures, datasets, and MU approaches. Beyond launching the attack, we rigorously evaluate three defense mechanisms, namely label-only outputs, dropout, and differential privacy, to mitigate the privacy risks posed by TC- UMIA. Our results reveal a fundamental trade-off between privacy protection and model accuracy, with the dropout approach offering the most favorable balance.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

SoK: Systematizing LLM Prompt Security: Taxonomies, Datasets, and Unified Evaluation of Attacks and Defenses

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as interfaces to information, code, and real-world services, making prompt-level security failures a practical concern. Although jailbreak attacks, defenses, datasets, and automated judgers have advanced rapidly, evaluation remains fragmented across threat models, access assumptions, cost budgets, datasets, and success criteria. This makes reported attack success rates and defense gains hard to compare. This SoK systematizes LLM prompt security across concepts, data, tooling, and measurement. We propose linked taxonomies for jailbreak attacks, defenses, and model vulnerabilities, while separating technical mechanisms from attacker and defender capabilities. We also formalize threat, access, and cost assumptions as explicit evaluation metadata. To support reproducible evaluation, we release JailbreakDB, PromptSecurity-Eval, and PromptSecurity, a modular platform that represents each experiment as a tuple of model, attack, defense, dataset, and judger. Using matched evaluations across models, attacks, defenses, and judgers, we show that access regime, native harmful-query behavior, attack cost, defense backfire, taxonomy subcategory, and judger choice all materially affect security conclusions. Together, these artifacts support reproducible, cost-aware, and taxonomy-grounded evaluation of LLM prompt security. Leaderboard: https://datasec-lab.github.io/PromptSecurityLeaderboard/. Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/youbin2014/JailbreakDB. GitHub: https://github.com/datasec-lab/PromptSecurity.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Rectifying Privacy and Efficacy Measurements in Machine Unlearning: A New Inference Attack Perspective

Machine unlearning focuses on efficiently removing specific data from trained models, addressing privacy and compliance concerns with reasonable costs. Although exact unlearning ensures complete data removal equivalent to retraining, it is impractical for large-scale models, leading to growing interest in inexact unlearning methods. However, the lack of formal guarantees in these methods necessitates the need for robust evaluation frameworks to assess their privacy and effectiveness. In this work, we first identify several key pitfalls of the existing unlearning evaluation frameworks, e.g., focusing on average-case evaluation or targeting random samples for evaluation, incomplete comparisons with the retraining baseline. Then, we propose RULI (Rectified Unlearning Evaluation Framework via Likelihood Inference), a novel framework to address critical gaps in the evaluation of inexact unlearning methods. RULI introduces a dual-objective attack to measure both unlearning efficacy and privacy risks at a per-sample granularity. Our findings reveal significant vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art unlearning methods, where RULI achieves higher attack success rates, exposing privacy risks underestimated by existing methods. Built on a game-based foundation and validated through empirical evaluations on both image and text data (spanning tasks from classification to generation), RULI provides a rigorous, scalable, and fine-grained methodology for evaluating unlearning techniques.

cs.CR↗