arXiv subjects

Nina Hosseini-Kivanani

Publications and source records attributed to Nina Hosseini-Kivanani.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Speaker-Specific and Language-Dependent Temporal Organization in Bilingual Political Speech

Speech rhythm helps structure persuasive speech, but most empirical work examines monolingual English. This study asks how politicians organize timing when speaking Luxembourgish and French. We analyze 400 sentences from ten politicians, annotated for segments and pauses. We compute rhythm metrics, including means, variability, and pairwise variability indices for consonants and vowels. We quantify speaker and language contributions and test within-speaker language effects with paired t-tests. Results show that consonant-based metrics retain speaker-specific signatures, whereas vowel-based metrics are largely driven by language choice. French tokens display longer and more variable vowels and vocalic intervals, while consonant timing differences are smaller. No robust language by gender interactions emerge. These findings show that language choice systematically reorganizes rhythmic timing in bilingual public speech.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Speaker or Language? Explaining Variance in Charismatic Prosody Across Luxembourgish and French

Charismatic speech is shaped by language and speaking style, yet their relative contribution in bilingual public speaking remains unclear. We analyzed spontaneous speeches of 10 politicians who address audiences in Luxembourgish and French, in highly comparable communicative contexts across languages. From 400 utterances, we extracted 41 acoustic-prosodic features linked to vocal charisma and fitted mixed-effects models to separate speaker- and language-related variance. Speaker identity accounted for most variance, whereas language explained less, but still showed systematic differences: French productions showed higher shimmer and phrase-final F0, indicative of a polite, respectful voice, while Luxembourgish productions exhibited stronger mid-frequency spectral energy, suggesting a more vocally present profile. These patterns align with the sociolinguistic roles of Luxembourgish as an informal identity language and French as a high-prestige institutional variety.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Simple Language Normalization Wins: Cross-Lingual Speaker Verification for the TidyVoice 2026 Challenge

Cross-lingual mismatch remains a key source of overall degradation in modern speaker verification. The TidyVoice2026 Challenge targets this setting with text-independent verification, comprising 3,666 training and 808 development speakers in 40 languages and 2,200 evaluation speakers in 38 unseen languages, without language labels at test time. Starting from the official SimAM-ResNet34 baseline pretrained on VoxBlink2 and VoxCeleb2 and fine-tuned on TidyVoice, we revisit Nuisance Attribute Projection (NAP) as a simple language-normalization step in the embedding space. We estimate a compact language subspace from cross-language same-speaker differences and project embeddings onto its orthogonal complement before cosine scoring with Adaptive Symmetric score normalization. This reduces development EER from 2.97\% with cosine and 2.70\% with AS-Norm to 2.18\% and yields a Codabench evaluation score of 8.40, showing that simple back-end language normalization can rival more complex systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

LuxEmo: Expressive Text-to-Speech Corpus for Luxembourgish

State-of-the-art speech datasets predominantly focus on widely spoken languages, often overlooking low-resource languages such as Luxembourgish, which remain underrepresented in speech technology research. In this work, we introduce LuxEmo, a 21-hour conversational expressive speech corpus for Luxembourgish with 4 emotion categories. LuxEmo is derived from Radio Télévision Luxembourg (RTL) youth broadcasts, using automated detection followed by human validation. We propose a semi-automatic curation workflow combining voice activity detection, denoising, language identification, LuxASR-based segmentation, automatic emotion prediction, lexical cues, and targeted human review. Additionally, we benchmark five expressive TTS systems covering German-based cross-lingual transfer, multilingual Luxembourgish support, Luxembourgish adaptation, and non-parametric prosody transfer. Performance is evaluated using both objective metrics and human evaluation.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

LuxSQA: Ask Me in Luxembourgish with TTS-Augmented Spoken Question Answering

Spoken Question Answering (SQA) remains largely focused on high-resource languages and carefully recorded speech, limiting the reach of speech-LLM methods in low-resource settings. This paper investigates whether text-to-speech (TTS) can provide task-specific training data for Luxembourgish SQA without requiring a large human-recorded QA corpus. Starting from existing text-based QA resources, we translate questions into Luxembourgish, synthesize spoken questions with multiple TTS systems, and pair them with textual answers. We train a parameter-efficient SLAM-style architecture that connects a frozen Whisper encoder to frozen multilingual LLM backends through a learned projector and LoRA adapters. We compare MMS-TTS, Qwen3-TTS, and OmniVoice variants, including single-source corpora of about 48k questions and a 4TTS multi-source mix of approximately 230k questions. Evaluation on LLAMA-LB-Test with two real Luxembourgish speaker conditions shows that multi-source and voice-design-based synthetic training configurations yield the strongest SQA performance. The results also show that no-reference TTS quality scores do not monotonically predict downstream QA performance, indicating that synthetic speech must be evaluated as task-specific training data rather than only as natural-sounding audio.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Do LLMs Know What Luxembourgish Borrows? Probing Lexical Neology in Low-Resource Multilingual Models

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for writing assistance in small contact languages, yet it is unclear whether they respect community norms around lexical borrowing and neology. We introduce LexNeo-Bench, a 3{,}050-instance token-level benchmark derived from LuxBorrow, a large-scale Luxembourgish news corpus, where target tokens are labelled as native or as French, German, or English borrowings. Using this benchmark, we probe three multilingual LLMs across 34 prompt settings on two tasks: borrowing type classification and a binary lexical-innovation proxy (borrowing versus native). Without external context, models perform only slightly above chance on borrowing classification, so we construct a linguistic knowledge graph that encodes donor language, morphological patterns, and lexical analogues, and inject instance-specific subgraphs into the prompt. Knowledge-graph prompts raise borrowing classification accuracy from 25 -- 35\% up to 71 -- 81\% and largely close the gap between small and large models, while leaving neology detection difficult and sensitive to few-shot design. Our results show that lexicon-aware prompting is highly beneficial for robust borrowing judgments in low-resource contact languages and that lexical resources can serve as structured context for LLM evaluation. This study was carried out within the ENEOLI COST Action and examines borrowing as a form of lexical innovation in multilingual Luxembourgish data.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

PolyFrame at MWE-2026 AdMIRe 2: When Words Are Not Enough: Multimodal Idiom Disambiguation

Multimodal models struggle with idiomatic expressions due to their non-compositional meanings, a challenge amplified in multilingual settings. We introduced PolyFrame, our system for the MWE-2026 AdMIRe2 shared task on multimodal idiom disambiguation, featuring a unified pipeline for both image+text ranking (Subtask A) and text-only caption ranking (Subtask B). All model variants retain frozen CLIP-style vision--language encoders and the multilingual BGE M3 encoder, training only lightweight modules: a logistic regression and LLM-based sentence-type predictor, idiom synonym substitution, distractor-aware scoring, and Borda rank fusion. Starting from a CLIP baseline (26.7% Top-1 on English dev, 6.7% on English test), adding idiom-aware paraphrasing and explicit sentence-type classification increased performance to 60.0% Top-1 on English and 60.0% Top-1 (0.822 NDCG@5) in zero-shot transfer to Portuguese. On the multilingual blind test, our systems achieved average Top-1/NDCG scores of 0.35/0.73 for Subtask A and 0.32/0.71 for Subtask B across 15 languages. Ablation results highlight idiom-aware rewriting as the main contributor to performance, while sentence-type prediction and multimodal fusion enhance robustness. These findings suggest that effective idiom disambiguation is feasible without fine-tuning large multimodal encoders.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

LuxBorrow: From Pompier to Pompjee, Tracing Borrowing in Luxembourgish

We present LuxBorrow, a borrowing-first analysis of Luxembourgish (LU) news spanning 27 years (1999-2025), covering 259,305 RTL articles and 43.7M tokens. Our pipeline combines sentence-level language identification (LU/DE/FR/EN) with a token-level borrowing resolver restricted to LU sentences, using lemmatization, a collected loanword registry, and compiled morphological and orthographic rules. Empirically, LU remains the matrix language across all documents, while multilingual practice is pervasive: 77.1% of articles include at least one donor language and 65.4% use three or four. Breadth does not imply intensity: median code-mixing index (CMI) increases from 3.90 (LU+1) to only 7.00 (LU+3), indicating localized insertions rather than balanced bilingual text. Domain and period summaries show moderate but persistent mixing, with CMI rising from 6.1 (1999-2007) to a peak of 8.4 in 2020. Token-level adaptations total 25,444 instances and exhibit a mixed profile: morphological 63.8%, orthographic 35.9%, lexical 0.3%. The most frequent individual rules are orthographic, such as on->oun and eur->er, while morphology is collectively dominant. Diachronically, code-switching intensifies, and morphologically adapted borrowings grow from a small base. French overwhelmingly supplies adapted items, with modest growth for German and negligible English. We advocate borrowing-centric evaluation, including borrowed token and type rates, donor entropy over borrowed items, and assimilation ratios, rather than relying only on document-level mixing indices.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

A Parallel Cross-Lingual Benchmark for Multimodal Idiomaticity Understanding

Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community. As such, they constitute an interesting challenge for assessing the linguistic (and to some extent cultural) capabilities of NLP systems. In this paper, we present XMPIE, a parallel multilingual and multimodal dataset of potentially idiomatic expressions. The dataset, containing 34 languages and over ten thousand items, allows comparative analyses of idiomatic patterns among language-specific realisations and preferences in order to gather insights about shared cultural aspects. This parallel dataset allows to evaluate model performance for a given PIE in different languages and whether idiomatic understanding in one language can be transferred to another. Moreover, the dataset supports the study of PIEs across textual and visual modalities, to measure to what extent PIE understanding in one modality transfers or implies in understanding in another modality (text vs. image). The data was created by language experts, with both textual and visual components crafted under multilingual guidelines, and each PIE is accompanied by five images representing a spectrum from idiomatic to literal meanings, including semantically related and random distractors. The result is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating multilingual and multimodal idiomatic language understanding.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

50 questions on Active Assisted Living technologies. Global edition

This booklet on Active Assisted Living (AAL) technologies has been created as part of the GoodBrother COST Action, which has run from 2020 to 2024. COST Actions are European research programs that promote collaboration across borders, uniting researchers, professionals, and institutions to address key societal challenges. GoodBrother focused on ethical and privacy concerns surrounding video and audio monitoring in care settings. The aim was to ensure that while AAL technologies help older adults and vulnerable individuals, their privacy and data protection rights remain a top priority. This booklet is designed to guide you through the role that AAL technologies play in improving the quality of life for older adults, caregivers, and people with disabilities. AAL technologies offer tools for those facing cognitive or physical challenges. They can enhance independence, assist with daily routines, and promote a safer living environment. However, the rise of these technologies also brings important questions about data protection and user autonomy. This resource is intended for a wide audience, including end users, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. It provides practical guidance on integrating AAL technologies into care settings while safeguarding privacy and ensuring ethical use. The insights offered here aim to empower users and caregivers to make informed choices that enhance both the quality of care and respect for personal autonomy.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2021

Experiments of ASR-based mispronunciation detection for children and adult English learners

Pronunciation is one of the fundamentals of language learning, and it is considered a primary factor of spoken language when it comes to an understanding and being understood by others. The persistent presence of high error rates in speech recognition domains resulting from mispronunciations motivates us to find alternative techniques for handling mispronunciations. In this study, we develop a mispronunciation assessment system that checks the pronunciation of non-native English speakers, identifies the commonly mispronounced phonemes of Italian learners of English, and presents an evaluation of the non-native pronunciation observed in phonetically annotated speech corpora. In this work, to detect mispronunciations, we used a phone-based ASR implemented using Kaldi. We used two non-native English labeled corpora; (i) a corpus of Italian adults contains 5,867 utterances from 46 speakers, and (ii) a corpus of Italian children consists of 5,268 utterances from 78 children. Our results show that the selected error model can discriminate correct sounds from incorrect sounds in both native and nonnative speech, and therefore can be used to detect pronunciation errors in non-native speech. The phone error rates show improvement in using the error language model. The ASR system shows better accuracy after applying the error model on our selected corpora.

cs.CL↗