Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Nirmal Chandra Rout

Publications and source records attributed to Nirmal Chandra Rout.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Further bounds on $q$-numerical radius of Hilbert space operators

In this article, we developed a series of new inequalities involving the $q$-numerical radius for operators and $2\times 2$ operator matrices. These inequalities serve to establish both lower and upper bounds for the $q$-numerical radius of operators. Additionally, we established $q$-numerical radius inequalities for operators via Buzano inequality.

math.FA↗

A note on numerical ranges of tensors

Theory of numerical range and numerical radius for tensors is not studied much in the literature. In 2016, Ke {\it et al.} [Linear Algebra Appl., 508 (2016) 100-132] introduced first the notion of numerical range of a tensor via the $k$-mode product. However, the convexity of the numerical range via the $k$-mode product was not proved by them. In this paper, the notion of numerical range and numerical radius for even-order square tensors using inner product via the Einstein product are introduced first. We provide some sufficient conditions using numerical radius for a tensor to being unitary. The convexity of the numerical range is also proved. We also provide an algorithm to plot the numerical range of a tensor. Furthermore, some properties of the numerical range for the Moore--Penrose inverse of a tensor are discussed.

math.RA↗

Further results on $\mathbb{A}$-numerical radius inequalities

Let $A$ be a bounded linear positive operator on a complex Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}.$ Further, let $\mathcal{B}_A\mathcal{(H)}$ denote the set of all bounded linear operators on $\mathcal{H}$ whose $A$-adjoint exists, and $\mathbb{A}$ signify a diagonal operator matrix with diagonal entries are $A.$ Very recently, several $A$-numerical radius inequalities of $2\times 2 $ operator matrices were established by Feki and Sahoo [arXiv:2006.09312; 2020] and Bhunia {\it et al.} [Linear Multilinear Algebra (2020), DOI: 10.1080/03081087.2020.1781037], assuming the conditions "$\mathcal{N}(A)^\perp$ is invariant under different operators in $\mathcal{B}_A(\mathcal{H})$" and "$A$ is strictly positive", respectively. In this paper, we prove a few new $\mathbb{A}$-numerical radius inequalities for $2\times 2$ and $n\times n$ operator matrices. We also provide some new proofs of the existing results by relaxing different sufficient conditions like "$\mathcal{N}(A)^\perp$ is invariant under different operators" and "$A$ is strictly positive". Our proofs show the importance of the theory of the Moore-Penrose inverse of a bounded linear operator in this field of study.

math.FA↗

On A-numerical radius inequalities for $2 \times 2$ operator matrices

Let ($\mathcal{H}, \langle . , .\rangle )$ be a complex Hilbert space and $A$ be a positive bounded linear operator on it. Let $w_A(T)$ be the $A$-numerical radius and $\|T\|_A$ be the $A$-operator seminorm of an operator $T$ acting on the semi-Hilbertian space $(\mathcal{H}, \langle .,.\rangle_A),$ where $\langle x, y\rangle_A:=\langle Ax, y\rangle$ for all $x,y\in \mathcal{H}$. In this article, we establish several upper and lower bounds for $B$-numerical radius of $2\times 2$ operator matrices, where $B=\begin{bmatrix} A & 0 0 & A \end{bmatrix}$. Further, we prove some refinements of earlier $A$-numerical radius inequalities for operators.

math.FA↗