SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Nitesh Saxena

Publications and source records attributed to Nitesh Saxena.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Beyond Decision Boundaries: Relational Geometry Attacks on Contrastive Embedding Manifolds

Contrastive learning and Siamese embedding models have become the foundation of modern verification systems, where decisions are governed not by discrete classification boundaries, but by relational geometry in embedding space. However, existing adversarial attacks remain fundamentally classification-centric, overlooking the vulnerability of relational geometry. In this paper, we introduce a geometry-aware adversarial attack framework that reformulates attacks on contrastive systems as manifold-level relational corruption. Instead of targeting individual predictions, the proposed framework systematically distorts similarity organization within the embedding manifold by pushing positive pairs apart while simultaneously pulling negative pairs closer, ultimately collapsing and inverting pairwise similarity structure. To enable scalable deployment, we shift iterative online optimization into an offline adversarial geometry deformation prior learning stage and train a lightweight feed-forward generator that learns generalized geometry deformation patterns from the victim model. Once trained, the generator produces adversarial perturbations through a single forward pass without requiring online gradient computation, enabling real-time online attacks against similarity-based verification systems. Experimental results across multiple verification architectures demonstrate substantial degradation of verification performance together with severe manifold-level relational corruption. On the Markmatch verification system, the proposed attack reduces accuracy from 95.4% to 38.6% while completely reversing the positive-negative similarity structure.

cs.AI

Broken Access: On the Challenges of Screen Reader Assisted Two-Factor and Passwordless Authentication

In today's technology-driven world, web services have opened up new opportunities for blind and visually impaired people to interact independently. Securing interactions with these services is crucial; however, currently deployed authentication mainly concentrate on sighted users, overlooking the needs of the blind and visually impaired community. In this paper, we address this gap by investigating the security and accessibility aspects of these authentication when adopted by blind and visually impaired users. We model web authentication for such users as screen reader assisted authentication and introduce an evaluation framework called AWARE. Using AWARE, we then systematically assessed popular PC and smartphone-based screen readers against different authentication methods, including variants of 2FA and passwordless schemes, to simulate real-world scenarios. We analyzed these screen reader assisted authentication interactions with authentication methods in three settings: using a terminal (PC) with screen readers, a combination of the terminal (PC) and smartphone with screen readers, and smartphones with integrated screen readers. The results of our study underscore weaknesses in all of our observed screen reader assisted scenarios for real-life authentication methods. These weaknesses, encompassing specific accessibility issues caused by imprecise screen reader instructions, highlight vulnerability concerning observed scenarios for both real-world and research literature based attacks, including phishing, concurrency, fatigue, cross-service, and shoulder surfing. Broadly, our AWARE framework can be used by designers as a precursor to user studies which are typically time-consuming and tedious to perform, independently allowing to unfold security and accessibility problems early which designers can address prior to full-fledged user testing of more isolated issues.

cs.CR

LiteLMGuard: Seamless and Lightweight On-Device Prompt Filtering for Safeguarding Small Language Models against Quantization-induced Risks and Vulnerabilities

The growing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has influenced the development of Small Language Models (SLMs) for on-device deployment across smartphones and edge devices, offering enhanced privacy, reduced latency, server-free functionality, and improved user experience. However, due to on-device resource constraints, SLMs undergo size optimization through compression techniques like quantization, which inadvertently introduce fairness, ethical and privacy risks. Critically, quantized SLMs may respond to harmful queries directly, without requiring adversarial manipulation, raising significant safety and trust concerns. To address this, we propose LiteLMGuard, an on-device guardrail that provides real-time, prompt-level defense for quantized SLMs. Additionally, our guardrail is designed to be model-agnostic such that it can be seamlessly integrated with any SLM, operating independently of underlying architectures. Our LiteLMGuard formalizes deep learning (DL)-based prompt filtering by leveraging semantic understanding to classify prompt answerability for SLMs. Built on our curated Answerable-or-Not dataset, LiteLMGuard employs ELECTRA as the candidate model with 97.75% answerability classification accuracy. The on-device deployment of LiteLMGuard enabled real-time offline filtering with over 85% defense-rate against harmful prompts (including jailbreak attacks), 94% filtering accuracy and ~135 ms average latency. These results demonstrate LiteLMGuard as a lightweight robust defense mechanism for effectively and efficiently securing on-device SLMs against Open Knowledge Attacks.

cs.CR

BitBypass: A New Direction in Jailbreaking Aligned Large Language Models with Bitstream Camouflage

The inherent risk of generating harmful and unsafe content by Large Language Models (LLMs), has highlighted the need for their safety alignment. Various techniques like supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning from human feedback, and red-teaming were developed for ensuring the safety alignment of LLMs. However, the robustness of these aligned LLMs is always challenged by adversarial attacks that exploit unexplored and underlying vulnerabilities of the safety alignment. In this paper, we develop a novel black-box jailbreak attack, called BitBypass, that leverages hyphen-separated bitstream camouflage for jailbreaking aligned LLMs. This represents a new direction in jailbreaking by exploiting fundamental information representation of data as continuous bits, rather than leveraging prompt engineering or adversarial manipulations. Our evaluation of five state-of-the-art LLMs, namely GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, Claude 3.5, Llama 3.1, and Mixtral, in adversarial perspective, revealed the capabilities of BitBypass in bypassing their safety alignment and tricking them into generating harmful and unsafe content. Further, we observed that BitBypass outperforms several state-of-the-art jailbreak attacks in terms of stealthiness and attack success. Overall, these results highlights the effectiveness and efficiency of BitBypass in jailbreaking these state-of-the-art LLMs.

cs.CR

Infrastructure Patterns in Toll Scam Domains: A Comprehensive Analysis of Cybercriminal Registration and Hosting Strategies

Toll scams involve criminals registering fake domains that pretend to be legitimate transportation agencies to trick users into making fraudulent payments. Although these scams are rapidly increasing and causing significant harm, they have not been extensively studied. We present the first large-scale analysis of toll scam domains, using a newly created dataset of 67,907 confirmed scam domains mostly registered in 2025. Our study reveals that attackers exploit permissive registrars and less common top-level domains, with 86.9% of domains concentrated in just five non-mainstream TLDs and 72.9% registered via a single provider. We also discover specific registration patterns, including short bursts of activity that suggest automated, coordinated attacks, with over half of domains registered in the first quarter of 2025. This extreme temporal clustering reflects highly synchronized campaign launches. Additionally, we build a simple predictive model using only domain registration data to predict which scam domains are likely to be suspended -- a proxy for confirmed abuse -- achieving 80.4% accuracy, and 92.3% sensitivity. Our analysis reveals attacker strategies for evading detection -- such as exploiting obscure TLDs, permissive registrars, and coordinated registration bursts -- which can inform more targeted interventions by registrars, hosting providers, and security platforms. However, our results suggest that registration metadata alone may be insufficient, and incorporating features from domain URLs and webpage content could further improve detection.

cs.CR

Robust and Verifiable MPC with Applications to Linear Machine Learning Inference

In this work, we present an efficient secure multi-party computation MPC protocol that provides strong security guarantees in settings with dishonest majority of participants who may behave arbitrarily. Unlike the popular MPC implementation known as SPDZ [Crypto '12], which only ensures security with abort, our protocol achieves both complete identifiability and robustness. With complete identifiability, honest parties can detect and unanimously agree on the identity of any malicious party. Robustness allows the protocol to continue with the computation without requiring a restart, even when malicious behavior is detected. Additionally, our approach addresses the performance limitations observed in the protocol by Cunningham et al. [ICITS '17], which, while achieving complete identifiability, is hindered by the costly exponentiation operations required by the choice of commitment scheme. Our protocol is based on the approach by Rivinius et al. [S&P '22], utilizing lattice-based commitment for better efficiency. We achieved robustness with the help of a semi-honest trusted third party. We benchmark our robust protocol, showing the efficient recovery from parties' malicious behavior. Finally, we benchmark our protocol on a ML-as-a-service scenario, wherein clients off-load the desired computation to the servers, and verify the computation result. We benchmark on linear ML inference, running on various datasets. While our efficiency is slightly lower compared to SPDZ's, we offer stronger security properties that provide distinct advantages.

cs.CR

MarkMatch: Same-Hand Stuffing Detection

We present MarkMatch, a retrieval system for detecting whether two paper ballot marks were filled by the same hand. Unlike the previous SOTA method BubbleSig, which used binary classification on isolated mark pairs, MarkMatch ranks stylistic similarity between a query mark and a mark in the database using contrastive learning. Our model is trained with a dense batch similarity matrix and a dual loss objective. Each sample is contrasted against many negatives within each batch, enabling the model to learn subtle handwriting difference and improve generalization under handwriting variation and visual noise, while diagonal supervision reinforces high confidence on true matches. The model achieves an F1 score of 0.943, surpassing BubbleSig's best performance. MarkMatch also integrates Segment Anything Model for flexible mark extraction via box- or point-based prompts. The system offers election auditors a practical tool for visual, non-biometric investigation of suspicious ballots.

cs.CV

A Machine Learning-Based Framework for Assessing Cryptographic Indistinguishability of Lightweight Block Ciphers

Indistinguishability is a fundamental principle of cryptographic security, crucial for securing data transmitted between Internet of Things (IoT) devices. This principle ensures that an attacker cannot distinguish between the encrypted data, also known as ciphertext, and random data or the ciphertexts of the two messages encrypted with the same key. This research investigates the ability of machine learning (ML) in assessing indistinguishability property in encryption systems, with a focus on lightweight ciphers. As our first case study, we consider the SPECK32/64 and SIMON32/64 lightweight block ciphers, designed for IoT devices operating under significant energy constraints. In this research, we introduce MIND-Crypt, a novel ML-based framework designed to assess the cryptographic indistinguishability of lightweight block ciphers, specifically the SPECK32/64 and SIMON32/64 encryption algorithm in CBC mode (Cipher Block Chaining), under Known Plaintext Attacks (KPA). Our approach involves training ML models using ciphertexts from two plaintext messages encrypted with same key to determine whether ML algorithms can identify meaningful cryptographic patterns or leakage. Our experiments show that modern ML techniques consistently achieve accuracy equivalent to random guessing, indicating that no statistically exploitable patterns exists in the ciphertexts generated by considered lightweight block ciphers. Furthermore, we demonstrate that in ML algorithms with all the possible combinations of the ciphertexts for given plaintext messages reflects memorization rather than generalization to unseen ciphertexts. Collectively, these findings suggest that existing block ciphers have secure cryptographic designs against ML-based indistinguishability assessments, reinforcing their security even under round-reduced conditions.

cs.CR

Is On-Device AI Broken and Exploitable? Assessing the Trust and Ethics in Small Language Models

In this paper, we present a very first study to investigate trust and ethical implications of on-device artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on small language models (SLMs) amenable for personal devices like smartphones. While on-device SLMs promise enhanced privacy, reduced latency, and improved user experience compared to cloud-based services, we posit that they might also introduce significant risks and vulnerabilities compared to their on-server counterparts. As part of our trust assessment study, we conduct a systematic evaluation of the state-of-the-art on-devices SLMs, contrasted to their on-server counterparts, based on a well-established trustworthiness measurement framework. Our results show on-device SLMs to be significantly less trustworthy, specifically demonstrating more stereotypical, unfair and privacy-breaching behavior. Informed by these findings, we then perform our ethics assessment study using a dataset of unethical questions, that depicts harmful scenarios. Our results illustrate the lacking ethical safeguards in on-device SLMs, emphasizing their capabilities of generating harmful content. Further, the broken safeguards and exploitable nature of on-device SLMs is demonstrated using potentially unethical vanilla prompts, to which the on-device SLMs answer with valid responses without any filters and without the need for any jailbreaking or prompt engineering. These responses can be abused for various harmful and unethical scenarios like: societal harm, illegal activities, hate, self-harm, exploitable phishing content and many others, all of which indicates the severe vulnerability and exploitability of these on-device SLMs.

cs.CR

The First Early Evidence of the Use of Browser Fingerprinting for Online Tracking

While advertising has become commonplace in today's online interactions, there is a notable dearth of research investigating the extent to which browser fingerprinting is harnessed for user tracking and targeted advertising. Prior studies only measured whether fingerprinting-related scripts are being run on the websites but that in itself does not necessarily mean that fingerprinting is being used for the privacy-invasive purpose of online tracking because fingerprinting might be deployed for the defensive purposes of bot/fraud detection and user authentication. It is imperative to address the mounting concerns regarding the utilization of browser fingerprinting in the realm of online advertising. This paper introduces ``FPTrace'' (fingerprinting-based tracking assessment and comprehensive evaluation framework), a framework to assess fingerprinting-based user tracking by analyzing ad changes from browser fingerprinting adjustments. Using FPTrace, we emulate user interactions, capture ad bid data, and monitor HTTP traffic. Our large-scale study reveals strong evidence of browser fingerprinting for ad tracking and targeting, shown by bid value disparities and reduced HTTP records after fingerprinting changes. We also show fingerprinting can bypass GDPR/CCPA opt-outs, enabling privacy-invasive tracking. In conclusion, our research unveils the widespread employment of browser fingerprinting in online advertising, prompting critical considerations regarding user privacy and data security within the digital advertising landscape.

cs.CR

When AI Defeats Password Deception! A Deep Learning Framework to Distinguish Passwords and Honeywords

"Honeywords" have emerged as a promising defense mechanism for detecting data breaches and foiling offline dictionary attacks (ODA) by deceiving attackers with false passwords. In this paper, we propose PassFilter, a novel deep learning (DL) based attack framework, fundamental in its ability to identify passwords from a set of sweetwords associated with a user account, effectively challenging a variety of honeywords generation techniques (HGTs). The DL model in PassFilter is trained with a set of previously collected or adversarially generated passwords and honeywords, and carefully orchestrated to predict whether a sweetword is the password or a honeyword. Our model can compromise the security of state-of-the-art, heuristics-based, and representation learning-based HGTs proposed by Dionysiou et al. Specifically, our analysis with nine publicly available password datasets shows that PassFilter significantly outperforms the baseline random guessing success rate of 5%, achieving 6.10% to 52.78% on the 1st guessing attempt, considering 20 sweetwords per account. This success rate rapidly increases with additional login attempts before account lock-outs, often allowed on many real-world online services to maintain reasonable usability. For example, it ranges from 41.78% to 96.80% for five attempts, and from 72.87% to 99.00% for ten attempts, compared to 25% and 50% random guessing, respectively. We also examined PassFilter against general-purpose language models used for honeyword generation, like those proposed by Yu et al. These honeywords also proved vulnerable to our attack, with success rates of 14.19% for 1st guessing attempt, increasing to 30.23%, 41.70%, and 63.10% after 3rd, 5th, and 10th guessing attempts, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of DL model deployed in PassFilter in breaching state-of-the-art HGTs and compromising password security based on ODA.

cs.CR

Privacy and Security of Women's Reproductive Health Apps in a Changing Legal Landscape

FemTech, a rising trend in mobile apps, empowers women to digitally manage their health and family planning. However, privacy and security vulnerabilities in period-tracking and fertility-monitoring apps present significant risks, such as unintended pregnancies and legal consequences. Our approach involves manual observations of privacy policies and app permissions, along with dynamic and static analysis using multiple evaluation frameworks. Our research reveals that many of these apps gather personally identifiable information (PII) and sensitive healthcare data. Furthermore, our analysis identifies that 61% of the code vulnerabilities found in the apps are classified under the top-ten Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) vulnerabilities. Our research emphasizes the significance of tackling the privacy and security vulnerabilities present in period-tracking and fertility-monitoring mobile apps. By highlighting these crucial risks, we aim to initiate a vital discussion and advocate for increased accountability and transparency of digital tools for women's health. We encourage the industry to prioritize user privacy and security, ultimately promoting a safer and more secure environment for women's health management.

cs.CR

VOICE-ZEUS: Impersonating Zoom's E2EE-Protected Static Media and Textual Communications via Simple Voice Manipulations

The authentication ceremony plays a crucial role in verifying the identities of users before exchanging messages in end-to-end encryption (E2EE) applications, thus preventing impersonation and man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. Once authenticated, the subsequent communications in E2EE apps benefit from the protection provided by the authentication ceremony. However, the current implementation of the authentication ceremony in the Zoom application introduces a potential vulnerability that can make it highly susceptible to impersonation attacks. The existence of this vulnerability may undermine the integrity of E2EE, posing a potential security risk when E2EE becomes a mandatory feature in the Zoom application. In this paper, we examine and evaluate this vulnerability in two attack scenarios, one where the attacker is a malicious participant and another where the attacker is a malicious Zoom server with control over Zoom's server infrastructure and cloud providers. Our study aims to comprehensively examine the Zoom authentication ceremony, with a specific focus on the potential for impersonation attacks in static media and textual communications. We simulate a new session injection attack on Zoom E2EE meetings to evaluate the system's susceptibility to simple voice manipulations. Our simulation experiments show that Zoom's authentication ceremony is vulnerable to a simple voice manipulation, called a VOICE-ZEUS attack, by malicious participants and the malicious Zoom server. In this VOICE-ZEUS attack, an attacker creates a fingerprint in a victim's voice by reordering previously recorded digits spoken by the victim. We show how an attacker can record and reorder snippets of digits to generate a new security code that compromises a future Zoom meeting. We conclude that stronger security measures are necessary during the group authentication ceremony in Zoom to prevent impersonation attacks.

cs.CR

Opted Out, Yet Tracked: Are Regulations Enough to Protect Your Privacy?

Data protection regulations, such as GDPR and CCPA, require websites and embedded third-parties, especially advertisers, to seek user consent before they can collect and process user data. Only when the users opt in, can these entities collect, process, and share user data. Websites typically incorporate Consent Management Platforms (CMPs), such as OneTrust and CookieBot, to solicit and convey user consent to the embedded advertisers, with the expectation that the consent will be respected. However, neither the websites nor the regulators currently have any mechanism to audit advertisers' compliance with the user consent, i.e., to determine if advertisers indeed do not collect, process, and share user data when the user opts out. In this paper, we propose an auditing framework that leverages advertisers' bidding behavior to empirically assess the violations of data protection regulations. Using our framework, we conduct a measurement study to evaluate four of the most widely deployed CMPs, i.e., Didomi, Quantcast, OneTrust, and CookieBot, as well as advertiser-offered opt-out controls, i.e., National Advertising Initiative's opt-out, under GDPR and CCPA. Our results indicate that in many cases user data is unfortunately still being collected, processed, and shared even when users opt-out. We also find that some CMPs are better than the others at conveying user consent and that several ad platforms ignore user consent. Our results also indicate that advertiser-offered opt-out are equally ineffective at protecting user privacy.

cs.CR

Exploring Encrypted Keyboards to Defeat Client-Side Scanning in End-to-End Encryption Systems

End-to-End Encryption (E2EE) aims to make all messages impossible to read by anyone except you and your intended recipient(s). Many well-known and widely used Instant-Messaging (IM) applications (such as Signal, WhatsApp, and Apple's iMessage) claim to provide E2EE. However, a recent technique called client-side scanning (CSS) makes these E2EE claims grandiose and hollow promises. The CSS is a technology that scans all sending and receiving messages from one end to the other. Some in industry and government now advocate this CSS technology to combat the growth of malicious child pornography, terrorism, and other illicit communication. Even though combating the spread of illegal and morally objectionable content is a laudable effort, it may open further backdoors that impact the user's privacy and security. Therefore, it is not E2EE when there are censorship mechanisms and backdoors in end-to-end encrypted applications. In this paper, we introduce an encrypted keyboard that functions as a system keyboard, enabling users to employ it across all applications on their phones when entering data. By utilizing this encrypted keyboard, users can locally encrypt and decrypt messages, effectively bypassing the CSS system. We first design and implement our encrypted keyboard as a custom keyboard application, and then we evaluate the effectiveness and security of our encrypted keyboard. Our study results show that our encrypted keyboard can successfully encrypt and decrypt all sending and receiving messages through IM applications, and therefore, it can successfully defeat the CSS technology in end-to-end encrypted systems. We also show that our encrypted keyboard can be used to add another layer of E2EE functionality on top of the existing E2EE functionality implemented by many end-to-end encrypted applications.

cs.CR

BarrierBypass: Out-of-Sight Clean Voice Command Injection Attacks through Physical Barriers

The growing adoption of voice-enabled devices (e.g., smart speakers), particularly in smart home environments, has introduced many security vulnerabilities that pose significant threats to users' privacy and safety. When multiple devices are connected to a voice assistant, an attacker can cause serious damage if they can gain control of these devices. We ask where and how can an attacker issue clean voice commands stealthily across a physical barrier, and perform the first academic measurement study of this nature on the command injection attack. We present the BarrierBypass attack that can be launched against three different barrier-based scenarios termed across-door, across-window, and across-wall. We conduct a broad set of experiments to observe the command injection attack success rates for multiple speaker samples (TTS and live human recorded) at different command audio volumes (65, 75, 85 dB), and smart speaker locations (0.1-4.0m from barrier). Against Amazon Echo Dot 2, BarrierBypass is able to achieve 100% wake word and command injection success for the across-wall and across-window attacks, and for the across-door attack (up to 2 meters). At 4 meters for the across-door attack, BarrierBypass can achieve 90% and 80% injection accuracy for the wake word and command, respectively. Against Google Home mini BarrierBypass is able to achieve 100% wake word injection accuracy for all attack scenarios. For command injection BarrierBypass can achieve 100% accuracy for all the three barrier settings (up to 2 meters). For the across-door attack at 4 meters, BarrierBypass can achieve 80% command injection accuracy. Further, our demonstration using drones yielded high command injection success, up to 100%. Overall, our results demonstrate the potentially devastating nature of this vulnerability to control a user's device from outside of the device's physical space.

cs.CR

EarSpy: Spying Caller Speech and Identity through Tiny Vibrations of Smartphone Ear Speakers

Eavesdropping from the user's smartphone is a well-known threat to the user's safety and privacy. Existing studies show that loudspeaker reverberation can inject speech into motion sensor readings, leading to speech eavesdropping. While more devastating attacks on ear speakers, which produce much smaller scale vibrations, were believed impossible to eavesdrop with zero-permission motion sensors. In this work, we revisit this important line of reach. We explore recent trends in smartphone manufacturers that include extra/powerful speakers in place of small ear speakers, and demonstrate the feasibility of using motion sensors to capture such tiny speech vibrations. We investigate the impacts of these new ear speakers on built-in motion sensors and examine the potential to elicit private speech information from the minute vibrations. Our designed system EarSpy can successfully detect word regions, time, and frequency domain features and generate a spectrogram for each word region. We train and test the extracted data using classical machine learning algorithms and convolutional neural networks. We found up to 98.66% accuracy in gender detection, 92.6% detection in speaker detection, and 56.42% detection in digit detection (which is 5X more significant than the random selection (10%)). Our result unveils the potential threat of eavesdropping on phone conversations from ear speakers using motion sensors.

cs.SD

Human Brains Can't Detect Fake News: A Neuro-Cognitive Study of Textual Disinformation Susceptibility

The spread of digital disinformation (aka "fake news") is arguably one of the most significant threats on the Internet which can cause individual and societal harm of large scales. The susceptibility to fake news attacks hinges on whether Internet users perceive a fake news article/snippet to be legitimate after reading it. In this paper, we attempt to garner an in-depth understanding of users' susceptibility to text-centric fake news attacks via a neuro-cognitive methodology. We investigate the neural underpinnings relevant to fake/real news through EEG. We run an experiment with human users to pursue a thorough investigation of users' perception and cognitive processing of fake/real news. We analyze the neural activity associated with the fake/real news detection task for different categories of news articles. Our results show there may be no statistically significant or automatically inferable differences in the way the human brain processes the fake vs. real news, while marked differences are observed when people are subject to (real/fake) news vs. resting state and even between some different categories of fake news. This neuro-cognitive finding may help to justify users' susceptibility to fake news attacks, as also confirmed from the behavioral analysis. In other words, the fake news articles may seem almost indistinguishable from the real news articles in both behavioral and neural domains. Our work serves to dissect the fundamental neural phenomena underlying fake news attacks and explains users' susceptibility to these attacks through the limits of human biology. We believe this could be a notable insight for the researchers and practitioners suggesting the human detection of fake news might be ineffective, which may also have an adverse impact on the design of automated detection approaches that crucially rely upon human labeling of text articles for building training models

cs.CL