Nithya Rajan | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Integrating spectral and morphological plant features with decision-tree models for early-season cotton biomass and nitrogen status estimation from multi-year UAV data

Precision nitrogen (N) management (PNM) for cotton requires in-season monitoring of crop growth parameters and N status indicators to decide fertilizer timing, placement, and application rates for optimal canopy development and yield. This study developed remote sensing and machine learning-based methods to estimate cotton dry biomass weight (DBW), plant N uptake (PNU), plant N concentration (PNC), critical N dilution (Nc), and nitrogen nutrition index (NNI) to support PNM. To achieve this, a three-year field-based N-management study was conducted and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral images were acquired between early vegetative growth and flowering stages, critical for fertilizer applications. Spatiotemporally consistent spectral and morphological plant features, including plant height (PH) and fractional canopy cover (FCC), provided reliable model training inputs. DBW, PNU, and PNC estimates from simple regression using vegetation indices (VIs), multiple linear regression (MLR) combining VIs, PH, and FCC, and decision-tree models, random forest regression (RFR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), combining spectral reflectance, PH, and FCC were evaluated using trial-held-out (THO) and leave-one-year-out (LOYO) validation methods. The best validation accuracies were from RFRTHO (R2 = 0.88 and MAPE = 23.14% for DBW; R2 = 0.84 and MAPE = 20.61% for PNU; R2 = 0.85 and MAPE = 7.82% for PNC) and XGBTHO (R2 = 0.87 and MAPE = 21.91% for DBW; R2 = 0.81 and MAPE = 21.40% for PNU; R2 = 0.86 and MAPE = 7.66% for PNC). Nc was calculated from model estimated DBW and PNC for high-yielding, medium-to-tall cotton varieties grown in the Texas Coastal Plains and validated using ground-truth biomass measurements. NNI derived from XGBTHO outputs performed marginally better than NNI from RFRTHO in identifying N-deficient plots and multi-level N-stress categorization.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2024

Selection of appropriate multispectral camera exposure settings and radiometric calibration methods for applications in phenotyping and precision agriculture

Radiometric accuracy of data is crucial in quantitative precision agriculture, to produce reliable and repeatable data for modeling and decision making. The effect of exposure time and gain settings on the radiometric accuracy of multispectral images was not explored enough. The goal of this study was to determine if having a fixed exposure (FE) time during image acquisition improved radiometric accuracy of images, compared to the default auto-exposure (AE) settings. This involved quantifying the errors from auto-exposure and determining ideal exposure values within which radiometric mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were minimal (< 5%). The results showed that FE orthomosaic was closer to ground-truth (higher R2 and lower MAPE) than AE orthomosaic. An ideal exposure range was determined for capturing canopy and soil objects, without loss of information from under-exposure or saturation from over-exposure. A simulation of errors from AE showed that MAPE < 5% for the blue, green, red, and NIR bands and < 7% for the red edge band for exposure settings within the determined ideal ranges and increased exponentially beyond the ideal exposure upper limit. Further, prediction of total plant nitrogen uptake (g/plant) using vegetation indices (VIs) from two different growing seasons were closer to the ground truth (mostly, R2 > 0.40, and MAPE = 12 to 14%, p < 0.05) when FE was used, compared to the prediction from AE images (mostly, R2 < 0.13, MAPE = 15 to 18%, p >= 0.05).

cs.CV↗