Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Noortje I. P. Schueler

Publications and source records attributed to Noortje I. P. Schueler.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Ultrasound Operator Guidance Using World Modeling and Retrieval Based Action Planning

Ultrasound is widely used, but acquisition quality is heavily dependent on the operator's knowledge and expertise. With demand for examinations outpacing the supply of trained sonographers, operator-guidance systems aim to close this gap by instructing a less trained user how to move the probe toward a target view. In this paper, we propose a retrieval-induced latent transition model for ultrasound acquisition dynamics, formulating ultrasound operator guidance as multi-step planning and retrieval in a world model. Using a V-JEPA 2.1 backbone, observations are first encoded into a latent space where anatomically related views lie close together. We then retrieve similar views from a reference database containing encoded latent states and corresponding probe positions and orientations. Rather than learning a parametric transition function, we directly use physically executed transitions from the database to establish our nonparametric, retrieval-induced transition model that supports receding-horizon planning. At deployment, guidance is generated from the live ultrasound image feed alone, without any probe tracking hardware. Applied to carotid ultrasound, the proposed planner reaches the target view in 86% of retrospective closed-loop episodes, versus 52% and 43% for representative baselines, outperforming both on every target view, including the challenging longitudinal internal and external carotid artery views. A prospective feasibility study on unseen volunteers, run in real time on a CPU using distillation, reaches 83% target-view reachability. Because planning is driven by proximity to any encodable goal latent, the same world model can navigate back to any previously acquired, patient-specific frame, supporting reproducible longitudinal imaging for e.g. perioperative or follow-up monitoring.

cs.LG↗

zea: A Toolbox for Cognitive Ultrasound Imaging

We present zea (pronounced ze-yah), a Python package for cognitive ultrasound imaging that offers a flexible, modular, and differentiable pipeline for ultrasound data processing. Additionally, it includes a collection of pre-defined models for ultrasound image and signal processing. The toolbox is designed to be easy to use, with a high-level interface that enables users to define custom ultrasound reconstruction pipelines and integrate deep learning models seamlessly. Built on top of Keras 3, it supports all three major deep learning backends: TensorFlow, PyTorch, and JAX, making it straightforward to incorporate custom ultrasound processing pipelines into machine learning workflows. Documentation is available at https://zea.readthedocs.io/.

eess.SP↗

Deep learning motion correction of quantitative stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Background: Quantitative stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a powerful tool for assessing myocardial ischemia. Motion correction is essential for accurate pixel-wise mapping but traditional registration-based methods are slow and sensitive to acquisition variability, limiting robustness and scalability. Methods: We developed an unsupervised deep learning-based motion correction pipeline that replaces iterative registration with efficient one-shot estimation. The method corrects motion in three steps and uses robust principal component analysis to reduce contrast-related effects. It aligns the perfusion series and auxiliary images (arterial input function and proton density-weighted series). Models were trained and validated on multivendor data from 201 patients, with 38 held out for testing. Performance was assessed via temporal alignment and quantitative perfusion values, compared to a previously published registration-based method. Results: The deep learning approach significantly improved temporal smoothness of time-intensity curves (p<0.001). Myocardial alignment (Dice = 0.92 (0.04) and 0.91 (0.05)) was comparable to the baseline and superior to before registration (Dice = 0.80 (0.09), p<0.001). Perfusion maps showed reduced motion, with lower standard deviation in the myocardium (0.52 (0.39) ml/min/g) compared to baseline (0.55 (0.44) ml/min/g). Processing time was reduced 15-fold. Conclusion: This deep learning pipeline enables fast, robust motion correction for stress perfusion CMR, improving accuracy across dynamic and auxiliary images. Trained on multivendor data, it generalizes across sequences and may facilitate broader clinical adoption of quantitative perfusion imaging.

cs.CV↗