arXiv subjects

Ofek Gila

Publications and source records attributed to Ofek Gila.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

How to Sort in a Refrigerator: Simple Entropy-Sensitive Strictly In-Place Sorting Algorithms

While modern general-purpose computing systems have ample amounts of memory, it is still the case that embedded computer systems, such as in a refrigerator, are memory limited; hence, such embedded systems motivate the need for strictly in-place algorithms, which use only O(1) additional memory besides that used for the input. In this paper, we provide the first comparison-based sorting algorithms that are strictly in-place and have a running time that is optimal in terms of the run-based entropy, H(A), of an input array, A, of size n. In particular, we describe two remarkably simple paradigms for implementing stack-based natural mergesort algorithms to be strictly in-place in O(n(1 + H(A))) time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

The Rectilinear Marco Polo Problem

We study the rectilinear Marco Polo problem, which generalizes the Euclidean version of the Marco Polo problem for performing geometric localization to rectilinear search environments, such as in geometries motivated from urban settings, and to higher dimensions. In the rectilinear Marco Polo problem, there is at least one point of interest (POI) within distance $n$, in either the $L_1$ or $L_\infty$ metric, from the origin. Motivated from a search-and-rescue application, our goal is to move a search point, $Δ$, from the origin to a location within distance $1$ of a POI. We periodically issue probes from $Δ$ out a given distance (in either the $L_1$ or $L_\infty$ metric) and if a POI is within the specified distance of $Δ$, then we learn this (but no other location information). Optimization goals are to minimize the number of probes and the distance traveled by $Δ$. We describe a number of efficient search strategies for rectilinear Marco Polo problems and we analyze each one in terms of the size, $n$, of the search domain, as defined by the maximum distance to a POI.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

Fast Geographic Routing in Fixed-Growth Graphs

In the 1960s, the social scientist Stanley Milgram performed his famous "small-world" experiments where he found that people in the US who are far apart geographically are nevertheless connected by remarkably short chains of acquaintances. Since then, there has been considerable work to design networks that accurately model the phenomenon that Milgram observed. One well-known approach was Barab{á}si and Albert's preferential attachment model, which has small diameter yet lacks an algorithm that can efficiently find those short connections between nodes. Jon Kleinberg, in contrast, proposed a small-world graph formed from an $n \times n$ lattice that guarantees that greedy routing can navigate between any two nodes in $\mathcal{O}(\log^2 n)$ time with high probability. Further work by Goodrich and Ozel and by Gila, Goodrich, and Ozel present a hybrid technique that combines elements from these previous approaches to improve greedy routing time to $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ hops. These are important theoretical results, but we believe that their reliance on the square lattice limits their application in the real world. In this work, we generalize the model of Gila, Ozel, and Goodrich to any class of what we call fixed-growth graphs of dimensionality $α$, a subset of bounded-growth graphs introduced in several prior papers. We prove tight bounds for greedy routing and diameter in these graphs, both in expectation and with high probability. We then apply our model to the U.S. road network to show that by modeling the network as a fixed-growth graph rather than as a lattice, we are able to improve greedy routing performance over all 50 states. We also show empirically that the optimal clustering exponent for the U.S. road network is much better modeled by the dimensionality of the network $α$ than by the network's size, as was conjectured in a previous work.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Zip-Tries: Simple Dynamic Data Structures for Strings

In this paper, we introduce zip-tries, which are simple, dynamic, memory-efficient data structures for strings. Zip-tries support search and update operations for $k$-length strings in $\mathcal{O}(k+\log n)$ time in the standard RAM model or in $\mathcal{O}(k/α+\log n)$ time in the word RAM model, where $α$ is the length of the longest string that can fit in a memory word, and $n$ is the number of strings in the trie. Importantly, we show how zip-tries can achieve this while only requiring $\mathcal{O}(\log{\log{n}} + \log{\log{\frac{k}α}})$ bits of metadata per node w.h.p., which is an exponential improvement over previous results for long strings. Despite being considerably simpler and more memory efficient, we show how zip-tries perform competitively with state-of-the-art data structures on large datasets of long strings. Furthermore, we provide a simple, general framework for parallelizing string comparison operations in linked data structures, which we apply to zip-tries to obtain parallel zip-tries. Parallel zip-tries are able to achieve good search and update performance in parallel, performing such operations in $\mathcal{O}(\log{n})$ span. We also apply our techniques to an existing external-memory string data structure, the string B-tree, obtaining a parallel string B-tree which performs search operations using $\mathcal{O}(\log_B{n})$ I/O span and $\mathcal{O}(\frac{k}{αB} + \log_B{n})$ I/O work in the parallel external memory (PEM) model. The parallel string B-tree can perform prefix searches using only $\mathcal{O}(\frac{\log{n}}{\log{\log{n}}})$ span under the practical PRAM model. For the case of long strings that share short common prefixes, we provide LCP-aware variants of all our algorithms that should be quite efficient in practice, which we justify empirically.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

The Marco Polo Problem: A Combinatorial Approach to Geometric Localization

We introduce and study the Marco Polo problem, which is a combinatorial approach to geometric localization. In this problem, we are told there are one or more points of interest (POIs) within distance $n$ of the origin that we wish to localize. Given a mobile search point, $Δ$, that is initially at the origin, a localization algorithm is a strategy to move $Δ$ to be within a distance of $1$ of a POI. In the combinatorial localization problem we study, the only tool we can use is reminiscent of the children's game, "Marco Polo," in that $Δ$ can issue a probe signal out a specified distance, $d$, and the search algorithm learns whether or not there is a POI within distance $d$ of $Δ$. For example, we could imagine that POIs are one or more hikers lost in a forest and we need to design a search-and-rescue (SAR) strategy to find them using radio signal probes to a response device that hikers carry. Unlike other known localization algorithms, probe responses do not inform our search algorithm of the direction or distance to a POI. The optimization problem is to minimize the number of probes and/or POI responses, as well as possibly minimizing the distance traveled by $Δ$. We describe a number of efficient combinatorial Marco Polo localization strategies and we analyze each one in terms of the size, $n$, of the search domain. Moreover, we derive strong bounds for the constant factors for the search costs for our algorithms, which in some cases involve computer-assisted proofs. We also show how to extend these strategies to find all POIs using a simple, memoryless search algorithm, traveling a distance that is $\mathcal{O}(\log{k})$-competitive with the optimal traveling salesperson (TSP) tour for $k$ POIs.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

Highway Preferential Attachment Models for Geographic Routing

In the 1960s, the world-renowned social psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted experiments that showed that not only do there exist ``short chains'' of acquaintances between any two arbitrary people, but that these arbitrary strangers are able to find these short chains. This phenomenon, known as the \emph{small-world phenomenon}, is explained in part by any model that has a low diameter, such as the Barabási and Albert's \emph{preferential attachment} model, but these models do not display the same efficient routing that Milgram's experiments showed. In the year 2000, Kleinberg proposed a model with an efficient $\mathcal{O}(\log^2{n})$ greedy routing algorithm. In 2004, Martel and Nguyen showed that Kleinberg's analysis was tight, while also showing that Kleinberg's model had an expected diameter of only $Θ(\log{n})$ -- a much smaller value than the greedy routing algorithm's path lengths. In 2022, Goodrich and Ozel proposed the \emph{neighborhood preferential attachment} model (NPA), combining elements from Barabási and Albert's model with Kleinberg's model, and experimentally showed that the resulting model outperformed Kleinberg's greedy routing performance on U.S. road networks. While they displayed impressive empirical results, they did not provide any theoretical analysis of their model. In this paper, we first provide a theoretical analysis of a generalization of Kleinberg's original model and show that it can achieve expected $\mathcal{O}(\log{n})$ routing, a much better result than Kleinberg's model. We then propose a new model, \emph{windowed NPA}, that is similar to the neighborhood preferential attachment model but has provable theoretical guarantees w.h.p. We show that this model is able to achieve $\mathcal{O}(\log^{1 + ε}{n})$ greedy routing for any $ε> 0$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Zip-zip Trees: Making Zip Trees More Balanced, Biased, Compact, or Persistent

We define simple variants of zip trees, called zip-zip trees, which provide several advantages over zip trees, including overcoming a bias that favors smaller keys over larger ones. We analyze zip-zip trees theoretically and empirically, showing, e.g., that the expected depth of a node in an $n$-node zip-zip tree is at most $1.3863\log n-1+o(1)$, which matches the expected depth of treaps and binary search trees built by uniformly random insertions. Unlike these other data structures, however, zip-zip trees achieve their bounds using only $O(\log\log n)$ bits of metadata per node, w.h.p., as compared to the $Θ(\log n)$ bits per node required by treaps. In fact, we even describe a ``just-in-time'' zip-zip tree variant, which needs just an expected $O(1)$ number of bits of metadata per node. Moreover, we can define zip-zip trees to be strongly history independent, whereas treaps are generally only weakly history independent. We also introduce \emph{biased zip-zip trees}, which have an explicit bias based on key weights, so the expected depth of a key, $k$, with weight, $w_k$, is $O(\log (W/w_k))$, where $W$ is the weight of all keys in the weighted zip-zip tree. Finally, we show that one can easily make zip-zip trees partially persistent with only $O(n)$ space overhead w.h.p.

cs.DS↗