Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Oindabi Mukherjee

Publications and source records attributed to Oindabi Mukherjee.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A Proliferated Space Architecture for Time-Domain Astrophysics

Time-Domain and Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (TDAMM) is entering a discovery-rich but follow-up-limited era, creating an urgent need for responsive, multiwavelength space-based capabilities. The Hydra constellation is a concept for a proliferated space architecture for time-domain astrophysics. The constellation would act as a disaggregated observatory composed of coordinated, relatively low-cost spacecraft that collectively provide capabilities traditionally concentrated within a single large mission. The architecture would combine persistent wide-field gamma-ray monitoring, wide-field and focused X-ray observations, and rapid-response ultraviolet, optical, and infrared imaging and spectroscopy. The constellation would both discover high-energy transients and respond to external alerts from gravitational-wave detectors, neutrino observatories, and ground- and space-based surveys, using low-latency communications, automated event prioritization, and community coordination frameworks to rapidly assign observing resources. A proliferated architecture would offer operational advantages over a single larger mission, including simultaneous observations of multiple targets, graceful degradation following individual spacecraft failures, recurring technology refresh, and opportunities for commercial, international, and philanthropic contributed nodes to join the network. The constellation would address fundamental questions concerning cosmic accelerators, the origin and evolution of the elements, the behavior of matter at extreme density, and the nature of dark energy through gravitational-wave standard sirens. This white paper presents the Hydra concept description that was submitted to NASA's ASTRA initiative for consideration by the Cosmic Origins Program Analysis Group (CoPAG) and Physics of the Cosmos Program Analysis Group (PhysPAG).

astro-ph.IM↗

Light Curve and Hardness Tests for Millilensing in GRB 950830, GRB 090717A, and GRB 200716C

To show an internal signature of gravitational lensing, two different temporal sections of a single gamma-ray burst (GRB) must be statistically similar. Here two straightforward gravitational lensing tests are defined and applied: a light-curve similarity test and a hardness similarity test. Gravitational millilensing has been claimed to be detected within several individual GRBs that contain two emission episodes separated by a time delay. However, our analyses indicate that none of those claims clearly satisfy both tests. The hardness similarity test performed on GRB 950830 and GRB 090717A found that the ratio between the second and the first emission episodes in each energy channel differed from the same ratio averaged over all detected energy channels at above the 90 percent confidence level. Also, a light curve similarity test performed on GRB 950830, GRB 090717A, and GRB 200716C separately, found that it is unlikely that the two emission episodes in each GRB were drawn from a single parent emission episode for that GRB, with differences at the 3.0 sigma, 8.3 sigma, and 8.3 sigma confidence levels respectively.

astro-ph.HE↗

Hardness Test of GRB 950830 as a Gravitationally Lensed Echo

Cumulative hardness comparisons are a simple but statistically powerful test for the presence of gravitational lensing in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Since gravitational lensing does not change photon energies, all source images should have the same spectra -- and hence hardness. Applied to the recent claim that the two pulses in GRB 950830 are lensed images of the same pulse, the measured flux ratio between the two main pulses should be the same at all energies. After summing up all the counts in both of GRB 950830's two pulses in all four BATSE energy bands, it was found that in energy channel 3, the second pulse appears somewhat weak. In comparison with the other BATSE energy channels, the difference was statistically significant at above 90\%. This model-independent test indicates that the case for GRB 950830 involving a gravitational lens may be intriguing -- but should not be considered proven.

astro-ph.HE↗