SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Olatunji Johnson

Publications and source records attributed to Olatunji Johnson.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Decoupling Distance and Networks: Hybrid Graph Attention-Geostatistical Methods for Spatio-temporal Risk Mapping

Accurate spatial prediction and rigorous uncertainty quantification are central to modern spatial epidemiology and environmental risk analysis. We introduce a statistically principled hybrid modelling framework that integrates the nonlinear, attention-based representation learning capabilities of a dynamic Graph Attention Network (GATv2) with a latent Gaussian spatial process from model-based geostatistics (MBG). This framework jointly captures relational dependence encoded in graph structures and continuous spatial dependence governed by physical proximity. We evaluate the proposed model via a controlled simulation study and an applied analysis of malaria prevalence data, comparing its predictive accuracy, calibration, and uncertainty quantification against classical geostatistical models and standalone GATv2 architectures. Our analyses show that GATv2 captures complex nonlinear interactions but fails to account for residual spatial autocorrelation, resulting in miscalibrated predictive distributions. Conversely, geostatistical models provide coherent uncertainty quantification through structured covariance functions yet are constrained by linear predictor assumptions and by their reliance on Euclidean distance to encode spatial structure. By integrating attention mechanisms and nonlinear features with an explicit probabilistic spatial random field, the hybrid model captured the relational dependence, consistently improved predictive accuracy, and provided more realistic uncertainty quantification in both simulation and applied settings. Overall, the findings demonstrate that the hybrid model constitutes a statistically coherent and empirically robust framework for modelling complex spatial and spatio-temporal processes in settings where both distance-based and structure-based dependencies operate.

stat.ME

Disentangling spatial interference and spatial confounding biases in causal inference

Spatial interference and spatial confounding are two major issues inhibiting precise causal estimates when dealing with observational spatial data. Moreover, the definition and interpretation of spatial confounding remain arguable in the literature. In this paper, our goal is to provide clarity in a novel way on misconception and issues around spatial confounding from Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) perspective and to disentangle both direct, indirect spatial confounding and spatial interference based on bias induced on causal estimates. Also, existing analyses of spatial confounding bias typically rely on Normality assumptions for treatments and confounders, assumptions that are often violated in practice. Relaxing these assumptions, we derive analytical expressions for spatial confounding bias under more general distributional settings using Poisson as example . We showed that the choice of spatial weights, the distribution of the treatment, and the magnitude of interference critically determine the extent of bias due to spatial interference. We further demonstrate that direct and indirect spatial confounding can be disentangled, with both the weight matrix and the nature of exposure playing central roles in determining the magnitude of indirect bias. Theoretical results are supported by simulation studies and an application to real-world spatial data. In future, parametric frameworks for concomitantly adjusting for spatial interference, direct and indirect spatial confounding for both direct and mediated effects estimation will be developed.

stat.ME

Accounting for Multiple Covariates in Non-Stationary Geostatistical Modelling

Model-based geostatistics (MBG) is a subfield of spatial statistics focused on predicting spatially continuous phenomena using data collected at discrete locations. Geostatistical models often rely on the assumptions of stationarity and isotropy for practical and conceptual simplicity. However, an alternative perspective involves considering non-stationarity, where statistical characteristics vary across the study area. While previous work has explored non-stationary processes, particularly those leveraging covariate information to address non-stationarity, this research expands upon these concepts by incorporating multiple covariates and proposing different ways for constructing non-stationary processes. Through a simulation study, the significance of selecting the appropriate non-stationary process is demonstrated. The proposed approach is then applied to analyse malaria prevalence data in Mozambique, showcasing its practical utility

stat.ME

A Spatially Discrete Approximation to Log-Gaussian Cox Processes for Modelling Aggregated Disease Count Data

In this paper, we develop a computationally efficient discrete approximation to log-Gaussian Cox process (LGCP) models for the analysis of spatially aggregated disease count data. Our approach overcomes an inherent limitation of spatial models based on Markov structures, namely that each such model is tied to a specific partition of the study area, and allows for spatially continuous prediction. We compare the predictive performance of our modelling approach with LGCP through a simulation study and an application to primary biliary cirrhosis incidence data in Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK. Our results suggest that when disease risk is assumed to be a spatially continuous process, the proposed approximation to LGCP provides reliable estimates of disease risk both on spatially continuous and aggregated scales. The proposed methodology is implemented in the open-source R package SDALGCP.

stat.ME