SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Oscar Godoy

Publications and source records attributed to Oscar Godoy.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Anthropogenic disturbance expands the climatic limits of annual plant dominance

Disturbance regimes and nutrient inputs are changing worldwide, with consequences for the structure and functioning of plant communities. Classical life-history theory predicts that disturbance should shift communities from long-lived perennials toward short-lived annuals, and that nutrient enrichment may amplify this shift. However, these predictions have not been tested experimentally across broad environmental gradients. Here, using a global coordinated grassland experiment spanning 37 sites, we tested how physical disturbance, vegetation removal and shallow soil tillage, and fertilisation reshape annual-perennial balance, and whether disturbance relaxes the climatic limits of annual dominance. Disturbance nearly doubled the proportion of annual species and more than doubled the relative cover of annuals, whereas fertilisation had little influence and did not interact with disturbance. The disturbance-driven shift arose through contrasting pathways: in graminoids and legumes, it reflected the loss of perennial cover, while in forbs, the expansion of annual cover. In the absence of disturbance, annual dominance was restricted to systems with extremely hot and dry summers, but disturbance nearly tripled the extent of climate space in which annuals dominated. By rapidly reassembling after disturbance, annuals may help maintain vegetation cover, but their expansion also signals loss of perennial cover and the long-term ecosystem functions associated with it.

q-bio.OT

The storage effect is not about bet-hedging or population stage-structure

The storage effect is a well-known explanation for coexistence in temporally varying environments. Like many complex ecological theories, the storage effect is often used as an explanation for observed coexistence on the basis of heuristic understanding, rather than careful application of a detailed model. One interpretation states that species coexist by specializing on specific environmental states, and therefore must have a robust life-stage (e.g., long-lived adults, a seed-bank) in order to "wait it out" for favorable conditions. Here we show that this widely employed interpretation can be misleading. Multiple models show that stage-structure, long lifespans, and overlapping generations are neither necessary nor sufficient for the storage effect. In models where a robust life-stage does engender a storage effect, it does not do so by preventing stochastic extinction or by improving relative bet-hedging. A robust life-stage is best understood as one of many ways to fulfill an abstract condition for the storage effect: an interaction effect of environment and competition on per capita growth rates. Using a dataset of annual plants from a Mediterranean grassland in Spain, we show that such interaction effects occur between water availability and the number of germinant competitors, leading to storage in the absence of a persistent seed bank. Empiricists hoping to uncover the storage effect should look for interaction effects between environmental conditions and competition -- easily identifiable with multiple regression -- at all stages of a species' life-cycle.

q-bio.PE