SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Oskar Hansson

Publications and source records attributed to Oskar Hansson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Converting T1-weighted MRI from 3T to 7T quality using deep learning

Ultra-high resolution 7 tesla (7T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides detailed anatomical views, offering better signal-to-noise ratio, resolution and tissue contrast than 3T MRI, though at the cost of accessibility. We present an advanced deep learning model for synthesizing 7T brain MRI from 3T brain MRI. Paired 7T and 3T T1-weighted images were acquired from 172 participants (124 cognitively unimpaired, 48 impaired) from the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study. To synthesize 7T MRI from 3T images, we trained two models: a specialized U-Net, and a U-Net integrated with a generative adversarial network (GAN U-Net). Our models outperformed two previous state-of-the-art 3T-to-7T models in image-based evaluation metrics. Four blinded MRI professionals judged our synthetic 7T images as comparable in detail to real 7T images, and superior in subjective visual quality to 7T images, due to the reduction of artifacts. Using both SynthSeg and NextBrain, automated segmentations of the synthetic 7T images were more similar to real 7T segmentations than automated segmentations from the 3T images that were used to synthesize the 7T images. Finally, synthetic 7T images showed similar performance to real 3T images in downstream prediction of cognitive status using MRI derivatives (n=3,168). In all, we show that synthetic T1-weighted brain images approaching 7T quality can be generated from 3T images, which may improve image quality and segmentation, without compromising performance in downstream tasks. Future directions, possible clinical use cases, and limitations are discussed.

eess.IV

Searching for the neurite density with diffusion MRI: challenges for biophysical modeling

In vivo mapping of the neurite density with diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a high but challenging aim. First, it is unknown whether all neurites exhibit completely anisotropic ('stick-like') diffusion. Second, the 'density' of tissue components may be confounded by non-diffusion properties such as T2 relaxation. Third, the domain of validity for the estimated parameters to serve as indices of neurite density is incompletely explored. We investigated these challenges by acquiring data with 'b-tensor encoding' and multiple echo times in both healthy brain and white matter lesions. Results showed that microscopic anisotropy from b-tensor data is associated with myelinated axons but not with dendrites. Furthermore, b-tensor and multi-echo data showed that unbiased density estimates in white matter lesions require data-driven estimates of compartment-specific T2 times. Finally, the 'stick' fractions of different biophysical models could generally not serve as neurite density indices across the healthy brain and white matter lesions, where outcomes of comparisons depended on the choice of constraints. In particular, constraining compartment-specific T2 times was ambiguous in the healthy brain and had a large impact on estimated values. In summary, estimating neurite density may require accounting for different diffusion and/or T2 properties between axons and dendrites. Constrained 'index' parameters could be valid within limited domains that should be delineated by future studies.

physics.med-ph