arXiv subjects

Ossi Räisä

Publications and source records attributed to Ossi Räisä.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Efficient Provably Private Classification with a Tabular Foundation Model

Tabular data underpin prediction and decision-making in medicine, finance, government and science, but often contain sensitive individual-level information, creating a need for accurate prediction while preserving privacy. Traditional private learning provides formal privacy guarantees, but requires slow dataset-specific optimisation, suffers substantial utility loss under strong privacy, and is often difficult to apply correctly. Tabular foundation models adapt rapidly to new datasets, but existing models lack formal privacy guarantees, and are highly vulnerable to membership-inference attacks, limiting their use on sensitive data. Here we introduce PrivTab, an easy to use tabular foundation model for differentially private classification that embeds a privacy mechanism within its architecture. Pretrained on simulated datasets, PrivTab uses in-context learning to transform sensitive rows into compact, provably private summaries---effectively learning how to learn under privacy. PrivTab outperforms private linear and neural-network baselines under moderate-to-strong privacy, shows negligible membership leakage, maintains well-calibrated predictions under strong privacy, and reduces dataset fitting time by 10,000 times, requiring only a single forward pass. By combining formal privacy, speed, and easy of use, PrivTab brings recent advances in AI to applications where sensitive individual-level data have limited their adoption.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

On Reliability of Membership Inference Vulnerability Evaluation

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are popular methods for empirically assessing the leakage of sensitive information in the training data through models or statistics learned from the data. The MI vulnerability is often evaluated through a binary classifier that tries to predict whether a particular sample was in the training data. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of MIAs multiple \textit{shadow models} are trained using random partitions of a larger dataset. After training the shadow models the MI vulnerability can be evaluated for all the samples for which we obtained shadow models. In order to evaluate the MI vulnerability reliably one needs a lot of shadow models which can be computationally infeasible. Therefore instead of reporting the actual sample level vulnerabilities aggregates over multiple samples are often reported in practice. We demonstrate two key weaknesses in typical MIA evaluation pipeline. First, we show that sampling the shadow datasets from a fixed superset leads to finite sample bias inflating the vulnerability estimates. Second, we show that evaluating the true positive rate (TPR) by concatenating MIA scores across multiple individuals, commonly used in the very low false positive rate (FPR) regime, is not calibrated across the per-sample FPRs. For both weaknesses we propose fixes that in the most simple approximate form do not incur any additional computation cost. We show that with additional computation one can further improve the reliability of the vulnerability estimation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Accuracy-First Rényi Differential Privacy and Post-Processing Immunity

The accuracy-first perspective of differential privacy addresses an important shortcoming by allowing a data analyst to adaptively adjust the quantitative privacy bound instead of sticking to a predetermined bound. Existing works on the accuracy-first perspective have neglected an important property of differential privacy known as post-processing immunity, which ensures that an adversary is not able to weaken the privacy guarantee by post-processing. We address this gap by determining which existing definitions in the accuracy-first perspective have post-processing immunity, and which do not. The only definition with post-processing immunity, pure ex-post privacy, lacks useful tools for practical problems, such as an ex-post analogue of the Gaussian mechanism, and an algorithm to check if accuracy on separate private validation set is high enough. To address this, we propose a new definition based on Rényi differential privacy that has post-processing immunity, and we develop basic theory and tools needed for practical applications. We demonstrate the practicality of our theory with applications to synthetic data generation and image classifier fine-tuning, where our algorithm successfully adjusts the privacy bound until an accuracy threshold is met on a private validation dataset.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

$f$-Differential Privacy Filters: Validity and Approximate Solutions

Accounting for privacy loss under fully adaptive composition -- where mechanism choice and privacy parameters may depend on the history of prior outputs -- is a central challenge in differential privacy (DP). Here, privacy filters are stopping rules ensuring a prescribed global budget is not exceeded. A leading candidate for optimal filter design is $f$-DP, which characterizes the full extent of adversarial hypothesis testing and recovers $(\varepsilon,δ)$-DP through piece-wise linear trade-off functions, while enabling tight $(\varepsilon,δ)$-DP accounting in standard compositions via tensor products. Yet whether such filters can be correctly defined under $f$-DP remains unclear. We show that the natural $f$-DP filter -- tracking path-wise accumulating tensor products and stopping when the prescribed curve is crossed -- is fundamentally invalid, precluding the direct use of standard efficient numerical Fast-Fourier-Transform accounting in the fully adaptive setting. We characterize this failure, establishing necessary and sufficient conditions for the natural filter's validity. Furthermore, we prove a fully adaptive central limit theorem for $f$-DP, establishing Gaussian convergence of cumulative privacy losses under full adaptivity. As a demonstration, we construct a closed-form approximate GDP filter for subsampled Gaussian mechanisms that provably outperforms RDP-based accounting in asymptotic regimes ($q\ll 1$ and $q\approx 1$) without tracking the full trade-off function, demonstrating that the slack in RDP is not intrinsic to adaptive composition -- though CLT-based approximations are known to be optimistic at realistic subsampling rates, a limitation that remains an open challenge.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Position: All Current Generative Fidelity and Diversity Metrics are Flawed

Any method's development and practical application is limited by our ability to measure its reliability. The popularity of generative modeling emphasizes the importance of good synthetic data metrics. Unfortunately, previous works have found many failure cases in current metrics, for example lack of outlier robustness and unclear lower and upper bounds. We propose a list of desiderata for synthetic data metrics, and a suite of sanity checks: carefully chosen simple experiments that aim to detect specific and known generative modeling failure modes. Based on these desiderata and the results of our checks, we arrive at our position: all current generative fidelity and diversity metrics are flawed. This significantly hinders practical use of synthetic data. Our aim is to convince the research community to spend more effort in developing metrics, instead of models. Additionally, through analyzing how current metrics fail, we provide practitioners with guidelines on how these metrics should (not) be used.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning

Many high-stakes applications require machine learning models that protect user privacy and provide well-calibrated, accurate predictions. While Differential Privacy (DP) is the gold standard for protecting user privacy, standard DP mechanisms typically significantly impair performance. One approach to mitigating this issue is pre-training models on simulated data before DP learning on the private data. In this work we go a step further, using simulated data to train a meta-learning model that combines the Convolutional Conditional Neural Process (ConvCNP) with an improved functional DP mechanism of Hall et al. [2013] yielding the DPConvCNP. DPConvCNP learns from simulated data how to map private data to a DP predictive model in one forward pass, and then provides accurate, well-calibrated predictions. We compare DPConvCNP with a DP Gaussian Process (GP) baseline with carefully tuned hyperparameters. The DPConvCNP outperforms the GP baseline, especially on non-Gaussian data, yet is much faster at test time and requires less tuning.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

A Bias-Variance Decomposition for Ensembles over Multiple Synthetic Datasets

Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of generating multiple synthetic datasets for supervised learning, from increased accuracy to more effective model selection and uncertainty estimation. These benefits have clear empirical support, but the theoretical understanding of them is currently very light. We seek to increase the theoretical understanding by deriving bias-variance decompositions for several settings of using multiple synthetic datasets, including differentially private synthetic data. Our theory yields a simple rule of thumb to select the appropriate number of synthetic datasets in the case of mean-squared error and Brier score. We investigate how our theory works in practice with several real datasets, downstream predictors and error metrics. As our theory predicts, multiple synthetic datasets often improve accuracy, while a single large synthetic dataset gives at best minimal improvement, showing that our insights are practically relevant.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Subsampling is not Magic: Why Large Batch Sizes Work for Differentially Private Stochastic Optimisation

We study how the batch size affects the total gradient variance in differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD), seeking a theoretical explanation for the usefulness of large batch sizes. As DP-SGD is the basis of modern DP deep learning, its properties have been widely studied, and recent works have empirically found large batch sizes to be beneficial. However, theoretical explanations of this benefit are currently heuristic at best. We first observe that the total gradient variance in DP-SGD can be decomposed into subsampling-induced and noise-induced variances. We then prove that in the limit of an infinite number of iterations, the effective noise-induced variance is invariant to the batch size. The remaining subsampling-induced variance decreases with larger batch sizes, so large batches reduce the effective total gradient variance. We confirm numerically that the asymptotic regime is relevant in practical settings when the batch size is not small, and find that outside the asymptotic regime, the total gradient variance decreases even more with large batch sizes. We also find a sufficient condition that implies that large batch sizes similarly reduce effective DP noise variance for one iteration of DP-SGD.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2023

On Consistent Bayesian Inference from Synthetic Data

Generating synthetic data, with or without differential privacy, has attracted significant attention as a potential solution to the dilemma between making data easily available, and the privacy of data subjects. Several works have shown that consistency of downstream analyses from synthetic data, including accurate uncertainty estimation, requires accounting for the synthetic data generation. There are very few methods of doing so, most of them for frequentist analysis. In this paper, we study how to perform consistent Bayesian inference from synthetic data. We prove that mixing posterior samples obtained separately from multiple large synthetic data sets converges to the posterior of the downstream analysis under standard regularity conditions when the analyst's model is compatible with the data provider's model. We also present several examples showing how the theory works in practice, and showing how Bayesian inference can fail when the compatibility assumption is not met, or the synthetic data set is not significantly larger than the original.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Noise-Aware Statistical Inference with Differentially Private Synthetic Data

While generation of synthetic data under differential privacy (DP) has received a lot of attention in the data privacy community, analysis of synthetic data has received much less. Existing work has shown that simply analysing DP synthetic data as if it were real does not produce valid inferences of population-level quantities. For example, confidence intervals become too narrow, which we demonstrate with a simple experiment. We tackle this problem by combining synthetic data analysis techniques from the field of multiple imputation (MI), and synthetic data generation using noise-aware (NA) Bayesian modeling into a pipeline NA+MI that allows computing accurate uncertainty estimates for population-level quantities from DP synthetic data. To implement NA+MI for discrete data generation using the values of marginal queries, we develop a novel noise-aware synthetic data generation algorithm NAPSU-MQ using the principle of maximum entropy. Our experiments demonstrate that the pipeline is able to produce accurate confidence intervals from DP synthetic data. The intervals become wider with tighter privacy to accurately capture the additional uncertainty stemming from DP noise.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2021

Differentially Private Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms have long been the main workhorses of Bayesian inference. Among them, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) has recently become very popular due to its efficiency resulting from effective use of the gradients of the target distribution. In privacy-preserving machine learning, differential privacy (DP) has become the gold standard in ensuring that the privacy of data subjects is not violated. Existing DP MCMC algorithms either use random-walk proposals, or do not use the Metropolis--Hastings (MH) acceptance test to ensure convergence without decreasing their step size to zero. We present a DP variant of HMC using the MH acceptance test that builds on a recently proposed DP MCMC algorithm called the penalty algorithm, and adds noise to the gradient evaluations of HMC. We prove that the resulting algorithm converges to the correct distribution, and is ergodic. We compare DP-HMC with the existing penalty, DP-SGLD and DP-SGNHT algorithms, and find that DP-HMC has better or equal performance than the penalty algorithm, and performs more consistently than DP-SGLD or DP-SGNHT.

stat.CO↗