arXiv subjects

Owen Thomas

Publications and source records attributed to Owen Thomas.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Inverse Probability Weighting in a Post-Bayesian World

We present a justification of the use of Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) in a post-Bayesian framework, in which the bias-correction provided by IPW in a frequentist context is reframed as a reweighting of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the statistical model and the true data-generating parameter value. We provide a coherent argument in support of this approach, including theoretical results concerning convergence and properties of the generalised belief posteriors. We present examples demonstrating the utility of post-Bayesian IPW in practice: these include two simulated examples of inference under selection bias in the observed data, and a large-scale real-data example concerning systematic biases present in registry data when using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to predict prostate cancer mortality. The empirical and theoretical results together show the utility of IPW to address classes of problems previously intractable within a Bayesian approach.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Heterogeneous Clinical Trial Outcomes via Multi-Output Gaussian Processes

We make use of Kronecker structure for scaling Gaussian Process models to large-scale, heterogeneous, clinical data sets. Repeated measures, commonly performed in clinical research, facilitate computational acceleration for nonlinear Bayesian nonparametric models and enable exact sampling for non-conjugate inference, when combinations of continuous and discrete endpoints are observed. Model inference is performed in Stan, and comparisons are made with brms on simulated data and two real clinical data sets, following a radiological image quality theme. Scalable Gaussian Process models compare favourably with parametric models on real data sets with 17,460 observations. Different GP model specifications are explored, with components analogous to random effects, and their theoretical properties are described.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Prior knowledge elicitation: The past, present, and future

Specification of the prior distribution for a Bayesian model is a central part of the Bayesian workflow for data analysis, but it is often difficult even for statistical experts. In principle, prior elicitation transforms domain knowledge of various kinds into well-defined prior distributions, and offers a solution to the prior specification problem. In practice, however, we are still fairly far from having usable prior elicitation tools that could significantly influence the way we build probabilistic models in academia and industry. We lack elicitation methods that integrate well into the Bayesian workflow and perform elicitation efficiently in terms of costs of time and effort. We even lack a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding different facets of the prior elicitation problem. Why are we not widely using prior elicitation? We analyse the state of the art by identifying a range of key aspects of prior knowledge elicitation, from properties of the modelling task and the nature of the priors to the form of interaction with the expert. The existing prior elicitation literature is reviewed and categorized in these terms. This allows recognizing under-studied directions in prior elicitation research, finally leading to a proposal of several new avenues to improve prior elicitation methodology.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Likelihood-free inference by ratio estimation

We consider the problem of parametric statistical inference when likelihood computations are prohibitively expensive but sampling from the model is possible. Several so-called likelihood-free methods have been developed to perform inference in the absence of a likelihood function. The popular synthetic likelihood approach infers the parameters by modelling summary statistics of the data by a Gaussian probability distribution. In another popular approach called approximate Bayesian computation, the inference is performed by identifying parameter values for which the summary statistics of the simulated data are close to those of the observed data. Synthetic likelihood is easier to use as no measure of `closeness' is required but the Gaussianity assumption is often limiting. Moreover, both approaches require judiciously chosen summary statistics. We here present an alternative inference approach that is as easy to use as synthetic likelihood but not as restricted in its assumptions, and that, in a natural way, enables automatic selection of relevant summary statistic from a large set of candidates. The basic idea is to frame the problem of estimating the posterior as a problem of estimating the ratio between the data generating distribution and the marginal distribution. This problem can be solved by logistic regression, and including regularising penalty terms enables automatic selection of the summary statistics relevant to the inference task. We illustrate the general theory on canonical examples and employ it to perform inference for challenging stochastic nonlinear dynamical systems and high-dimensional summary statistics.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2020

Generalised Bayes Updates with $f$-divergences through Probabilistic Classifiers

A stream of algorithmic advances has steadily increased the popularity of the Bayesian approach as an inference paradigm, both from the theoretical and applied perspective. Even with apparent successes in numerous application fields, a rising concern is the robustness of Bayesian inference in the presence of model misspecification, which may lead to undesirable extreme behavior of the posterior distributions for large sample sizes. Generalized belief updating with a loss function represents a central principle to making Bayesian inference more robust and less vulnerable to deviations from the assumed model. Here we consider such updates with $f$-divergences to quantify a discrepancy between the assumed statistical model and the probability distribution which generated the observed data. Since the latter is generally unknown, estimation of the divergence may be viewed as an intractable problem. We show that the divergence becomes accessible through the use of probabilistic classifiers that can leverage an estimate of the ratio of two probability distributions even when one or both of them is unknown. We demonstrate the behavior of generalized belief updates for various specific choices under the $f$-divergence family. We show that for specific divergence functions such an approach can even improve on methods evaluating the correct model likelihood function analytically.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Probabilistic elicitation of expert knowledge through assessment of computer simulations

We present a new method for probabilistic elicitation of expert knowledge using binary responses of human experts assessing simulated data from a statistical model, where the parameters are subject to uncertainty. The binary responses describe either the absolute realism of individual simulations or the relative realism of a pair of simulations in the two alternative versions of out approach. Each version provides a nonparametric representation of the expert belief distribution over the values of a model parameter, without demanding the assertion of any opinion on the parameter values themselves. Our framework also integrates the use of active learning to efficiently query the experts, with the possibility to additionally provide a useful misspecification diagnostic. We validate both methods on an automatic expert judging a binomial distribution, and on human experts judging the distribution of voters across political parties in the United States and Norway. Both methods provide flexible and meaningful representations of the human experts' beliefs, correctly identifying the higher dispersion of voters between parties in Norway.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Misspecification-robust likelihood-free inference in high dimensions

Likelihood-free inference for simulator-based statistical models has developed rapidly from its infancy to a useful tool for practitioners. However, models with more than a handful of parameters still generally remain a challenge for the Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) based inference. To advance the possibilities for performing likelihood-free inference in higher dimensional parameter spaces, we introduce an extension of the popular Bayesian optimisation based approach to approximate discrepancy functions in a probabilistic manner which lends itself to an efficient exploration of the parameter space. Our approach achieves computational scalability for higher dimensional parameter spaces by using separate acquisition functions and discrepancies for each parameter. The efficient additive acquisition structure is combined with exponentiated loss -likelihood to provide a misspecification-robust characterisation of the marginal posterior distribution for all model parameters. The method successfully performs computationally efficient inference in a 100-dimensional space on canonical examples and compares favourably to existing modularised ABC methods. We further illustrate the potential of this approach by fitting a bacterial transmission dynamics model to a real data set, which provides biologically coherent results on strain competition in a 30-dimensional parameter space.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2019

Diagnosing model misspecification and performing generalized Bayes' updates via probabilistic classifiers

Model misspecification is a long-standing enigma of the Bayesian inference framework as posteriors tend to get overly concentrated on ill-informed parameter values towards the large sample limit. Tempering of the likelihood has been established as a safer way to do updates from prior to posterior in the presence of model misspecification. At one extreme tempering can ignore the data altogether and at the other extreme it provides the standard Bayes' update when no misspecification is assumed to be present. However, it is an open issue how to best recognize misspecification and choose a suitable level of tempering without access to the true generating model. Here we show how probabilistic classifiers can be employed to resolve this issue. By training a probabilistic classifier to discriminate between simulated and observed data provides an estimate of the ratio between the model likelihood and the likelihood of the data under the unobserved true generative process, within the discriminatory abilities of the classifier. The expectation of the logarithm of a ratio with respect to the data generating process gives an estimation of the negative Kullback-Leibler divergence between the statistical generative model and the true generative distribution. Using a set of canonical examples we show that this divergence provides a useful misspecification diagnostic, a model comparison tool, and a method to inform a generalised Bayesian update in the presence of misspecification for likelihood-based models.

stat.ME↗