Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Panhapin Theang

Publications and source records attributed to Panhapin Theang.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PalmLeaf-VQA: A Multi-Script Visual Question Answering Benchmark for Historical Palm-Leaf Manuscript Understanding Across Diverse Regions

Historical manuscripts remain largely absent from modern vision-language benchmarks, leaving open how well multimodal large language models (MLLMs) handle culturally diverse, degraded, and non-Latin document images. We introduce \textbf{PalmLeaf-VQA}, a multi-script visual question answering benchmark for historical palm-leaf manuscript understanding across South and Southeast Asian traditions. PalmLeaf-VQA contains \textbf{923 curated manuscript images} and \textbf{7,384 question--answer pairs} from eight collection groups: Balinese, Grantha, Jathakam, Kambaramayanam, Kannada, Khmer, Sundanese, and Tamil. Unlike recognition-oriented resources, the benchmark targets manuscript-aware visual reasoning over preservation-relevant cues, including physical condition, line structure, material and coating, binding holes, margins, symbols, drawings, and localized visual artifacts. We evaluate recent proprietary and open-weight MLLMs under open-answer and constrained-answer prompting and provide fine-grained analysis across collections, question categories, and task types. The strongest evaluated model reaches only \textbf{58.00\% exact-match accuracy} on the held-out test split, revealing substantial limitations in current MLLMs for rare-script, degraded-layout, and preservation-oriented document understanding. PalmLeaf-VQA provides a standardized benchmark for advancing culturally grounded and layout-aware multimodal document analysis.

cs.CV↗

Do MLLMs Really Understand Low-Resource Khmer Documents? A Pilot Study on Khmer Document VQA

Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced document understanding, visual question answering, and text extraction. However, their reliability in low-resource, non-Latin settings remains uncertain. Khmer form documents present particular challenges because they contain complex script forms, mixed Khmer-English fields, and monetary values in both Cambodian Riel and US Dollars. Available resources for Khmer Document VQA are also limited. This paper presents a pilot diagnostic evaluation of open MLLMs on Khmer document images. We construct an evaluation subset from the previously introduced KH-FUNSD collection, covering invoices, receipts, quotations, and other business forms. The subset includes questions in English and Khmer, with answers retained in their original English, Khmer, mixed-script, or numeric forms. Rather than introducing a full public benchmark, this study examines the capabilities and failure modes of existing models. We evaluate representative open Qwen-VL models using direct image-based prompting and compare parser-assisted and external OCR-assisted configurations with Qwen3-VL-8B. Direct Qwen3-VL-8B outperforms smaller models, achieving 51.9% overall accuracy, although performance remains limited for Khmer-script and mixed-script answers. External OCR produces the strongest results, reaching 61.9% with Tesseract and 61.6% with PaddleOCR. Nevertheless, Khmer-script answers remain substantially more difficult than English and numeric fields. The results indicate that current MLLMs can process visually clear English and structured numeric content, but reliable native Khmer document understanding remains an open challenge.

cs.CL↗