Comparing Controller Synthesis Methods with Deadline-Miss Awareness
This paper presents a comparative study of real-time controller design methods for dynamical control systems subject to deadline overruns. Numerous techniques have been proposed to handle missed deadlines, i.e., including models or information of possible deadline misses directly in the control design. These approaches substantially differ in their assumptions, supported execution semantics, required runtime information, and provided guarantees, making direct comparison challenging. We address this gap with a qualitative assessment of representative deadline-miss-aware control methods. We analyze the design space of such controllers and identify the critical assumptions on the real-time constraints, the control design criteria and implementation aspects. We expose how these different assumptions lead to the different trade-offs in applicability, and control performance and guarantees. We contribute a comparison tool enabling researchers to systematically benchmark new techniques against the state of the art. The study is supported by simulations on two case studies: a Furuta pendulum and an electric motor to illustrate the practical behavior of the different approaches under missed-deadline conditions.