Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Paris Avgeriou

Publications and source records attributed to Paris Avgeriou.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Energy Efficiency in Microservice Architectures: A Systematic Literature Review

Context. Microservice architectures are widely adopted for building scalable cloud-native systems, enabling independent deployment, fine-grained service composition, and operational elasticity. Problem. Despite growing interest in sustainable software, research on energy efficiency in microservices spans operational, infrastructural, and architectural perspectives, but these are typically addressed in isolation. Existing studies focus on optimisation techniques or measurement approaches, with limited synthesis of how energy efficiency is considered, measured, and addressed at the architectural level. Goal. This study synthesises research on energy-efficient microservices by examining where energy efficiency is considered, how it is measured, and which architectural solutions have been proposed. Method. We conduct a systematic literature review following Kitchenham's guidelines, screening publications from four major digital libraries through a six-stage process with backward and forward snowballing, resulting in 40 primary studies. Results. Energy efficiency is predominantly addressed at runtime through monitoring, scheduling, and resource management, while design-time integration remains limited. Measurement practices are largely infrastructure-oriented and rely on model-based estimation and coarse-grained monitoring. Conclusion. Energy efficiency in microservices is primarily treated as an operational optimisation problem rather than a lifecycle-spanning architectural concern, highlighting the need for earlier architectural integration and improved measurement practices.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

What Characterizes Pairwise Modular Smells?

Enhancing the modular structure of existing systems has attracted substantial research interest, primarily through (1) software modularization and (2) identifying design issues (e.g., smells) as refactoring opportunities; however, both approaches often prove impractical to guide effective improvement. Inspired by both aforementioned approaches, our previous study introduced a novel and practical architectural smell -- called Pairwise Modular Smell (or PairSmell) -- for identifying flawed architectural decisions that necessitate further examination. The objective of this study is to explain PairSmell from the perspective of pair characteristics. To this end, we first conduct a rapid review to collect and synthesize 19 pair characteristics that have been used in the literature to represent relationships between two entities. The collected characteristics are then used to train machine learning models for predicting two forms of PairSmell -- inapt separated pairs InSep and inapt collocated pairs InCol, based on a curated dataset of over 6,135,000 pairs of entities derived from 11 open-source Java projects. The trained models achieve up to a 58.6% improvement in ROC-AUC over the baselines. The interpretation of the models reveals that the most influential features for InSep are out-going dependencies, terms shared with others, and declared fields; while those for InCol include semantic similarity based on tf-idf, terms shared between the pair, terms shared with others, and in-going dependencies. We complement the work with a series of practical examples to illustrate how the influential pair characteristics impact the occurrence of PairSmell.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

TagDebt: A Bot to Support Technical Debt Management

Context: Technical debt (TD) is a widely studied metaphor that helps to explain how sub-optimal decisions that can harm software maintainability over time. Although incurring TD is not intrinsically bad, tracking and managing TD are crucial to avoid its negative effects. Hence, researchers and practitioners have proposed and developed diverse approaches and tools for managing TD. However, we are still lacking specialized tools for technical debt management (TDM), specifically ones that can be easily integrated into existing development workflows. Objective: We present and evaluate TagDebt, a bot that can be integrated within GitHub repositories and automatically assign labels to issues (i.e., SATD or non-SATD). TagDebt helps in the identification of TD (i.e., by looking for self-admitted technical debt (SATD)), leading to more efficient TDM. Methods: We carried out a Design Science Research study to design and implement TagDebt. For its evaluation, we executed a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) study through interviews with 16 practitioners, to check the bot's usefulness, ease of use, and contextual factors that might impact the bot's usage (such as team size and practitioners' roles). Results: Overall, practitioners found that TagDebt is useful, especially for organizing issues and reducing manual work. Furthermore, they pointed out that the bot is overall easy to use, and its documentation is clear. The analysis also revealed that contextual factors, such as team and codebase size, impact the decision to adopt TagDebt. Finally, several improvements were suggested, such as including features to check and update the source code. Conclusion: TagDebt is a proof-of-concept for the development and usage of more specialized tools for TDM. It helps to make TD visible without disrupting existing workflows and help practitioners avoid the risks of unmanaged TD.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

The Dangers of Non-Self-Fixed Architecture Technical Debt and Its Impact on Time-to-Fix

Technical Debt (TD) refers to the long-term costs incurred when developers prioritize short-term delivery over quality-improving work. Architectural Technical Debt (ATD) arises when architectural decisions (e.g., technology choices, patterns, or decomposition) prioritize near-term progress over future maintainability and evolvability. Because ATD affects a system's core structure and propagates through architectural dependencies, it is often more expensive and disruptive to remediate than localized code-level debt. Although ATD has been widely studied, an important but underexplored aspect of repayment is who performs it. Prior work provides limited empirical evidence on repayment responsibility in ATD and its relationship to time-to-fix. We empirically study self-fixed ATD, where the introducer also repays the debt, and contrast it with non-self-fixed ATD in large Apache open-source projects. We reconstruct ATD lifecycles by tracing Jira artifacts to version-control history to identify introduction and repayment points and attribute developer roles. We address three research questions on the prevalence of self-fixed ATD, time-to-fix differences between self-fixed and non--self-fixed items, and how factors related to code change and collaboration metrics relate to repayment speed. Using descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, and survival analysis, we show that self-fixed and non--self-fixed ATD exhibit distinct repayment dynamics and differences in how changes are shared on ATD-affected files. In particular, non--self-fixed ATD is more likely to remain unresolved longer when changes are spread across many developers. These results provide actionable guidance for maintainers to identify high-risk ATD items and to reduce handoff costs by increasing introducer involvement when possible and documenting the design rationale during repayment.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Investigating CI/CD-based Technical Debt Management in Open-source Projects

Managing technical debt (TD) is critical to ensure the sustainability of long-term software projects. However, the time and cost involved in technical debt management (TDM) often discourage practitioners from performing this activity consistently. Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines offer an opportunity to support TDM by embedding automated practices directly into the development workflow. Despite this potential, it remains unclear how TDM tools could be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, and we still lack established best practices for this process. To address this problem, the objective of this study is to understand how TDM tools have been used in CI/CD pipelines and also identify potential configuration anti-patterns. To this end, we conducted a large-scale mining software repository (MSR) study on GitHub. In total, we collected around 600,000 Travis CI configuration files and 50,000 supporting scripts, and identified 3,684 pipelines that contain at least one TDM tool. We applied descriptive statistics to analyze the prevalence of tools and anti-patterns, and our findings show that most tools are executed and integrated using an external script; in addition, \textit{Absent Feedback} is the most common configuration anti-pattern. We believe that researchers and practitioners can use the evidence of this study to further investigate how to improve both the tools that are integrated in CI/CD and the integration practices.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Reducing Labeling Effort in Architecture Technical Debt Detection through Active Learning and Explainable AI

Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) refers to technical compromises explicitly admitted by developers in natural language artifacts, such as code comments, commit messages, and issue trackers. Among its types, Architecture Technical Debt (ATD) is particularly difficult to detect due to its abstract and context-dependent nature. Manual annotation of ATD is costly, time-consuming, and challenging to scale. To reduce labeling effort, this study combines keyword-based filtering, active learning, and explainable AI for ATD detection. We refined an existing dataset of ATD-related Jira issues to obtain an expert-validated seed set used to extract representative keywords. These keywords were then applied to identify more than 103k candidate issues across 10 open-source projects. To assess the reliability of keyword-based filtering, we qualitatively evaluated a statistically representative sample of labeled issues. Building on the resulting dataset, we applied active learning with multiple query strategies to prioritize informative samples for annotation. The results show that Breaking Ties achieved the best performance, with an F1-score of 0.72 and a 49% reduction in annotation effort. To improve transparency, we used SHAP and LIME to explain ATD classification results. Expert evaluation showed that both methods provided useful explanations, with LIME generally preferred for its clarity and ease of use.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

SE Journals in 2036: Looking Back at the Future We Need to Have

In 2025, SE publishing faces an existential crisis of scalability. As our communities swell globally and integrate fast-moving methodologies like LLMs, traditional peer-review practices are collapsing under the strain. The "bureaucratic anomaly" of monolithic review has become mathematically unsustainable, creating a stochastic "lottery" that punishes novelty and exhausts researchers. This paper, written from the perspective of 2036, documents potential solutions. Here, the editors of ASE, EMSE, IST, JSS, TOSEM and TSE dream a collective dream of a brighter future. In summary first we stopped fighting (The Journal Alliance). Then we fixed the process (The Lottery / Unbundling / Fixing the Benchmark Graveyard). And then we fixed the culture (Cathedrals/Bazaars).

cs.SE↗
arXiv2025

Manifesto from Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 24452 -- Reframing Technical Debt

This is the Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 24452 manifesto on Reframing Technical Debt. The manifesto begins with a one-page summary of Values, Beliefs, and Principles. It then elaborates on each Value, Belief, and Principle to explain their rationale and clarify their meaning. Subsequently, the paper describes the current landscape of Technical Debt Management methods and tools and explains why the current practice is inadequate and where current research falls short. The current landscape is organized into five major topics: Technical Debt as Value-Creation, Tooling, Data Collection, the role of Architecture, and Socio-Technical Aspects. Finally, the paper outlines a roadmap to realize the stated principles, with concrete milestones to be addressed by researchers, software practitioners, and tool vendors. The manifesto is signed by the workshop participants.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2025

Designing a Syllabus for a Course on Empirical Software Engineering

Increasingly, courses on Empirical Software Engineering research methods are being offered in higher education institutes across the world, mostly at the M.Sc. and Ph.D. levels. While the need for such courses is evident and in line with modern software engineering curricula, educators designing and implementing such courses have so far been reinventing the wheel; every course is designed from scratch with little to no reuse of ideas or content across the community. Due to the nature of the topic, it is rather difficult to get it right the first time when defining the learning objectives, selecting the material, compiling a reader, and, more importantly, designing relevant and appropriate practical work. This leads to substantial effort (through numerous iterations) and poses risks to the course quality. This chapter attempts to support educators in the first and most crucial step in their course design: creating the syllabus. It does so by consolidating the collective experience of the authors as well as of members of the Empirical Software Engineering community; the latter was mined through two working sessions and an online survey. Specifically, it offers a list of the fundamental building blocks for a syllabus, namely course aims, course topics, and practical assignments. The course topics are also linked to the subsequent chapters of this book, so that readers can dig deeper into those chapters and get support on teaching specific research methods or cross-cutting topics. Finally, we guide educators on how to take these building blocks as a starting point and consider a number of relevant aspects to design a syllabus to meet the needs of their own program, students, and curriculum.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2025

Tracing the Lifecycle of Architecture Technical Debt in Software Systems: A Dependency Approach

Architectural technical debt (ATD) represents trade-offs in software architecture that accelerate initial development but create long-term maintenance challenges. ATD, in particular when self-admitted, impacts the foundational structure of software, making it difficult to detect and resolve. This study investigates the lifecycle of ATD, focusing on how it affects i) the connectivity between classes and ii) the frequency of file modifications. We aim to understand how ATD evolves from introduction to repayment and its implications on software architectures. Our empirical approach was applied to a dataset of SATD items extracted from various software artifacts. We isolated ATD instances, filtered for architectural indicators, and calculated dependencies at different lifecycle stages using FAN-IN and FAN-OUT metrics. Statistical analyses, including the Mann-Whitney U test and Cliff's Delta, were used to assess the significance and effect size of connectivity and dependency changes over time. We observed that ATD repayment increased class connectivity, with FAN-IN increasing by 57.5% on average and FAN-OUT by 26.7%, suggesting a shift toward centralization and increased architectural complexity after repayment. Moreover, ATD files were modified less frequently than Non-ATD files, with changes accumulated in high-dependency portions of the code. Our study shows that resolving ATD improves software quality in the short-term, but can make the architecture more complex by centralizing dependencies. Also, even if dependency metrics (like FAN-IN and FAN-OUT) can help understand the impact of ATD, they should be combined with other measures to capture other effects of ATD on software maintainability.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2025

Automating Technical Debt Management: Insights from Practitioner Discussions in Stack Exchange

Managing technical debt (TD) is essential for maintaining long-term software projects. Nonetheless, the time and cost involved in technical debt management (TDM) are often high, which may lead practitioners to omit TDM tasks. The adoption of tools, and particularly the usage of automated solutions, can potentially reduce the time, cost, and effort involved. However, the adoption of tools remains low, indicating the need for further research on TDM automation. To address this problem, this study aims at understanding which TDM activities practitioners are discussing with respect to automation in TDM, what tools they report for automating TDM, and the challenges they face that require automation solutions. To this end, we conducted a mining software repositories (MSR) study on three websites of Stack Exchange (Stack Overflow, Project Management, and Software Engineering) and collected 216 discussions, which were analyzed using both thematic synthesis and descriptive statistics. We found that identification and measurement are the most cited activities. Furthermore, 51 tools were reported as potential alternatives for TDM automation. Finally, a set of nine main challenges were identified and clustered into two main categories: challenges driving TDM automation and challenges related to tool usage. These findings highlight that tools for automating TDM are being discussed and used; however, several significant barriers persist, such as tool errors and poor explainability, hindering the adoption of these tools. Moreover, further research is needed to investigate the automation of other TDM activities such as TD prioritization.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2025

Teaching Empirical Research Methods in Software Engineering: An Editorial Introduction

Empirical Software Engineering has received much attention in recent years and became a de-facto standard for scientific practice in Software Engineering. However, while extensive guidelines are nowadays available for designing, conducting, reporting, and reviewing empirical studies, similar attention has not yet been paid to teaching empirical software engineering. Closing this gap is the scope of this edited book. In the following editorial introduction, we, the editors, set the foundation by laying out the larger context of the discipline for a positioning of the remainder of this book.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2024

PairSmell: A Novel Perspective Inspecting Software Modular Structure

Enhancing the modular structure of existing systems has attracted substantial research interest, focusing on two main methods: (1) software modularization and (2) identifying design issues (e.g., smells) as refactoring opportunities. However, re-modularization solutions often require extensive modifications to the original modules, and the design issues identified are generally too coarse to guide refactoring strategies. Combining the above two methods, this paper introduces a novel concept, PairSmell, which exploits modularization to pinpoint design issues necessitating refactoring. We concentrate on a granular but fundamental aspect of modularity principles -- modular relation (MR), i.e., whether a pair of entities are separated or collocated. The main assumption is that, if the actual MR of a pair violates its `apt MR', i.e., an MR agreed on by multiple modularization tools (as raters), it can be deemed likely a flawed architectural decision that necessitates further examination. To quantify and evaluate PairSmell, we conduct an empirical study on 20 C/C++ and Java projects, using 4 established modularization tools to identify two forms of PairSmell: inapt separated pairs InSep and inapt collocated pairs InCol. Our study on 260,003 instances reveals that their architectural impacts are substantial: (1) on average, 14.60% and 20.44% of software entities are involved in InSep and InCol MRs respectively; (2) InSep pairs are associated with 190% more co-changes than properly separated pairs, while InCol pairs are associated with 35% fewer co-changes than properly collocated pairs, both indicating a successful identification of modular structures detrimental to software quality; and (3) both forms of PairSmell persist across software evolution.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2024

Deep Learning and Data Augmentation for Detecting Self-Admitted Technical Debt

Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) refers to circumstances where developers use textual artifacts to explain why the existing implementation is not optimal. Past research in detecting SATD has focused on either identifying SATD (classifying SATD items as SATD or not) or categorizing SATD (labeling instances as SATD that pertain to requirement, design, code, test debt, etc.). However, the performance of these approaches remains suboptimal, particularly for specific types of SATD, such as test and requirement debt, primarily due to extremely imbalanced datasets. To address these challenges, we build on earlier research by utilizing BiLSTM architecture for the binary identification of SATD and BERT architecture for categorizing different types of SATD. Despite their effectiveness, both architectures struggle with imbalanced data. Therefore, we employ a large language model data augmentation strategy to mitigate this issue. Furthermore, we introduce a two-step approach to identify and categorize SATD across various datasets derived from different artifacts. Our contributions include providing a balanced dataset for future SATD researchers and demonstrating that our approach significantly improves SATD identification and categorization performance compared to baseline methods.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2024

Technical Debt Management: The Road Ahead for Successful Software Delivery

Technical Debt, considered by many to be the 'silent killer' of software projects, has undeniably become part of the everyday vocabulary of software engineers. We know it compromises the internal quality of a system, either deliberately or inadvertently. We understand Technical Debt is not all derogatory, often serving the purpose of expediency. But, it is associated with a clear risk, especially for large and complex systems with extended service life: if we do not properly manage Technical Debt, it threatens to "bankrupt" those systems. Software engineers and organizations that develop software-intensive systems are facing an increasingly more dire future state of those systems if they do not start incorporating Technical Debt management into their day to day practice. But how? What have the wins and losses of the past decade of research and practice in managing Technical Debt taught us and where should we focus next? In this paper, we examine the state of the art in both industry and research communities in managing Technical Debt; we subsequently distill the gaps in industrial practice and the research shortcomings, and synthesize them to define and articulate a vision for what Technical Debt management looks like five years hence.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2023

Technical Debt Management Automation: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Technical Debt (TD) refers to non-optimal decisions made in software projects that may lead to short-term benefits, but potentially harm the system's maintenance in the long-term. Technical debt management (TDM) refers to a set of activities that are performed to handle TD, e.g., identification. These activities can entail tasks such as code and architectural analysis, which can be time-consuming if done manually. Thus, substantial research work has focused on automating TDM tasks (e.g., automatic identification of code smells). However, there is a lack of studies that summarize current approaches in TDM automation. This can hinder practitioners in selecting optimal automation strategies to efficiently manage TD. It can also prevent researchers from understanding the research landscape and addressing the research problems that matter the most. Thus, the main objective of this study is to provide an overview of the state of the art in TDM automation, analyzing the available tools, their use, and the challenges in automating TDM. For this, we conducted a systematic mapping study (SMS), and from an initial set of 1086 primary studies, 178 were selected to answer three research questions covering different facets of TDM automation. We found 121 automation artifacts, which were classified in 4 different types (i.e., tools, plugins, scripts, and bots); the inputs/outputs and interfaces were also collected and reported. Finally, a conceptual model is proposed that synthesizes the results and allows to discuss the current state of TDM automation and related challenges. The results show that the research community has investigated to a large extent how to perform various TDM activities automatically, considering the number of studies and automation artifacts we identified. More research is needed towards fully automated TDM, specially concerning the integration of the automation artifacts.

cs.SE↗