arXiv subjects

Pasin Manurangsi

Publications and source records attributed to Pasin Manurangsi.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

Fixing Knockout Tournaments With Seeds

Knockout tournaments constitute a popular format for organizing sports competitions. While prior results have shown that it is often possible to manipulate a knockout tournament by fixing the bracket, these results ignore the prevalent aspect of player seeds, which can significantly constrain the chosen bracket. We show that certain structural conditions that guarantee that a player can win a knockout tournament without seeds are no longer sufficient in light of seed constraints. On the other hand, we prove that when the pairwise match outcomes are generated randomly, all players are still likely to be knockout winners under the same probability threshold with seeds as without seeds. In addition, we investigate the complexity of deciding whether a manipulation is possible when seeds are present.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Generalized Kings and Single-Elimination Winners in Random Tournaments

Tournaments can be used to model a variety of practical scenarios including sports competitions and elections. A natural notion of strength of alternatives in a tournament is a generalized king: an alternative is said to be a $k$-king if it can reach every other alternative in the tournament via a directed path of length at most $k$. In this paper, we provide an almost complete characterization of the probability threshold such that all, a large number, or a small number of alternatives are $k$-kings with high probability in two random models. We show that, perhaps surprisingly, all changes in the threshold occur in the range of constant $k$, with the biggest change being between $k=2$ and $k=3$. In addition, we establish an asymptotically tight bound on the probability threshold for which all alternatives are likely able to win a single-elimination tournament under some bracket.

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

Parameterized Approximation Algorithms for Bidirected Steiner Network Problems

The Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem takes as input a directed edge-weighted graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $\mathcal{D}\subseteq V\times V$ of $k$ demand pairs. The aim is to compute the cheapest network $N\subseteq G$ for which there is an $s\to t$ path for each $(s,t)\in\mathcal{D}$. It is known that this problem is notoriously hard as there is no $k^{1/4-o(1)}$-approximation algorithm under Gap-ETH, even when parametrizing the runtime by $k$ [Dinur & Manurangsi, ITCS 2018]. In light of this, we systematically study several special cases of DSN and determine their parameterized approximability for the parameter $k$. For the bi-DSN$_\text{Planar}$ problem, the aim is to compute a solution $N\subseteq G$ whose cost is at most that of an optimum planar solution in a bidirected graph $G$, i.e., for every edge $uv$ of $G$ the reverse edge $vu$ exists and has the same weight. This problem is a generalization of several well-studied special cases. Our main result is that this problem admits a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for $k$. We also prove that our result is tight in the sense that (a) the runtime of our PAS cannot be significantly improved, and (b) it is unlikely that a PAS exists for any generalization of bi-DSN$_\text{Planar}$, unless FPT=W[1]. One important special case of DSN is the Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (SCSS) problem, for which the solution network $N\subseteq G$ needs to strongly connect a given set of $k$ terminals. It has been observed before that for SCSS a parameterized $2$-approximation exists when parameterized by $k$ [Chitnis et al., IPEC 2013]. We give a tight inapproximability result by showing that for $k$ no parameterized $(2-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm exists under Gap-ETH. Additionally we show that when restricting the input of SCSS to bidirected graphs, the problem remains NP-hard but becomes FPT for $k$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Differentially Private All-Pairs Shortest Path Distances: Improved Algorithms and Lower Bounds

We study the problem of releasing the weights of all-pair shortest paths in a weighted undirected graph with differential privacy (DP). In this setting, the underlying graph is fixed and two graphs are neighbors if their edge weights differ by at most $1$ in the $\ell_1$-distance. We give an $ε$-DP algorithm with additive error $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3} / ε)$ and an $(ε, δ)$-DP algorithm with additive error $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n} / ε)$ where $n$ denotes the number of vertices. This positively answers a question of Sealfon (PODS'16), who asked whether a $o(n)$-error algorithm exists. We also show that an additive error of $Ω(n^{1/6})$ is necessary for any sufficiently small $ε, δ> 0$. Finally, we consider a relaxed setting where a multiplicative approximation is allowed. We show that, with a multiplicative approximation factor $k$, %$2k - 1$, the additive error can be reduced to $\tilde{O}\left(n^{1/2 + O(1/k)} / ε\right)$ in the $ε$-DP case and $\tilde{O}(n^{1/3 + O(1/k)} / ε)$ in the $(ε, δ)$-DP case, respectively.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Improved Approximation Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Search-Diversification Problems

We study several questions related to diversifying search results. We give improved approximation algorithms in each of the following problems, together with some lower bounds. - We give a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for a diversified search ranking problem [Bansal et al., ICALP 2010] whose objective is to minimizes the discounted cumulative gain. Our PTAS runs in time $n^{2^{O(\log(1/ε)/ε)}} \cdot m^{O(1)}$ where $n$ denotes the number of elements in the databases. Complementing this, we show that no PTAS can run in time $f(ε) \cdot (nm)^{2^{o(1/ε)}}$ assuming Gap-ETH; therefore our running time is nearly tight. Both of our bounds answer open questions of Bansal et al. - We next consider the Max-Sum Dispersion problem, whose objective is to select $k$ out of $n$ elements that maximizes the dispersion, which is defined as the sum of the pairwise distances under a given metric. We give a quasipolynomial-time approximation scheme for the problem which runs in time $n^{O_ε(\log n)}$. This improves upon previously known polynomial-time algorithms with approximate ratios 0.5 [Hassin et al., Oper. Res. Lett. 1997; Borodin et al., ACM Trans. Algorithms 2017]. Furthermore, we observe that known reductions rule out approximation schemes that run in $n^{\tilde{o}_ε(\log n)}$ time assuming ETH. - We consider a generalization of Max-Sum Dispersion called Max-Sum Diversification. In addition to the sum of pairwise distance, the objective includes another function $f$. For monotone submodular $f$, we give a quasipolynomial-time algorithm with approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $(1 - 1/e)$. This improves upon the best polynomial-time algorithm which has approximation ratio $0.5$ by Borodin et al. Furthermore, the $(1 - 1/e)$ factor is tight as achieving better-than-$(1 - 1/e)$ approximation is NP-hard [Feige, J. ACM 1998].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Private Rank Aggregation in Central and Local Models

In social choice theory, (Kemeny) rank aggregation is a well-studied problem where the goal is to combine rankings from multiple voters into a single ranking on the same set of items. Since rankings can reveal preferences of voters (which a voter might like to keep private), it is important to aggregate preferences in such a way to preserve privacy. In this work, we present differentially private algorithms for rank aggregation in the pure and approximate settings along with distribution-independent utility upper and lower bounds. In addition to bounds in the central model, we also present utility bounds for the local model of differential privacy.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

User-Level Private Learning via Correlated Sampling

Most works in learning with differential privacy (DP) have focused on the setting where each user has a single sample. In this work, we consider the setting where each user holds $m$ samples and the privacy protection is enforced at the level of each user's data. We show that, in this setting, we may learn with a much fewer number of users. Specifically, we show that, as long as each user receives sufficiently many samples, we can learn any privately learnable class via an $(ε, δ)$-DP algorithm using only $O(\log(1/δ)/ε)$ users. For $ε$-DP algorithms, we show that we can learn using only $O_ε(d)$ users even in the local model, where $d$ is the probabilistic representation dimension. In both cases, we show a nearly-matching lower bound on the number of users required. A crucial component of our results is a generalization of global stability [Bun et al., FOCS 2020] that allows the use of public randomness. Under this relaxed notion, we employ a correlated sampling strategy to show that the global stability can be boosted to be arbitrarily close to one, at a polynomial expense in the number of samples.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

The Price of Justified Representation

In multiwinner approval voting, the goal is to select $k$-member committees based on voters' approval ballots. A well-studied concept of proportionality in this context is the justified representation (JR) axiom, which demands that no large cohesive group of voters remains unrepresented. However, the JR axiom may conflict with other desiderata, such as coverage (maximizing the number of voters who approve at least one committee member) or social welfare (maximizing the number of approvals obtained by committee members). In this work, we investigate the impact of imposing the JR axiom (as well as the more demanding EJR axiom) on social welfare and coverage. Our approach is threefold: we derive worst-case bounds on the loss of welfare/coverage that is caused by imposing JR, study the computational complexity of finding 'good' committees that provide JR (obtaining a hardness result, an approximation algorithm, and an exact algorithm for one-dimensional preferences), and examine this setting empirically on several synthetic datasets.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Private Robust Estimation by Stabilizing Convex Relaxations

We give the first polynomial time and sample $(ε, δ)$-differentially private (DP) algorithm to estimate the mean, covariance and higher moments in the presence of a constant fraction of adversarial outliers. Our algorithm succeeds for families of distributions that satisfy two well-studied properties in prior works on robust estimation: certifiable subgaussianity of directional moments and certifiable hypercontractivity of degree 2 polynomials. Our recovery guarantees hold in the "right affine-invariant norms": Mahalanobis distance for mean, multiplicative spectral and relative Frobenius distance guarantees for covariance and injective norms for higher moments. Prior works obtained private robust algorithms for mean estimation of subgaussian distributions with bounded covariance. For covariance estimation, ours is the first efficient algorithm (even in the absence of outliers) that succeeds without any condition-number assumptions. Our algorithms arise from a new framework that provides a general blueprint for modifying convex relaxations for robust estimation to satisfy strong worst-case stability guarantees in the appropriate parameter norms whenever the algorithms produce witnesses of correctness in their run. We verify such guarantees for a modification of standard sum-of-squares (SoS) semidefinite programming relaxations for robust estimation. Our privacy guarantees are obtained by combining stability guarantees with a new "estimate dependent" noise injection mechanism in which noise scales with the eigenvalues of the estimated covariance. We believe this framework will be useful more generally in obtaining DP counterparts of robust estimators. Independently of our work, Ashtiani and Liaw [AL21] also obtained a polynomial time and sample private robust estimation algorithm for Gaussian distributions.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2021

Tight Bounds for Differentially Private Anonymized Histograms

In this note, we consider the problem of differentially privately (DP) computing an anonymized histogram, which is defined as the multiset of counts of the input dataset (without bucket labels). In the low-privacy regime $ε\geq 1$, we give an $ε$-DP algorithm with an expected $\ell_1$-error bound of $O(\sqrt{n} / e^ε)$. In the high-privacy regime $ε< 1$, we give an $Ω(\sqrt{n \log(1/ε) / ε})$ lower bound on the expected $\ell_1$ error. In both cases, our bounds asymptotically match the previously known lower/upper bounds due to [Suresh, NeurIPS 2019].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacy

The Randomized Response (RR) algorithm is a classical technique to improve robustness in survey aggregation, and has been widely adopted in applications with differential privacy guarantees. We propose a novel algorithm, Randomized Response with Prior (RRWithPrior), which can provide more accurate results while maintaining the same level of privacy guaranteed by RR. We then apply RRWithPrior to learn neural networks with label differential privacy (LabelDP), and show that when only the label needs to be protected, the model performance can be significantly improved over the previous state-of-the-art private baselines. Moreover, we study different ways to obtain priors, which when used with RRWithPrior can additionally improve the model performance, further reducing the accuracy gap between private and non-private models. We complement the empirical results with theoretical analysis showing that LabelDP is provably easier than protecting both the inputs and labels.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single Message

The shuffle model of differential privacy has attracted attention in the literature due to it being a middle ground between the well-studied central and local models. In this work, we study the problem of summing (aggregating) real numbers or integers, a basic primitive in numerous machine learning tasks, in the shuffle model. We give a protocol achieving error arbitrarily close to that of the (Discrete) Laplace mechanism in the central model, while each user only sends $1 + o(1)$ short messages in expectation.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2021

Large-Scale Differentially Private BERT

In this work, we study the large-scale pretraining of BERT-Large with differentially private SGD (DP-SGD). We show that combined with a careful implementation, scaling up the batch size to millions (i.e., mega-batches) improves the utility of the DP-SGD step for BERT; we also enhance its efficiency by using an increasing batch size schedule. Our implementation builds on the recent work of [SVK20], who demonstrated that the overhead of a DP-SGD step is minimized with effective use of JAX [BFH+18, FJL18] primitives in conjunction with the XLA compiler [XLA17]. Our implementation achieves a masked language model accuracy of 60.5% at a batch size of 2M, for $ε= 5.36$. To put this number in perspective, non-private BERT models achieve an accuracy of $\sim$70%.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Google COVID-19 Vaccination Search Insights: Anonymization Process Description

This report describes the aggregation and anonymization process applied to the COVID-19 Vaccination Search Insights (published at http://goo.gle/covid19vaccinationinsights), a publicly available dataset showing aggregated and anonymized trends in Google searches related to COVID-19 vaccination. The applied anonymization techniques protect every user's daily search activity related to COVID-19 vaccinations with $(\varepsilon, δ)$-differential privacy for $\varepsilon = 2.19$ and $δ= 10^{-5}$.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2021

Linear Discrepancy is $Π_2$-Hard to Approximate

In this note, we prove that the problem of computing the linear discrepancy of a given matrix is $Π_2$-hard, even to approximate within $9/8 - ε$ factor for any $ε> 0$. This strengthens the NP-hardness result of Li and Nikolov [ESA 2020] for the exact version of the problem, and answers a question posed by them. Furthermore, since Li and Nikolov showed that the problem is contained in $Π_2$, our result makes linear discrepancy another natural problem that is $Π_2$-complete (to approximate).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2021

On the Complexity of Fair House Allocation

We study fairness in house allocation, where $m$ houses are to be allocated among $n$ agents so that every agent receives one house. We show that maximizing the number of envy-free agents is hard to approximate to within a factor of $n^{1-γ}$ for any constant $γ>0$, and that the exact version is NP-hard even for binary utilities. Moreover, we prove that deciding whether a proportional allocation exists is computationally hard, whereas the corresponding problem for equitability can be solved efficiently.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Contextual Recommendations and Low-Regret Cutting-Plane Algorithms

We consider the following variant of contextual linear bandits motivated by routing applications in navigational engines and recommendation systems. We wish to learn a hidden $d$-dimensional value $w^*$. Every round, we are presented with a subset $\mathcal{X}_t \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ of possible actions. If we choose (i.e. recommend to the user) action $x_t$, we obtain utility $\langle x_t, w^* \rangle$ but only learn the identity of the best action $\arg\max_{x \in \mathcal{X}_t} \langle x, w^* \rangle$. We design algorithms for this problem which achieve regret $O(d\log T)$ and $\exp(O(d \log d))$. To accomplish this, we design novel cutting-plane algorithms with low "regret" -- the total distance between the true point $w^*$ and the hyperplanes the separation oracle returns. We also consider the variant where we are allowed to provide a list of several recommendations. In this variant, we give an algorithm with $O(d^2 \log d)$ regret and list size $\mathrm{poly}(d)$. Finally, we construct nearly tight algorithms for a weaker variant of this problem where the learner only learns the identity of an action that is better than the recommendation. Our results rely on new algorithmic techniques in convex geometry (including a variant of Steiner's formula for the centroid of a convex set) which may be of independent interest.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication Overhead

Differential privacy (DP) is a formal notion for quantifying the privacy loss of algorithms. Algorithms in the central model of DP achieve high accuracy but make the strongest trust assumptions whereas those in the local DP model make the weakest trust assumptions but incur substantial accuracy loss. The shuffled DP model (Bittau et al., 2017; Erlingsson et al., 2019; Cheu et al., 2019) has recently emerged as a feasible middle ground between the central and local models, providing stronger trust assumptions than the former while promising higher accuracies than the latter. In this paper, we obtain practical communication-efficient algorithms in the shuffled DP model for two basic aggregation primitives used in machine learning: 1) binary summation, and 2) histograms over a moderate number of buckets. Our algorithms achieve accuracy that is arbitrarily close to that of central DP algorithms with an expected communication per user essentially matching what is needed without any privacy constraints! We demonstrate the practicality of our algorithms by experimentally comparing their performance to several widely-used protocols such as Randomized Response (Warner, 1965) and RAPPOR (Erlingsson et al., 2014).

cs.CR↗