SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Paul M. Gartside

Publications and source records attributed to Paul M. Gartside.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Box and Nabla Products that are D-Spaces

A space $X$ is $D$ if for every assignment, $U$, of an open neighborhood to each point $x$ in $X$ there is a closed discrete $D$ such that $\bigcup \{U(x) : x \in D\}=X$. The box product, $\square X^ω$, is $X^ω$ with topology generated by all $\prod_n U_n$, where every $U_n$ is open. The nabla product, $\nabla X^ω$, is obtained from $\square X^ω$ by quotienting out mod-finite. The weight of $X$, $w(X)$, is the minimal size of a base, while $\mathfrak{d}=\mathop{cof} ω^ω$. It is shown that there are specific compact spaces $X$ such that $\square X^ω$ and $\nabla X^ω$ are not $D$, but: (1) $\square X^ω$ and $\nabla X^ω$ are hereditarily $D$ if $X$ is scattered and either hereditarily paracompact or of finite scattered height, or if $X$ is metrizable (and $w(X)\le \mathfrak{d}$ for $\square X^ω$); (2) $\nabla X^ω$ is hereditarily $D$ if $X$ is first countable and $w(X)\le ω_1$, or consistently if $X$ is first countable and $|X|\le \mathfrak{c}$, or $w(X)\le ω_1$; and (3) $\square X^ω$ is $D$ consistently if $X$ is compact and either first countable or $w(X)\le ω_1$.

math.GN

Monotone Normality and Nabla-Products

Roitman's combinatorial principle $Δ$ is equivalent to monotone normality of the nabla product, $\nabla (ω+1)^ω$. If $\{ X_n : n\in ω\}$ is a family of metrizable spaces and $\nabla_n X_n$ is monotonically normal, then $\nabla_n X_n$ is hereditarily paracompact. Hence, if $Δ$ holds then the box product $\square (ω+1)^ω$ is paracompact. Large fragments of $Δ$ hold in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, yielding large subspaces of $\nabla (ω+1)^ω$ that are `really' monotonically normal. Countable nabla products of metrizable spaces which are respectively: arbitrary, of size $\le \mathfrak{c}$, or separable, are monotonically normal under respectively: $\mathfrak{b}=\mathfrak{d}$, $\mathfrak{d}=\mathfrak{c}$ or the Model Hypothesis. It is consistent and independent that $\nabla A(ω_1)^ω$ and $\nabla (ω_1+1)^ω$ are hereditarily normal (or hereditarily paracompact, or monotonically normal). In $\mathsf{ZFC}$ neither $\nabla A(ω_2)^ω$ nor $\nabla (ω_2+1)^ω$ is hereditarily normal.

math.GN