arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Paul Seymour.
In [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 70 (1997), 2-44] we gave a simplified proof of the Four-Color Theorem. The proof is computer-assisted in the sense that for two lemmas in the article we did not give proofs, and instead asserted that we have verified those statements using a computer. Here we give additional details for one of those lemmas, and we include the original computer programs and data as "ancillary files" accompanying this submission.
We introduce a notion of bipartite minors and prove a bipartite analog of Wagner's theorem: a bipartite graph is planar if and only if it does not contain $K_{3,3}$ as a bipartite minor. Similarly, we provide a forbidden minor characterization for outerplanar graphs and forests. We then establish a recursive characterization of bipartite $(2,2)$-Laman graphs --- a certain family of graphs that contains all maximal bipartite planar graphs.
A {\em net} is a graph consisting of a triangle $C$ and three more vertices, each of degree one and with its neighbour in $C$, and all adjacent to different vertices of $C$. We give a polynomial-time algorithm to test whether an input graph has an induced subgraph which is a subdivision of a net. Unlike many similar questions, this does not seem to be solvable by an application of the "three-in-a-tree" subroutine.
Fix g>1. Every graph of large enough tree-width contains a g x g grid as a minor; but here we prove that every four-edge-connected graph of large enough tree-width contains a g x g grid as an immersion (and hence contains any fixed graph with maximum degree at most four as an immersion). This result has a number of applications.
Intuitively, a tangle of large order in a graph is a highly-connected part of the graph, and it is known that if a graph has a tangle of large order then it has a large grid minor. Here we show that for any k, if G has a tangle of large order and Z is a set of vertices of cardinality k that cannot be separated from the tangle by any separation of order less than k, then G has a large grid minor containing Z, in which the members of Z all belong to the outside of the grid. This is a lemma for use in a later paper.
A finite tree $T$ with $|V(T)| \geq 2$ is called {\it automorphism-free} if there is no non-trivial automorphism of $T$. Let $\mathcal{AFT}$ be the poset with the element set of all finite automorphism-free trees (up to graph isomorphism) ordered by $T_1 \preceq T_2$ if $T_1$ can be obtained from $T_2$ by successively deleting one leaf at a time in such a way that each intermediate tree is also automorphism-free. In this paper, we prove that $\mathcal{AFT}$ has a unique minimal element. This result gives an affirmative answer to the question asked by Rupinski.
For a graph $G$ and a set of graphs $\mathcal{H}$, we say that $G$ is {\em $\mathcal{H}$-free} if no induced subgraph of $G$ is isomorphic to a member of $\mathcal{H}$. Given an integer $P>0$, a graph $G$, and a set of graphs $\mathcal{F}$, we say that $G$ {\em admits an $(\mathcal{F},P)$-partition} if the vertex set of $G$ can be partitioned into $P$ subsets $X_1,..., X_P$, so that for every $i \in \{1,..., P\}$, either $|X_i|=1$, or the subgraph of $G$ induced by $X_i$ is $\{F\}$-free for some $F \in \mathcal{F}$. Our first result is the following. For every pair $(H,J)$ of graphs such that $H$ is the disjoint union of two graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$, and the complement $J^c$ of $J$ is the disjoint union of two graphs $J_1^c$ and $J_2^c$, there exists an integer $P>0$ such that every $\{H,J\}$-free graph has an $(\{H_1,H_2,J_1,J_2\},P)$-partition. Using a similar idea we also give a short proof of one of the results of \cite{heroes}. Our final result is a construction showing that if $\{H,J\}$ are graphs each with at least one edge, then for every pair of integers $r,k$ there exists a graph $G$ such that every $r$-vertex induced subgraph of $G$ is $\{H,J\}$-split, but $G$ does not admits an $(\{H,J\},k)$-partition.
Say a digraph is k-free if it has no directed cycles of length at most k, for positive integers k. Thomasse conjectured that the number of induced 3-vertex directed paths in a simple 2-free digraph on n vertices is at most (n-1)n(n+1)/15. We present an unpublished result of Bondy proving that there are at most 2n^3/25 such paths, and prove that for the class of circular interval digraphs, an upper bound of n^3/16 holds. We also study the problem of bounding the number of (non-induced) 4-vertex paths in 3-free digraphs. We show an upper bound of 4n^4/75 using Bondy's result for Thomasse's conjecture.
A conjecture due to the fourth author states that every $d$-regular planar multigraph can be $d$-edge-coloured, provided that for every odd set $X$ of vertices, there are at least $d$ edges between $X$ and its complement. For $d = 3$ this is the four-colour theorem, and the conjecture has been proved for all $d\le 8$, by various authors. In particular, two of us proved it when $d=7$; and then three of us proved it when $d=8$. The methods used for the latter give a proof in the $d=7$ case that is simpler than the original, and we present it here.
It was conjectured by the third author in about 1973 that every $d$-regular planar graph (possibly with parallel edges) can be $d$-edge-coloured, provided that for every odd set $X$ of vertices, there are at least $d$ edges between $X$ and its complement. For $d = 3$ this is the four-colour theorem, and the conjecture has been proved for all $d\le 7$, by various authors. Here we prove it for $d = 8$.
We say a digraph $G$ is a {\em minor} of a digraph $H$ if $G$ can be obtained from a subdigraph of $H$ by repeatedly contracting a strongly-connected subdigraph to a vertex. Here, we show the class of all tournaments is a well-quasi-order under minor containment.
Reed's $ω$, $Δ$, $χ$ conjecture proposes that every graph satisfies $χ\leq \lceil\frac 12(Δ+1+ω)\rceil$; it is known to hold for all claw-free graphs. In this paper we consider a local strengthening of this conjecture. We prove the local strengthening for line graphs, then note that previous results immediately tell us that the local strengthening holds for all quasi-line graphs. Our proofs lead to polytime algorithms for constructing colourings that achieve our bounds: $O(n^2)$ for line graphs and $O(n^3m^2)$ for quasi-line graphs. For line graphs, this is faster than the best known algorithm for constructing a colouring that achieves the bound of Reed's original conjecture.
Let G be a digraph (without parallel edges) such that every directed cycle has length at least four; let $β(G)$ denote the size of the smallest subset X in E(G) such that $G\X$ has no directed cycles, and let $γ(G)$ be the number of unordered pairs {u,v} of vertices such that u,v are nonadjacent in G. It is easy to see that if $γ(G) = 0$ then $β(G) = 0$; what can we say about $β(G)$ if $γ(G)$ is bounded? We prove that in general $β(G)$ is at most $γ(G)$. We conjecture that in fact $β(G)$ is at most $γ(G)/2$ (this would be best possible if true), and prove this conjecture in two special cases: 1. when V(G) is the union of two cliques, 2. when the vertices of G can be arranged in a circle such that if distinct u,v,w are in clockwise order and uw is a (directed) edge, then so are both uv and vw.
A graph G is perfect if for every induced subgraph H, the chromatic number of H equals the size of the largest complete subgraph of H, and G is Berge if no induced subgraph of G is an odd cycle of length at least 5 or the complement of one. The "strong perfect graph conjecture" (Berge, 1961) asserts that a graph is perfect if and only if it is Berge. A stronger conjecture was made recently by Conforti, Cornuejols and Vuskovic -- that every Berge graph either falls into one of a few basic classes, or it has a kind of separation that cannot occur in a minimal imperfect graph. In this paper we prove both these conjectures.
We announce results about flat (linkless) embeddings of graphs in 3-space. A piecewise-linear embedding of a graph in 3-space is called {\it flat} if every circuit of the graph bounds a disk disjoint from the rest of the graph. We have shown: (i) An embedding is flat if and only if the fundamental group of the complement in 3-space of the embedding of every subgraph is free. (ii) If two flat embeddings of the same graph are not ambient isotopic, then they differ on a subdivision of $K_5$ or $K_{3,3}$. (iii) Any flat embedding of a graph can be transformed to any other flat embedding of the same graph by ``3-switches'', an analog of 2-switches from the theory of planar embeddings. In particular, any two flat embeddings of a 4-connected graph are either ambient isotopic, or one is ambient isotopic to a mirror image of the other. (iv) A graph has a flat embedding if and only if it has no minor isomorphic to one of seven specified graphs. These are the graphs that can be obtained from $K_6$ by means of $YΔ$- and $ΔY$-exchanges.