arXiv subjects

Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna

Publications and source records attributed to Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Omitted Variable Bias in Difference-in-Differences Designs

We study the omitted variable bias (OVB) problem in canonical difference-in-differences (DiD) designs when unobserved confounding induces departures from the parallel trends assumption. Our results provide a novel characterization of the OVB formula for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), which is of independent interest. We show how the ATT bias is mainly governed by the strength of confounding in the treatment assignment mechanism and provide alternative ways of quantifying this strength, such as (i) changes in the average odds of treatment among the treated, (ii) confounding imbalance between treated and control units, or (iii) variation explained in treatment odds among the untreated. Building on these results, we offer sensitivity statistics for routine reporting, describing the minimum strength of confounding required to overturn the conclusions of a DiD study, as well as formal bounds on the strength of confounders based on comparisons to observed covariates or pre-trends. Finally, we provide flexible and efficient statistical inference methods for the bounds on ATT, which can leverage modern machine learning algorithms for estimation. We demonstrate the utility of our approach in an empirical example that estimates the effects of minimum wage on teen employment.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Selection and parallel trends

We study the role of selection into treatment in difference-in-differences (DiD) designs. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for parallel trends assumptions under general classes of selection mechanisms. These conditions characterize the empirical content of parallel trends and clarify the trade-offs between assumptions about selection into treatment and restrictions on the time series properties of the potential outcomes required for DiD methods. We use the necessary and sufficient conditions to provide a selection-based decomposition of the bias of DiD and provide easy-to-implement strategies for benchmarking its components. We also provide templates for justifying DiD in applications with and without covariates. Reanalyses of the causal effect of NSW training programs and the effect of the Medicaid expansion demonstrate the usefulness of our selection-based approach to benchmarking the bias of DiD.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Was Javert right to be suspicious? Marginal Treatment Effects with Duration Outcomes

We identify the distributional and quantile marginal treatment effect functions when the outcome is right-censored. Our method requires a conditionally exogenous instrument and random censoring. We propose asymptotically consistent semi-parametric estimators and valid inferential procedures for the target functions. To illustrate, we evaluate the effect of alternative sentences (fines and community service vs. no punishment) on recidivism in Brazil. Our results highlight substantial treatment effect heterogeneity: we find that people whom most judges would punish take longer to recidivate, while people who would be punished only by strict judges recidivate at an earlier date than if they were not punished.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Doubly Robust Estimators with Weak Overlap

Doubly robust (DR) estimators guard against model misspecification but remain sensitive to weak covariate overlap. We show that trimming propensity scores reduces variance but eliminates double robustness. We introduce DR estimators that retain double robustness after trimming through bias correction, preserving the original causal targets across unconfoundedness, instrumental variables, and difference-in-differences designs. In four applications, the proposed estimator yields more precise estimates: ruling out large mortality effects of Medicaid expansion, detecting workforce growth from mental health reform, recovering the Black--White test score gap without strong functional form restrictions, and recovering a positive 401(k) savings effect consistent with the prior literature.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

Difference-in-Differences with a Continuous Treatment

This paper analyzes difference-in-differences designs with a continuous treatment. We show that treatment-on-the-treated-type parameters are identified under a parallel trends assumption analogous to the binary treatment case. However, comparing these parameters across treatments is challenging because parallel trends does not rule out selection bias. We discuss alternative, typically stronger, assumptions that eliminate selection bias. We further show that popular two-way fixed effects estimands admit multiple interpretations, depending on the underlying causal building block, all having important limitations as meaningful summaries of treatment effects. Finally, we introduce alternative estimation procedures that avoid these drawbacks and demonstrate them in an empirical application.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

Beyond Parallel Trends: An Identification-Strategy-Robust Approach to Causal Inference with Panel Data

In this paper, we propose a new approach to causal inference with panel data. Instead of using panel data to adjust for differences in the distribution of unobserved heterogeneity between the treated and comparison groups, we instead use panel data to search for "close comparison groups" -- groups that are similar to the treated group in terms of pre-treatment outcomes. Then, we compare the outcomes of the treated group to the outcomes of these close comparison groups in post-treatment periods. We show that this approach is often identification-strategy-robust in the sense that our approach recovers the ATT under many different non-nested panel data identification strategies, including difference-in-differences, change-in-changes, or lagged outcome unconfoundedness, among several others. We provide related, though non-nested, results under "time homogeneity", where outcomes do not systematically change over time for any comparison group. Our strategy asks more out of the research design -- namely that there exist close comparison groups or time homogeneity (neither of which is required for most existing panel data approaches to causal inference) -- but, when available, leads to more credible inferences.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

Difference-in-Differences with Compositional Changes

This paper studies Difference-in-Differences (DiD) setups with repeated cross-sectional data and potential compositional changes across time periods. We begin our analysis by deriving the efficient influence function and the semiparametric efficiency bound for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). We introduce nonparametric estimators that attain the semiparametric efficiency bound under mild rate conditions on the estimators of the nuisance functions, exhibiting a type of rate doubly robust (DR) property. Additionally, we document a trade-off related to compositional changes: We derive the asymptotic bias of DR DiD estimators that erroneously exclude compositional changes and the efficiency loss when one fails to correctly rule out compositional changes. We propose a nonparametric Hausman-type test for compositional changes based on these trade-offs. The finite sample performance of the proposed DiD tools is evaluated through Monte Carlo experiments and an empirical application. We consider extensions of our framework that accommodate double machine learning procedures with cross-fitting, and setups when some units are observed in both pre- and post-treatment periods. As a by-product of our analysis, we present a new uniform stochastic expansion of the local polynomial multinomial logit estimator, which may be of independent interest.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

Better Understanding Triple Differences Estimators

Triple Differences (DDD) designs are widely used in empirical work to relax parallel trends assumptions in Difference-in-Differences (DiD) settings. This paper highlights that common DDD implementations -- such as taking the difference between two DiDs or applying three-way fixed effects regressions -- are generally invalid when identification requires conditioning on covariates. In staggered adoption settings, the common DiD practice of pooling all not-yet-treated units as a comparison group can introduce additional bias, even when covariates are not required for identification. These insights challenge conventional empirical strategies and underscore the need for estimators tailored specifically to DDD structures. We develop regression adjustment, inverse probability weighting, and doubly robust estimators that remain valid under covariate-adjusted DDD parallel trends. For staggered designs, we demonstrate how to effectively utilize multiple comparison groups to obtain more informative inferences. Simulations and three empirical applications highlight bias reductions and precision gains relative to standard approaches. A companion R package is available.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

Efficient Difference-in-Differences and Event Study Estimators

This paper investigates efficient Difference-in-Differences (DiD) and Event Study (ES) estimation using short panel data sets within the heterogeneous treatment effect framework, free from parametric functional form assumptions and allowing for variation in treatment timing. We provide an equivalent characterization of the DiD potential outcome model using sequential conditional moment restrictions on observables, which shows that the DiD identification assumptions typically imply nonparametric overidentification restrictions. We derive the semiparametric efficient influence function (EIF) in closed form for DiD and ES causal parameters under commonly imposed parallel trends assumptions. The EIF is automatically Neyman orthogonal and yields the smallest variance among all asymptotically normal, regular estimators of the DiD and ES parameters. Leveraging the EIF, we propose simple-to-compute efficient estimators. Our results highlight how to optimally explore different pre-treatment periods and comparison groups to obtain the tightest (asymptotic) confidence intervals, offering practical tools for improving inference in modern DiD and ES applications even in small samples. Calibrated simulations and an empirical application demonstrate substantial precision gains of our efficient estimators in finite samples.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner's Guide

Difference-in-differences (DiD) is arguably the most popular quasi-experimental research design. Its canonical form, with two groups and two periods, is well-understood. However, empirical practices can be ad hoc when researchers go beyond that simple case. This article provides an organizing framework for discussing different types of DiD designs and their associated DiD estimators. It discusses covariates, weights, handling multiple periods, and staggered treatments. The organizational framework, however, applies to other extensions of DiD methods as well.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2023

Efficient Estimation for Staggered Rollout Designs

We study estimation of causal effects in staggered rollout designs, i.e. settings where there is staggered treatment adoption and the timing of treatment is as-good-as randomly assigned. We derive the most efficient estimator in a class of estimators that nests several popular generalized difference-in-differences methods. A feasible plug-in version of the efficient estimator is asymptotically unbiased with efficiency (weakly) dominating that of existing approaches. We provide both $t$-based and permutation-test-based methods for inference. In an application to a training program for police officers, confidence intervals for the proposed estimator are as much as eight times shorter than for existing approaches.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2023

Specification tests for generalized propensity scores using double projections

This paper proposes a new class of nonparametric tests for the correct specification of models based on conditional moment restrictions, paying particular attention to generalized propensity score models. The test procedure is based on two different projection arguments, leading to test statistics that are suitable to setups with many covariates, and are (asymptotically) invariant to the estimation method used to estimate the nuisance parameters. We show that our proposed tests are able to detect a broad class of local alternatives converging to the null at the usual parametric rate and illustrate its attractive power properties via simulations. We also extend our proposal to test parametric or semiparametric single-index-type models.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2023

What's Trending in Difference-in-Differences? A Synthesis of the Recent Econometrics Literature

This paper synthesizes recent advances in the econometrics of difference-in-differences (DiD) and provides concrete recommendations for practitioners. We begin by articulating a simple set of ``canonical'' assumptions under which the econometrics of DiD are well-understood. We then argue that recent advances in DiD methods can be broadly classified as relaxing some components of the canonical DiD setup, with a focus on $(i)$ multiple periods and variation in treatment timing, $(ii)$ potential violations of parallel trends, or $(iii)$ alternative frameworks for inference. Our discussion highlights the different ways that the DiD literature has advanced beyond the canonical model, and helps to clarify when each of the papers will be relevant for empirical work. We conclude by discussing some promising areas for future research.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2022

When Is Parallel Trends Sensitive to Functional Form?

This paper assesses when the validity of difference-in-differences depends on functional form. We provide a novel characterization: the parallel trends assumption holds under all strictly monotonic transformations of the outcome if and only if a stronger ``parallel trends''-type condition holds for the cumulative distribution function of untreated potential outcomes. This condition for parallel trends to be insensitive to functional form is satisfied if and essentially only if the population can be partitioned into a subgroup for which treatment is effectively randomly assigned and a remaining subgroup for which the distribution of untreated potential outcomes is stable over time. These conditions have testable implications, and we introduce falsification tests for the null that parallel trends is insensitive to functional form.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2021

Distribution Regression in Duration Analysis: an Application to Unemployment Spells

This article proposes inference procedures for distribution regression models in duration analysis using randomly right-censored data. This generalizes classical duration models by allowing situations where explanatory variables' marginal effects freely vary with duration time. The article discusses applications to testing uniform restrictions on the varying coefficients, inferences on average marginal effects, and others involving conditional distribution estimates. Finite sample properties of the proposed method are studied by means of Monte Carlo experiments. Finally, we apply our proposal to study the effects of unemployment benefits on unemployment duration.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2020

Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods

In this article, we consider identification, estimation, and inference procedures for treatment effect parameters using Difference-in-Differences (DiD) with (i) multiple time periods, (ii) variation in treatment timing, and (iii) when the "parallel trends assumption" holds potentially only after conditioning on observed covariates. We show that a family of causal effect parameters are identified in staggered DiD setups, even if differences in observed characteristics create non-parallel outcome dynamics between groups. Our identification results allow one to use outcome regression, inverse probability weighting, or doubly-robust estimands. We also propose different aggregation schemes that can be used to highlight treatment effect heterogeneity across different dimensions as well as to summarize the overall effect of participating in the treatment. We establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators and prove the validity of a computationally convenient bootstrap procedure to conduct asymptotically valid simultaneous (instead of pointwise) inference. Finally, we illustrate the relevance of our proposed tools by analyzing the effect of the minimum wage on teen employment from 2001--2007. Open-source software is available for implementing the proposed methods.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2020

The role of parallel trends in event study settings: An application to environmental economics

Difference-in-Differences (DID) research designs usually rely on variation of treatment timing such that, after making an appropriate parallel trends assumption, one can identify, estimate, and make inference about causal effects. In practice, however, different DID procedures rely on different parallel trends assumptions (PTA), and recover different causal parameters. In this paper, we focus on staggered DID (also referred as event-studies) and discuss the role played by the PTA in terms of identification and estimation of causal parameters. We document a ``robustness'' vs. ``efficiency'' trade-off in terms of the strength of the underlying PTA, and argue that practitioners should be explicit about these trade-offs whenever using DID procedures. We propose new DID estimators that reflect these trade-offs and derived their large sample properties. We illustrate the practical relevance of these results by assessing whether the transition from federal to state management of the Clean Water Act affects compliance rates.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2020

Doubly Robust Difference-in-Differences Estimators

This article proposes doubly robust estimators for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) in difference-in-differences (DID) research designs. In contrast to alternative DID estimators, the proposed estimators are consistent if either (but not necessarily both) a propensity score or outcome regression working models are correctly specified. We also derive the semiparametric efficiency bound for the ATT in DID designs when either panel or repeated cross-section data are available, and show that our proposed estimators attain the semiparametric efficiency bound when the working models are correctly specified. Furthermore, we quantify the potential efficiency gains of having access to panel data instead of repeated cross-section data. Finally, by paying articular attention to the estimation method used to estimate the nuisance parameters, we show that one can sometimes construct doubly robust DID estimators for the ATT that are also doubly robust for inference. Simulation studies and an empirical application illustrate the desirable finite-sample performance of the proposed estimators. Open-source software for implementing the proposed policy evaluation tools is available.

econ.EM↗