Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Peizhu Qian

Publications and source records attributed to Peizhu Qian.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Look as You Leap: Planning Simultaneous Motion and Perception for High-DOF Robots

Most common tasks for robots in dynamic spaces require that the environment is regularly and actively perceived. The perception task considered in this work can represent a broad range of robot perception objectives, including object detection, human activity recognition, and human face detection. For example, a service robot may need to continuously localize an object during manipulation, while an assistive robot may need to reliably perceive a human face or activity for interaction and safety. These tasks impose perception constraints on robot motion. However, solving motion and perception tasks simultaneously is challenging, as their requirements often conflict. Furthermore, robots must react quickly to environmental changes, while directly evaluating perception quality (e.g., object detection confidence) is often expensive or infeasible at runtime. This problem is especially important in human-centered environments, such as homes and hospitals, where effective perception is essential for safe operation. In this work, we address motion planning for high-degree-of-freedom (DoF) robots from a start to a goal configuration with continuous perception constraints in static and dynamic environments. Our solution is a GPU-parallelized perception-score-guided probabilistic roadmap planner with a neural surrogate model (PS-PRM). Unlike existing active perception-, visibility-aware, or learning-based planners, our work jointly considers perception tasks and constraints when searching for a motion-planning solution. Our method uses a neural surrogate model to approximate perception scores, incorporates them into roadmap planning, and leverages GPU parallelism for efficient online replanning. We demonstrate that our planner outperforms RL- and trajectory-optimization-based baselines in static and dynamic environments in simulation and real-robot experiments.

cs.RO↗

I-CEE: Tailoring Explanations of Image Classification Models to User Expertise

Effectively explaining decisions of black-box machine learning models is critical to responsible deployment of AI systems that rely on them. Recognizing their importance, the field of explainable AI (XAI) provides several techniques to generate these explanations. Yet, there is relatively little emphasis on the user (the explainee) in this growing body of work and most XAI techniques generate "one-size-fits-all" explanations. To bridge this gap and achieve a step closer towards human-centered XAI, we present I-CEE, a framework that provides Image Classification Explanations tailored to User Expertise. Informed by existing work, I-CEE explains the decisions of image classification models by providing the user with an informative subset of training data (i.e., example images), corresponding local explanations, and model decisions. However, unlike prior work, I-CEE models the informativeness of the example images to depend on user expertise, resulting in different examples for different users. We posit that by tailoring the example set to user expertise, I-CEE can better facilitate users' understanding and simulatability of the model. To evaluate our approach, we conduct detailed experiments in both simulation and with human participants (N = 100) on multiple datasets. Experiments with simulated users show that I-CEE improves users' ability to accurately predict the model's decisions (simulatability) compared to baselines, providing promising preliminary results. Experiments with human participants demonstrate that our method significantly improves user simulatability accuracy, highlighting the importance of human-centered XAI

cs.AI↗

Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations

Explainable AI (XAI) is widely viewed as a sine qua non for ever-expanding AI research. A better understanding of the needs of XAI users, as well as human-centered evaluations of explainable models are both a necessity and a challenge. In this paper, we explore how HCI and AI researchers conduct user studies in XAI applications based on a systematic literature review. After identifying and thoroughly analyzing 97core papers with human-based XAI evaluations over the past five years, we categorize them along the measured characteristics of explanatory methods, namely trust, understanding, usability, and human-AI collaboration performance. Our research shows that XAI is spreading more rapidly in certain application domains, such as recommender systems than in others, but that user evaluations are still rather sparse and incorporate hardly any insights from cognitive or social sciences. Based on a comprehensive discussion of best practices, i.e., common models, design choices, and measures in user studies, we propose practical guidelines on designing and conducting user studies for XAI researchers and practitioners. Lastly, this survey also highlights several open research directions, particularly linking psychological science and human-centered XAI.

cs.AI↗