Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Pengyu Qian

Publications and source records attributed to Pengyu Qian.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Availability is all you need: achieving optimal regret with minimal information for dynamic matching

We study a centralized discrete-time dynamic two-way matching model with finitely many agent types. Agents arrive stochastically over time and join their type-dedicated queues waiting to be matched. We focus on availability-based policies that make matching decisions based solely on agent availability across types (i.e., whether queues are empty or not), rather than relying on complete queue-length information (e.g., the longest-queue policy). We aim to achieve constant regret at all times with optimal scaling in terms of the general position gap, $ε$, which measures the distance of the fluid relaxation from degeneracy. We classify availability-based policies into global and local policies based on the scope of information they utilize. First, for general networks (possibly cyclic), we propose a global availability-based policy, probabilistic matching, and prove that it achieves the optimal all-time regret scaling of $O(ε^{-1})$, matching the known lower bound established by [KAG24]. Second, for acyclic networks, we focus on the class of local availability-based policies, specifically static priority policies that prioritize matches based on a fixed order. Within this class, we derive the first explicit regret bound for the previously proposed tree priority policy, showing all-time regret scaling of $O(ε^{-(d+1)/2})$, where $d$ is the network depth. Next, we introduce a new truncated tree priority policy and prove that it is the first static priority policy to achieve the optimal all-time regret scaling of $O(ε^{-1})$. These policies are appealing for matching systems such as queueing and load balancing; they reduce operational costs by using minimal information while effectively balancing the trade-off between immediate and future rewards.

cs.DS↗

The Competition for Partners in Matching Markets

We study the competition for partners in two-sided matching markets with heterogeneous agent preferences, with a focus on how the equilibrium outcomes depend on the connectivity in the market. We model random partially connected markets, with each agent having an average degree $d$ in a random (undirected) graph, and a uniformly random preference ranking over their neighbors in the graph. We formally characterize stable matchings in large markets random with small imbalance and find a threshold in the connectivity $d$ at $\log^2 n$ (where $n$ is the number of agents on one side of the market) which separates a ``weak competition'' regime, where agents on both sides of the market do equally well, from a ``strong competition'' regime, where agents on the short (long) side of the market enjoy a significant advantage (disadvantage). Numerical simulations confirm and sharpen our theoretical predictions, and demonstrate robustness to our assumptions. We leverage our characterizations in two ways: First, we derive prescriptive insights into how to design the connectivity of the market to trade off optimally between the average agent welfare achieved and the number of agents who remain unmatched in the market. For most market primitives, we find that the optimal connectivity should lie in the weak competition regime or at the threshold between the regimes. Second, our analysis uncovers a new conceptual principle governing whether the short side enjoys a significant advantage in a given matching market, which can moreover be applied as a diagnostic tool given only basic summary statistics for the market. Counterfactual analyses using data on centralized high school admissions in a major USA city show the practical value of both our design insights and our diagnostic principle.

cs.GT↗

Large Deviations Optimal Scheduling of Closed Queueing Networks

We study the design of dynamic scheduling controls in closed queueing networks with a fixed number of jobs. Each time a server becomes available, the controller has (limited) flexibility in choosing the buffer from which to serve a job. If no jobs are available at any compatible buffer, the server idles. If the job is served, it relocates to a ``destination'' buffer. We study how to maximize throughput in steady state via a large deviations analysis. We propose a family of simple state-dependent policies called Scaled MaxWeight (SMW) policies that dynamically manage the distribution of jobs in the network. We prove that under a complete resource pooling condition (analogous to the condition in Hall's marriage theorem), any SMW policy leads to exponential decay of throughput-loss probability as the number of jobs scales to infinity. Further, there is an SMW policy that achieves the optimal loss exponent among all scheduling policies, and we analytically specify this policy in terms of the service rates and routing probabilities. The optimal SMW policy maintains high job levels adjacent to structurally under-supplied servers. Our methodology also applies to the open network setting and leads to exponent-optimal policies.

math.PR↗

Blind Dynamic Resource Allocation in Closed Networks via Mirror Backpressure

We study the problem of maximizing payoff generated over a period of time in a general class of closed queueing networks with a finite, fixed number of supply units which circulate in the system. Demand arrives stochastically, and serving a demand unit (customer) causes a supply unit to relocate from the ``origin'' to the ``destination'' of the customer. The key challenge is to manage the distribution of supply in the network. We consider general controls including customer entry control, pricing, and assignment. Motivating applications include shared transportation platforms and scrip systems. Inspired by the mirror descent algorithm for optimization and the backpressure policy for network control, we introduce a rich family of \emph{Mirror Backpressure} (MBP) control policies. The MBP policies are simple and practical, and crucially do not need any statistical knowledge of the demand (customer) arrival rates (these rates are permitted to vary in time). Under mild conditions, we propose MBP policies that are provably near optimal. Specifically, our policies lose at most $O(\frac{K}{T}+\frac{1}{K} + \sqrt{ηK})$ payoff per customer relative to the optimal policy that knows the demand arrival rates, where $K$ is the number of supply units, $T$ is the total number of customers over the time horizon, and $η$ is the demand process' average rate of change per customer arrival. An adaptation of MBP is found to perform well in numerical experiments based on data from ride-hailing.

math.OC↗

A Composite Risk Measure Framework for Decision Making under Uncertainty

In this paper, we present a unified framework for decision making under uncertainty. Our framework is based on the composite of two risk measures, where the inner risk measure accounts for the risk of decision given the exact distribution of uncertain model parameters, and the outer risk measure quantifies the risk that occurs when estimating the parameters of distribution. We show that the model is tractable under mild conditions. The framework is a generalization of several existing models, including stochastic programming, robust optimization, distributionally robust optimization, etc. Using this framework, we study a few new models which imply probabilistic guarantees for solutions and yield less conservative results comparing to traditional models. Numerical experiments are performed on portfolio selection problems to demonstrate the strength of our models.

math.OC↗