Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Pengyu Zhu

Publications and source records attributed to Pengyu Zhu.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

How does spatial structure affect psychological restoration? A method based on Graph Neural Networks and Street View Imagery

The Attention Restoration Theory (ART) presents a theoretical framework with four essential indicators (being away, extent, fascinating, and compatibility) for comprehending urban and natural restoration quality. However, previous studies relied on non-sequential data and non-spatial dependent methods, which overlooks the impact of spatial structure defined here as the positional relationships between scene entities on restoration quality. The past methods also make it challenging to measure restoration quality on an urban scale. In this work, a spatial-dependent graph neural networks (GNNs) approach is proposed to reveal the relation between spatial structure and restoration quality on an urban scale. Specifically, we constructed two different types of graphs at the street and city levels. The street-level graphs, using sequential street view images (SVIs) of road segments to capture position relationships between entities, were used to represent spatial structure. The city-level graph, modeling the topological relationships of roads as non-Euclidean data structures and embedding urban features (including Perception-features, Spatial-features, and Socioeconomic-features), was used to measure restoration quality. The results demonstrate that: 1) spatial-dependent GNNs model outperforms traditional methods (Acc = 0.735, F1 = 0.732); 2) spatial structure portrayed through sequential SVIs data significantly influences restoration quality; 3) spaces with the same restoration quality exhibited distinct spatial structures patterns. This study clarifies the association between spatial structure and restoration quality, providing a new perspective to improve urban well-being in the future.

cs.CV↗

A quantitative approach to choose among multiple mutually exclusive decisions: comparative expected utility theory

Mutually exclusive decisions have been studied for decades. Many well-known decision theories have been defined to help people either to make rational decisions or to interpret people's behaviors, such as expected utility theory, regret theory, prospect theory, and so on. The paper argues that none of these decision theories are designed to provide practical, normative and quantitative approaches for multiple mutually exclusive decisions. Different decision-makers should naturally make different choices for the same decision question, as they have different understandings and feelings on the same possible outcomes.The author tries to capture the different understandings and feelings from different decision-makers, and model them into a quantitative decision evaluation process, which everyone could benefit from. The basic elements in classic expected utility theory are kept in the new decision theory, but the influences from mutually exclusive decisions will also be modeled into the evaluation process. This may sound like regret theory, but the new approach is designed to fit multiple mutually exclusive decision scenarios, and it does not require a definition of probability weighting function. The new theory is designed to be simple and straightforward to use, and the results are expected to be rational for each decision-maker.

econ.GN↗