arXiv subjects

Pengzhan Jin

Publications and source records attributed to Pengzhan Jin.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2020

SympNets: Intrinsic structure-preserving symplectic networks for identifying Hamiltonian systems

We propose new symplectic networks (SympNets) for identifying Hamiltonian systems from data based on a composition of linear, activation and gradient modules. In particular, we define two classes of SympNets: the LA-SympNets composed of linear and activation modules, and the G-SympNets composed of gradient modules. Correspondingly, we prove two new universal approximation theorems that demonstrate that SympNets can approximate arbitrary symplectic maps based on appropriate activation functions. We then perform several experiments including the pendulum, double pendulum and three-body problems to investigate the expressivity and the generalization ability of SympNets. The simulation results show that even very small size SympNets can generalize well, and are able to handle both separable and non-separable Hamiltonian systems with data points resulting from short or long time steps. In all the test cases, SympNets outperform the baseline models, and are much faster in training and prediction. We also develop an extended version of SympNets to learn the dynamics from irregularly sampled data. This extended version of SympNets can be thought of as a universal model representing the solution to an arbitrary Hamiltonian system.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Quantifying the generalization error in deep learning in terms of data distribution and neural network smoothness

The accuracy of deep learning, i.e., deep neural networks, can be characterized by dividing the total error into three main types: approximation error, optimization error, and generalization error. Whereas there are some satisfactory answers to the problems of approximation and optimization, much less is known about the theory of generalization. Most existing theoretical works for generalization fail to explain the performance of neural networks in practice. To derive a meaningful bound, we study the generalization error of neural networks for classification problems in terms of data distribution and neural network smoothness. We introduce the cover complexity (CC) to measure the difficulty of learning a data set and the inverse of the modulus of continuity to quantify neural network smoothness. A quantitative bound for expected accuracy/error is derived by considering both the CC and neural network smoothness. Although most of the analysis is general and not specific to neural networks, we validate our theoretical assumptions and results numerically for neural networks by several data sets of images. The numerical results confirm that the expected error of trained networks scaled with the square root of the number of classes has a linear relationship with respect to the CC. We also observe a clear consistency between test loss and neural network smoothness during the training process. In addition, we demonstrate empirically that the neural network smoothness decreases when the network size increases whereas the smoothness is insensitive to training dataset size.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2020

Deep Hamiltonian networks based on symplectic integrators

HNets is a class of neural networks on grounds of physical prior for learning Hamiltonian systems. This paper explains the influences of different integrators as hyper-parameters on the HNets through error analysis. If we define the network target as the map with zero empirical loss on arbitrary training data, then the non-symplectic integrators cannot guarantee the existence of the network targets of HNets. We introduce the inverse modified equations for HNets and prove that the HNets based on symplectic integrators possess network targets and the differences between the network targets and the original Hamiltonians depend on the accuracy orders of the integrators. Our numerical experiments show that the phase flows of the Hamiltonian systems obtained by symplectic HNets do not exactly preserve the original Hamiltonians, but preserve the network targets calculated; the loss of the network target for the training data and the test data is much less than the loss of the original Hamiltonian; the symplectic HNets have more powerful generalization ability and higher accuracy than the non-symplectic HNets in addressing predicting issues. Thus, the symplectic integrators are of critical importance for HNets.

math.NA↗

arXiv2020

DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators

While it is widely known that neural networks are universal approximators of continuous functions, a less known and perhaps more powerful result is that a neural network with a single hidden layer can approximate accurately any nonlinear continuous operator. This universal approximation theorem is suggestive of the potential application of neural networks in learning nonlinear operators from data. However, the theorem guarantees only a small approximation error for a sufficient large network, and does not consider the important optimization and generalization errors. To realize this theorem in practice, we propose deep operator networks (DeepONets) to learn operators accurately and efficiently from a relatively small dataset. A DeepONet consists of two sub-networks, one for encoding the input function at a fixed number of sensors $x_i, i=1,\dots,m$ (branch net), and another for encoding the locations for the output functions (trunk net). We perform systematic simulations for identifying two types of operators, i.e., dynamic systems and partial differential equations, and demonstrate that DeepONet significantly reduces the generalization error compared to the fully-connected networks. We also derive theoretically the dependence of the approximation error in terms of the number of sensors (where the input function is defined) as well as the input function type, and we verify the theorem with computational results. More importantly, we observe high-order error convergence in our computational tests, namely polynomial rates (from half order to fourth order) and even exponential convergence with respect to the training dataset size.

cs.LG↗