arXiv subjects

Peter Faymonville

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Faymonville.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

The Reactive Synthesis Competition (SYNTCOMP): 2018-2021

We report on the last four editions of the reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP 2018-2021). We briefly describe the evaluation scheme and the experimental setup of SYNTCOMP. Then, we introduce new benchmark classes that have been added to the SYNTCOMP library and give an overview of the participants of SYNTCOMP. Finally, we present and analyze the results of our experimental evaluations, including a ranking of tools with respect to quantity and quality - that is, the total size in terms of logic and memory elements - of solutions.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2019

Real-time Stream-based Monitoring

We introduce RTLola, a new stream-based specification language for the description of real-time properties of reactive systems. The key feature is the integration of sliding windows over real-time intervals with aggregation functions into the language. Using sliding windows we can detach fixed-rate output streams from the varying rate input streams. We provide an efficient evaluation algorithm of the sliding windows by partitioning the windows into intervals according to a given monitor frequency. For useful aggregation functions, the intervals allow a more efficient way to compute the aggregation value by dynamically reusing interval summaries. In general, the number of input values within a single window instance can grow arbitrarily large disallowing any guarantees on the expected memory consumption. Assuming a fixed monitor output rate, we can provide memory guarantees which can be computed a-priori. Additionally, for specifications using certain classes of aggregation functions, we can perform a more precise, better memory analysis. We demonstrate the applicability of the new language on practical examples.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2019

The 5th Reactive Synthesis Competition (SYNTCOMP 2018): Benchmarks, Participants & Results

We report on the fifth reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP 2018). We introduce four new benchmark classes that have been added to the SYNTCOMP library, and briefly describe the evaluation scheme and the experimental setup of SYNTCOMP 2018. We give an overview of the participants of SYNTCOMP 2018 and highlight changes compared to previous years. Finally, we present and analyze the results of our experimental evaluation, including a ranking of tools with respect to quantity and quality of solutions.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

Stream Runtime Monitoring on UAS

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) with autonomous decision-making capabilities are of increasing interest for a wide area of applications such as logistics and disaster recovery. In order to ensure the correct behavior of the system and to recognize hazardous situations or system faults, we applied stream runtime monitoring techniques within the DLR ARTIS (Autonomous Research Testbed for Intelligent System) family of unmanned aircraft. We present our experience from specification elicitation, instrumentation, offline log-file analysis, and online monitoring on the flight computer on a test rig. The debugging and health management support through stream runtime monitoring techniques have proven highly beneficial for system design and development. At the same time, the project has identified usability improvements to the specification language, and has influenced the design of the language.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2018

BoSy: An Experimentation Framework for Bounded Synthesis

We present BoSy, a reactive synthesis tool based on the bounded synthesis approach. Bounded synthesis ensures the minimality of the synthesized implementation by incrementally increasing a bound on the size of the solutions it considers. For each bound, the existence of a solution is encoded as a logical constraint solving problem that is solved by an appropriate solver. BoSy constructs bounded synthesis encodings into SAT, QBF, DQBF, EPR, and SMT, and interfaces to solvers of the corresponding type. When supported by the solver, BoSy extracts solutions as circuits, which can, if desired, be verified with standard hardware model checkers. BoSy won the LTL synthesis track at SYNTCOMP 2016. In addition to its use as a synthesis tool, BoSy can also be used as an experimentation and performance evaluation framework for various types of satisfiability solvers.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

Encodings of Bounded Synthesis

The reactive synthesis problem is to compute a system satisfying a given specification in temporal logic. Bounded synthesis is the approach to bound the maximum size of the system that we accept as a solution to the reactive synthesis problem. As a result, bounded synthesis is decidable whenever the corresponding verification problem is decidable, and can be applied in settings where classic synthesis fails, such as in the synthesis of distributed systems. In this paper, we study the constraint solving problem behind bounded synthesis. We consider different reductions of the bounded synthesis problem of linear-time temporal logic (LTL) to constraint systems given as boolean formulas (SAT), quantified boolean formulas (QBF), and dependency quantified boolean formulas (DQBF). The reductions represent different trade-offs between conciseness and algorithmic efficiency. In the SAT encoding, both inputs and states of the system are represented explicitly; in QBF, inputs are symbolic and states are explicit; in DQBF, both inputs and states are symbolic. We evaluate the encodings systematically using benchmarks from the reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP) and state-of-the-art solvers. Our key, and perhaps surprising, empirical finding is that QBF clearly dominates both SAT and DQBF.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2017

The 4th Reactive Synthesis Competition (SYNTCOMP 2017): Benchmarks, Participants & Results

We report on the fourth reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP 2017). We introduce two new benchmark classes that have been added to the SYNTCOMP library, and briefly describe the benchmark selection, evaluation scheme and the experimental setup of SYNTCOMP 2017. We present the participants of SYNTCOMP 2017, with a focus on changes with respect to the previous years and on the two completely new tools that have entered the competition. Finally, we present and analyze the results of our experimental evaluation, including a ranking of tools with respect to quantity and quality of solutions.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2015

Parametric Linear Dynamic Logic (full version)

We introduce Parametric Linear Dynamic Logic (PLDL), which extends Linear Dynamic Logic (LDL) by temporal operators equipped with parameters that bound their scope. LDL itself was proposed as an extension of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) that is able to express all omega-regular specifications while still maintaining many of LTL's desirable properties like intuitive syntax and semantics and a translation into non-deterministic Büchi automata of exponential size. But LDL lacks capabilities to express timing constraints. By adding parameterized operators to LDL, we obtain a logic that is able to express all omega-regular properties and that subsumes parameterized extensions of LTL like Parametric LTL and PROMPT-LTL. Our main technical contribution is a translation of PLDL formulas into non-deterministic Büchi automata of exponential size via alternating automata. This yields polynomial space algorithms for model checking and assume-guarantee model checking and a realizability algorithm with doubly-exponential running time. All three problems are also shown to be complete for these complexity classes. Moreover, we give tight upper and lower bounds on optimal parameter values for model checking and realizability. Using these bounds, we present a polynomial space procedure for model checking optimization and an algorithm with triply-exponential running time for realizability optimization. Our results show that PLDL model checking and realizability are no harder than their respective (parametric) LTL counterparts.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2014

Parametric Linear Dynamic Logic

We introduce Parametric Linear Dynamic Logic (PLDL), which extends Linear Dynamic Logic (LDL) by temporal operators equipped with parameters that bound their scope. LDL was proposed as an extension of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) that is able to express all $ω$-regular specifications while still maintaining many of LTL's desirable properties like an intuitive syntax and a translation into non-deterministic Büchi automata of exponential size. But LDL lacks capabilities to express timing constraints. By adding parameterized operators to LDL, we obtain a logic that is able to express all $ω$-regular properties and that subsumes parameterized extensions of LTL like Parametric LTL and PROMPT-LTL. Our main technical contribution is a translation of PLDL formulas into non-deterministic Büchi word automata of exponential size via alternating automata. This yields a PSPACE model checking algorithm and a realizability algorithm with doubly-exponential running time. Furthermore, we give tight upper and lower bounds on optimal parameter values for both problems. These results show that PLDL model checking and realizability are not harder than LTL model checking and realizability.

cs.LO↗