arXiv subjects

Petr A. Golovach

Publications and source records attributed to Petr A. Golovach.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2025

When does FTP become FPT?

In the problem Fault-Tolerant Path (FTP), we are given an edge-weighted directed graph G = (V, E), a subset U \subseteq E of vulnerable edges, two vertices s, t \in V, and integers k and \ell. The task is to decide whether there exists a subgraph H of G with total cost at most \ell such that, after the removal of any k vulnerable edges, H still contains an s-t-path. We study whether Fault-Tolerant Path is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) and whether it admits a polynomial kernel under various parameterizations. Our choices of parameters include: the number of vulnerable edges in the input graph, the number of safe (i.e, invulnerable) edges in the input graph, the budget \ell, the minimum number of safe edges in any optimal solution, the minimum number of vulnerable edges in any optimal solution, the required redundancy k, and natural above- and below-guarantee parameterizations. We provide an almost complete description of the complexity landscape of FTP for these parameters.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Tight Approximation and Kernelization Bounds for Vertex-Disjoint Shortest Paths

We examine the possibility of approximating Maximum Vertex-Disjoint Shortest Paths. In this problem, the input is an edge-weighted (directed or undirected) $n$-vertex graph $G$ along with $k$ terminal pairs $(s_1,t_1),(s_2,t_2),\ldots,(s_k,t_k)$. The task is to connect as many terminal pairs as possible by pairwise vertex-disjoint paths such that each path is a shortest path between the respective terminals. Our work is anchored in the recent breakthrough by Lochet [SODA '21], which demonstrates the polynomial-time solvability of the problem for a fixed value of $k$. Lochet's result implies the existence of a polynomial-time $ck$-approximation for Maximum Vertex-Disjoint Shortest Paths, where $c \leq 1$ is a constant. Our first result suggests that this approximation algorithm is, in a sense, the best we can hope for. More precisely, assuming the gap-ETH, we exclude the existence of an $o(k)$-approximations within $f(k)$poly($n$) time for any function $f$ that only depends on $k$. Our second result demonstrates the infeasibility of achieving an approximation ratio of $n^{\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon}$ in polynomial time, unless P = NP. It is not difficult to show that a greedy algorithm selecting a path with the minimum number of arcs results in a $\sqrt{\ell}$-approximation, where $\ell$ is the number of edges in all the paths of an optimal solution. Since $\ell \leq n$, this underscores the tightness of the $n^{\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon}$-inapproximability bound. Additionally, we establish that the problem can be solved in $2^{O(\ell)}$poly($n$) time, but does not admit a polynomial kernel in $\ell$. Moreover, it cannot be solved in $2^{o(\ell)}$poly($n$) time unless the ETH fails. Our hardness results hold for undirected graphs with unit weights, while our positive results extend to scenarios where the input graph is directed and features arbitrary (non-negative) edge weights.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

When Distances Lie: Euclidean Embeddings in the Presence of Outliers and Distance Violations

Distance geometry explores the properties of distance spaces that can be exactly represented as the pairwise Euclidean distances between points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ ($d \geq 1$), or equivalently, distance spaces that can be isometrically embedded in $\mathbb{R}^d$. In this work, we investigate whether a distance space can be isometrically embedded in $\mathbb{R}^d$ after applying a limited number of modifications. Specifically, we focus on two types of modifications: outlier deletion (removing points) and distance modification (adjusting distances between points). The central problem, Euclidean Embedding Editing (EEE), asks whether an input distance space on $n$ points can be transformed, using at most $k$ modifications, into a space that is isometrically embeddable in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We present several fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) and approximation algorithms for this problem. Our first result is an algorithm that solves EEE in time $(dk)^{\mathcal{O}(d+k)} + n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The core subroutine of this algorithm, which is of independent interest, is a polynomial-time method for compressing the input distance space into an equivalent instance of EEE with $\mathcal{O}((dk)^2)$ points. For the special but important case of EEE where only outlier deletions are allowed, we improve the parameter dependence of the FPT algorithm and obtain a running time of $\min\{(d+3)^k, 2^{d+k}\} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. Additionally, we provide an FPT-approximation algorithm for this problem, which outputs a set of at most $2 \cdot {\rm OPT}$ outliers in time $2^d \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. This 2-approximation algorithm improves upon the previous $(3+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm by Sidiropoulos, Wang, and Wang [SODA '17]. Furthermore, we complement our algorithms with hardness results motivating our choice of parameterizations.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

Multivariate Exploration of Metric Dilation

Let $G$ be a weighted graph embedded in a metric space $(M, d_M )$. The vertices of $G$ correspond to the points in $M$ , with the weight of each edge $uv$ being the distance $d_M (u, v)$ between their respective points in $M$ . The dilation (or stretch) of $G$ is defined as the minimum factor $t$ such that, for any pair of vertices $u, v$, the distance between $u$ and $v$-represented by the weight of a shortest $u$, $v$-path is at most $ t \cdot d_M (u, v)$. We study Dilation t-Augmentation, where the objective is, given a metric $M $, a graph $G$, and numerical values $k$ and $t$, to determine whether $G$ can be transformed into a graph with dilation $t$ by adding at most $k$ edges. Our primary focus is on the scenario where the metric $M$ is the shortest path metric of an unweighted graph $Γ$. Even in this specific case, Dilation $t$-Augmentation remains computationally challenging. In particular, the problem is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$ when $Γ$ is a complete graph, already for $t=2$. Our main contribution lies in providing new insights into the impact of combinations of various parameters on the computational complexity of the problem. We establish the following. -- The parameterized dichotomy of the problem with respect to dilation $t$, when the graph $G$ is sparse: Parameterized by $k$, the problem is FPT for graphs excluding a biclique $K_{d,d}$ as a subgraph for $t\leq 2$ and the problem is W[1]-hard for $t\geq 3$ even if $G$ is a forest consisting of disjoint stars. -- The problem is FPT parameterized by the combined parameter $k+t+Δ$, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree of the graph $G$ or $Γ$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2024

Parameterized Geometric Graph Modification with Disk Scaling

The parameterized analysis of graph modification problems represents the most extensively studied area within Parameterized Complexity. Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k\in\mathbb{N}$ as input, the goal is to determine whether we can perform at most $k$ operations on $G$ to transform it into a graph belonging to a specified graph class $\mathcal{F}$. Typical operations are combinatorial and include vertex deletions and edge deletions, insertions, and contractions. However, in many real-world scenarios, when the input graph is constrained to be a geometric intersection graph, the modification of the graph is influenced by changes in the geometric properties of the underlying objects themselves, rather than by combinatorial modifications. It raises the question of whether vertex deletions or adjacency modifications are necessarily the most appropriate modification operations for studying modifications of geometric graphs. We propose the study of the disk intersection graph modification through the scaling of disks. This operation is typical in the realm of topology control but has not yet been explored in the context of Parameterized Complexity. We design parameterized algorithms and kernels for modifying to the most basic graph classes: edgeless, connected, and acyclic. Our technical contributions encompass a novel combination of linear programming, branching, and kernelization techniques, along with a fresh application of bidimensionality theory to analyze the area covered by disks, which may have broader applicability.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

Packing Short Cycles

Cycle packing is a fundamental problem in optimization, graph theory, and algorithms. Motivated by recent advancements in finding vertex-disjoint paths between a specified set of vertices that either minimize the total length of the paths [Björklund, Husfeldt, ICALP 2014; Mari, Mukherjee, Pilipczuk, and Sankowski, SODA 2024] or request the paths to be shortest [Lochet, SODA 2021], we consider the following cycle packing problems: Min-Sum Cycle Packing and Shortest Cycle Packing. In Min-Sum Cycle Packing, we try to find, in a weighted undirected graph, $k$ vertex-disjoint cycles of minimum total weight. Our first main result is an algorithm that, for any fixed $k$, solves the problem in polynomial time. We complement this result by establishing the W[1]-hardness of Min-Sum Cycle Packing parameterized by $k$. The same results hold for the version of the problem where the task is to find $k$ edge-disjoint cycles. Our second main result concerns Shortest Cycle Packing, which is a special case of Min-Sum Cycle Packing that asks to find a packing of $k$ shortest cycles in a graph. We prove this problem to be fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by $k$ on weighted planar graphs. We also obtain a polynomial kernel for the edge-disjoint variant of the problem on planar graphs. Deciding whether Min-Sum Cycle Packing is FPT on planar graphs and whether Shortest Cycle Packing is FPT on general graphs remain challenging open questions.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Fixed-Parameter Tractability of Hedge Cut

In the Hedge Cut problem, the edges of a graph are partitioned into groups called hedges, and the question is what is the minimum number of hedges to delete to disconnect the graph. Ghaffari, Karger, and Panigrahi [SODA 2017] showed that Hedge Cut can be solved in quasipolynomial-time, raising the hope for a polynomial time algorithm. Jaffke, Lima, Masarík, Pilipczuk, and Souza [SODA 2023] complemented this result by showing that assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), no polynomial-time algorithm exists. In this paper, we show that Hedge Cut is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the solution size $\ell$ by providing an algorithm with running time $\binom{O(\log n) + \ell}{\ell} \cdot m^{O(1)}$, which can be upper bounded by $c^{\ell} \cdot (n+m)^{O(1)}$ for any constant $c>1$. This running time captures at the same time the fact that the problem is quasipolynomial-time solvable, and that it is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $\ell$. We further generalize this algorithm to an algorithm with running time $\binom{O(k \log n) + \ell}{\ell} \cdot n^{O(k)} \cdot m^{O(1)}$ for Hedge $k$-Cut.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

How to guide a present-biased agent through prescribed tasks?

The present bias is a well-documented behavioral trait that significantly influences human decision-making, with present-biased agents often prioritizing immediate rewards over long-term benefits, leading to suboptimal outcomes in various real-world scenarios. Kleinberg and Oren (2014) proposed a popular graph-theoretical model of inconsistent planning to capture the behavior of present-biased agents. In this model, a multi-step project is represented by a weighted directed acyclic task graph, where the agent traverses the graph based on present-biased preferences. We use the model of Kleinberg and Oren to address the principal-agent problem, where a principal, fully aware of the agent's present bias, aims to modify an existing project by adding or deleting tasks. The challenge is to create a modified project that satisfies two somewhat contradictory conditions. On one hand, the present-biased agent should select specific tasks deemed important by the principal. On the other hand, if the anticipated costs in the modified project become too high for the agent, there is a risk of the agent abandoning the entire project, which is not in the principal's interest. To tackle this issue, we leverage the tools of parameterized complexity to investigate whether the principal's strategy can be efficiently identified. We provide algorithms and complexity bounds for this problem.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Hybrid k-Clustering: Blending k-Median and k-Center

We propose a novel clustering model encompassing two well-known clustering models: k-center clustering and k-median clustering. In the Hybrid k-Clusetring problem, given a set P of points in R^d, an integer k, and a non-negative real r, our objective is to position k closed balls of radius r to minimize the sum of distances from points not covered by the balls to their closest balls. Equivalently, we seek an optimal L_1-fitting of a union of k balls of radius r to a set of points in the Euclidean space. When r=0, this corresponds to k-median; when the minimum sum is zero, indicating complete coverage of all points, it is k-center. Our primary result is a bicriteria approximation algorithm that, for a given ε>0, produces a hybrid k-clustering with balls of radius (1+ε)r. This algorithm achieves a cost at most 1+εof the optimum, and it operates in time 2^{(kd/ε)^{O(1)}} n^{O(1)}. Notably, considering the established lower bounds on k-center and k-median, our bicriteria approximation stands as the best possible result for Hybrid k-Clusetring.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Cuts in Graphs with Matroid Constraints

{\sc Vertex $(s, t)$-Cut} and {\sc Vertex Multiway Cut} are two fundamental graph separation problems in algorithmic graph theory. We study matroidal generalizations of these problems, where in addition to the usual input, we are given a representation $R \in \mathbb{F}^{r \times n}$ of a linear matroid $\mathcal{M} = (V(G), \mathcal{I})$ of rank $r$ in the input, and the goal is to determine whether there exists a vertex subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ that has the required cut properties, as well as is independent in the matroid $\mathcal{M}$. We refer to these problems as {\sc Independent Vertex $(s, t)$-cut}, and {\sc Independent Multiway Cut}, respectively. We show that these problems are fixed-parameter tractable ({\sf FPT}) when parameterized by the solution size (which can be assumed to be equal to the rank of the matroid $\mathcal{M}$). These results are obtained by exploiting the recent technique of flow augmentation [Kim et al.~STOC '22], combined with a dynamic programming algorithm on flow-paths á la [Feige and Mahdian,~STOC '06] that maintains a representative family of solutions w.r.t.~the given matroid [Marx, TCS '06; Fomin et al., JACM]. As a corollary, we also obtain {\sf FPT} algorithms for the independent version of {\sc Odd Cycle Transversal}. Further, our results can be generalized to other variants of the problems, e.g., weighted versions, or edge-deletion versions.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2024

Algorithmic Extensions of Dirac's Theorem

In 1952, Dirac proved the following theorem about long cycles in graphs with large minimum vertex degrees: Every $n$-vertex $2$-connected graph $G$ with minimum vertex degree $δ\geq 2$ contains a cycle with at least $\min\{2δ,n\}$ vertices. In particular, if $δ\geq n/2$, then $G$ is Hamiltonian. The proof of Dirac's theorem is constructive, and it yields an algorithm computing the corresponding cycle in polynomial time. The combinatorial bound of Dirac's theorem is tight in the following sense. There are 2-connected graphs that do not contain cycles of length more than $2δ+1$. Also, there are non-Hamiltonian graphs with all vertices but one of degree at least $n/2$. This prompts naturally to the following algorithmic questions. For $k\geq 1$, (A) How difficult is to decide whether a 2-connected graph contains a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+k,n\}$? (B) How difficult is to decide whether a graph $G$ is Hamiltonian, when at least $n - k$ vertices of $G$ are of degrees at least $n/2-k$? The first question was asked by Fomin, Golovach, Lokshtanov, Panolan, Saurabh, and Zehavi. The second question is due to Jansen, Kozma, and Nederlof. Even for a very special case of $k=1$, the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm deciding whether $G$ contains a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+1,n\}$ was open. We resolve both questions by proving the following algorithmic generalization of Dirac's theorem: If all but $k$ vertices of a $2$-connected graph $G$ are of degree at least $δ$, then deciding whether $G$ has a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+k, n\}$ can be done in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The proof of the algorithmic generalization of Dirac's theorem builds on new graph-theoretical results that are interesting on their own.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Stability in Graphs with Matroid Constraints

We study the following Independent Stable Set problem. Let G be an undirected graph and M = (V(G),I) be a matroid whose elements are the vertices of G. For an integer k\geq 1, the task is to decide whether G contains a set S\subseteq V(G) of size at least k which is independent (stable) in G and independent in M. This problem generalizes several well-studied algorithmic problems, including Rainbow Independent Set, Rainbow Matching, and Bipartite Matching with Separation. We show that - When the matroid M is represented by the independence oracle, then for any computable function f, no algorithm can solve Independent Stable Set using f(k)n^{o(k)} calls to the oracle. - On the other hand, when the graph G is of degeneracy d, then the problem is solvable in time O((d+1)^kn), and hence is FPT parameterized by d+k. Moreover, when the degeneracy d is a constant (which is not a part of the input), the problem admits a kernel polynomial in k. More precisely, we prove that for every integer d\geq 0, the problem admits a kernelization algorithm that in time n^{O(d)} outputs an equivalent framework with a graph on dk^{O(d)} vertices. A lower bound complements this when d is part of the input: Independent Stable Set does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by k+d unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly. This lower bound holds even when M is a partition matroid. - Another set of results concerns the scenario when the graph G is chordal. In this case, our computational lower bound excludes an FPT algorithm when the input matroid is given by its independence oracle. However, we demonstrate that Independent Stable Set can be solved in 2^{O(k)}||M||^{O(1)} time when M is a linear matroid given by its representation. In the same setting, Independent Stable Set does not have a polynomial kernel when parameterized by k unless NP\subseteq coNP/poly.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Model-Checking for First-Order Logic with Disjoint Paths Predicates in Proper Minor-Closed Graph Classes

The disjoint paths logic, FOL+DP, is an extension of First-Order Logic (FOL) with the extra atomic predicate $\mathsf{dp}_k(x_1,y_1,\ldots,x_k,y_k),$ expressing the existence of internally vertex-disjoint paths between $x_i$ and $y_i,$ for $i\in\{1,\ldots, k\}$. This logic can express a wide variety of problems that escape the expressibility potential of FOL. We prove that for every proper minor-closed graph class, model-checking for FOL+DP can be done in quadratic time. We also introduce an extension of FOL+DP, namely the scattered disjoint paths logic, FOL+SDP, where we further consider the atomic predicate $s{\sf -sdp}_k(x_1,y_1,\ldots,x_k,y_k),$ demanding that the disjoint paths are within distance bigger than some fixed value $s$. Using the same technique we prove that model-checking for FOL+SDP can be done in quadratic time on classes of graphs with bounded Euler genus.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Tree Containment Above Minimum Degree is FPT

According to the classic Chv{á}tal's Lemma from 1977, a graph of minimum degree $δ(G)$ contains every tree on $δ(G)+1$ vertices. Our main result is the following algorithmic "extension" of Chvátal's Lemma: For any $n$-vertex graph $G$, integer $k$, and a tree $T$ on at most $δ(G)+k$ vertices, deciding whether $G$ contains a subgraph isomorphic to $T$, can be done in time $f(k)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ for some function $f$ of $k$ only. The proof of our main result is based on an interplay between extremal graph theory and parameterized algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

FPT Approximation and Subexponential Algorithms for Covering Few or Many Edges

We study the \textsc{$α$-Fixed Cardinality Graph Partitioning ($α$-FCGP)} problem, the generic local graph partitioning problem introduced by Bonnet et al. [Algorithmica 2015]. In this problem, we are given a graph $G$, two numbers $k,p$ and $0\leqα\leq 1$, the question is whether there is a set $S\subseteq V$ of size $k$ with a specified coverage function $cov_α(S)$ at least $p$ (or at most $p$ for the minimization version). The coverage function $cov_α(\cdot)$ counts edges with exactly one endpoint in $S$ with weight $α$ and edges with both endpoints in $S$ with weight $1 - α$. $α$-FCGP generalizes a number of fundamental graph problems such as \textsc{Densest $k$-Subgraph}, \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover}, and \textsc{Max $(k,n-k)$-Cut}. A natural question in the study of $α$-FCGP is whether the algorithmic results known for its special cases, like \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover}, could be extended to more general settings. One of the simple but powerful methods for obtaining parameterized approximation [Manurangsi, SOSA 2019] and subexponential algorithms [Fomin et al. IPL 2011] for \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover} is based on the greedy vertex degree orderings. The main insight of our work is that the idea of greed vertex degree ordering could be used to design fixed-parameter approximation schemes (FPT-AS) for $α> 0$ and the subexponential-time algorithms for the problem on apex-minor free graphs for maximization with $α> 1/3$ and minimization with $α< 1/3$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Parameterized and Approximation Algorithms for the Maximum Bimodal Subgraph Problem

A vertex of a plane digraph is bimodal if all its incoming edges (and hence all its outgoing edges) are consecutive in the cyclic order around it. A plane digraph is bimodal if all its vertices are bimodal. Bimodality is at the heart of many types of graph layouts, such as upward drawings, level-planar drawings, and L-drawings. If the graph is not bimodal, the Maximum Bimodal Subgraph (MBS) problem asks for an embedding-preserving bimodal subgraph with the maximum number of edges. We initiate the study of the MBS problem from the parameterized complexity perspective with two main results: (i) we describe an FPT algorithm parameterized by the branchwidth (and hence by the treewidth) of the graph; (ii) we establish that MBS parameterized by the number of non-bimodal vertices admits a polynomial kernel. As the byproduct of these results, we obtain a subexponential FPT algorithm and an efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme for MBS.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Kernelization for Spreading Points

We consider the following problem about dispersing points. Given a set of points in the plane, the task is to identify whether by moving a small number of points by small distance, we can obtain an arrangement of points such that no pair of points is ``close" to each other. More precisely, for a family of $n$ points, an integer $k$, and a real number $d > 0$, we ask whether at most $k$ points could be relocated, each point at distance at most $d$ from its original location, such that the distance between each pair of points is at least a fixed constant, say $1$. A number of approximation algorithms for variants of this problem, under different names like distant representatives, disk dispersing, or point spreading, are known in the literature. However, to the best of our knowledge, the parameterized complexity of this problem remains widely unexplored. We make the first step in this direction by providing a kernelization algorithm that, in polynomial time, produces an equivalent instance with $O(d^2k^3)$ points. As a byproduct of this result, we also design a non-trivial fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for the problem, parameterized by $k$ and $d$. Finally, we complement the result about polynomial kernelization by showing a lower bound that rules out the existence of a kernel whose size is polynomial in $k$ alone, unless $\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{coNP}/\text{poly}$.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2023

Kernelization for Finding Lineal Topologies (Depth-First Spanning Trees) with Many or Few Leaves

For a given graph $G$, a depth-first search (DFS) tree $T$ of $G$ is an $r$-rooted spanning tree such that every edge of $G$ is either an edge of $T$ or is between a \textit{descendant} and an \textit{ancestor} in $T$. A graph $G$ together with a DFS tree is called a \textit{lineal topology} $\mathcal{T} = (G, r, T)$. Sam et al. (2023) initiated study of the parameterized complexity of the \textsc{Min-LLT} and \textsc{Max-LLT} problems which ask, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k\geq 0$, whether $G$ has a DFS tree with at most $k$ and at least $k$ leaves, respectively. Particularly, they showed that for the dual parameterization, where the tasks are to find DFS trees with at least $n-k$ and at most $n-k$ leaves, respectively, these problems are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $k$. However, the proofs were based on Courcelle's theorem, thereby making the running times a tower of exponentials. We prove that both problems admit polynomial kernels with $\Oh(k^3)$ vertices. In particular, this implies FPT algorithms running in $k^{\Oh(k)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ time. We achieve these results by making use of a $\Oh(k)$-sized vertex cover structure associated with each problem. This also allows us to demonstrate polynomial kernels for \textsc{Min-LLT} and \textsc{Max-LLT} for the structural parameterization by the vertex cover number.

cs.DS↗