arXiv subjects

Petre Lameski

Publications and source records attributed to Petre Lameski.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Towards Practical Precision Agriculture: Real-Time Fruit Detection and Video Analytics on Embedded Edge Hardware

Static-image benchmarks do not capture the computational and temporal requirements of practical orchard video analytics. This study presents an end-to-end framework for real-time fruit detection, tracking, and counting on the NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super. A lightweight YOLO26s detector is trained independently on four public datasets representing apples, mangoes, blueberries, and strawberries under a common protocol. The models are deployed on embedded platform using PyTorch and TensorRT at FP32, FP16, and INT8 precision. APPLE MOTS is then used for temporal video analytics because it provides orchard sequences with persistent fruit identities, enabling evaluation of multi-object tracking and unique-fruit counting. The selected FP16 TensorRT detector is integrated into an NVIDIA DeepStream pipeline combining hardware-accelerated decoding, ByteTrack tracking, and motion-aware line-crossing analytics. Across the four detection tasks, mean test mAP@50:95 ranges from 0.4957 to 0.8656. On the Jetson, TensorRT FP16 achieves 66.76-74.56 images/s at 13.41-14.98 ms prediction latency, while reducing mAP@50:95 by only 0.0020-0.0054 and gross energy consumption by approximately 64-66% relative to PyTorch FP32. The complete detector-tracker-analytics pipeline reaches 44.96-54.11 FPS and sustains the configured 30-FPS input rate without output-frame loss. On held-out orchard video sequences, HOTA ranges from 0.345 to 0.538, event-level counting F1 from 0.611 to 0.803, and relative count error from 6.2% to 51.6%. Performance varies across acquisition geometries: near-lateral row viewing yields the most stable tracking and counting, whereas forward traversal remains association- and recall-limited despite spatially adaptive counting geometry. These results show that practical edge-based fruit monitoring requires efficient detection and acquisition geometries that support reliable temporal association.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

A Dataset-Centric Benchmark of Deep Learning Methods for Grape Leaf Disease Classification and Detection

Grape leaf disease recognition is important for precision agriculture, enabling early diagnosis, timely intervention, and improved vineyard management. Although deep learning has achieved strong results, many studies rely on few datasets, often acquired under controlled conditions, and may not reflect real vineyard challenges such as complex backgrounds, variable illumination, occlusion, leaf pose, disease severity, and device differences. This paper presents a dataset-centric benchmark of deep learning methods for grape leaf disease classification and detection. We analyze publicly available datasets in terms of disease categories, annotation types, acquisition conditions, image characteristics, class distributions, provenance, and task suitability. Representative models are evaluated in three settings: image-level classification, region-level classification, and object detection. Classification is assessed using accuracy, while detection is evaluated using mAP@50 and mAP@50:95. Cross-dataset experiments further examine transfer between datasets with compatible disease categories but different visual and annotation characteristics. Results show near-saturated classification performance on several controlled or derivative datasets, greater difficulty on heterogeneous datasets, and substantial variation in detection performance across annotation settings. Cross-dataset performance drops sharply, especially for object detection, indicating that shared disease labels do not necessarily define equivalent recognition tasks. The benchmark emphasizes dataset provenance, realistic field evaluation, annotation compatibility, and external validation for reliable vineyard disease recognition.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

50 questions on Active Assisted Living technologies. Global edition

This booklet on Active Assisted Living (AAL) technologies has been created as part of the GoodBrother COST Action, which has run from 2020 to 2024. COST Actions are European research programs that promote collaboration across borders, uniting researchers, professionals, and institutions to address key societal challenges. GoodBrother focused on ethical and privacy concerns surrounding video and audio monitoring in care settings. The aim was to ensure that while AAL technologies help older adults and vulnerable individuals, their privacy and data protection rights remain a top priority. This booklet is designed to guide you through the role that AAL technologies play in improving the quality of life for older adults, caregivers, and people with disabilities. AAL technologies offer tools for those facing cognitive or physical challenges. They can enhance independence, assist with daily routines, and promote a safer living environment. However, the rise of these technologies also brings important questions about data protection and user autonomy. This resource is intended for a wide audience, including end users, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. It provides practical guidance on integrating AAL technologies into care settings while safeguarding privacy and ensuring ethical use. The insights offered here aim to empower users and caregivers to make informed choices that enhance both the quality of care and respect for personal autonomy.

cs.HC↗