arXiv subjects

Petros Pechlivanoglou

Publications and source records attributed to Petros Pechlivanoglou.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2022

A Tutorial on Time-Dependent Cohort State-Transition Models in R using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example

In an introductory tutorial, we illustrated building cohort state-transition models (cSTMs) in R, where the state transitions probabilities were constant over time. However, in practice, many cSTMs require transitions, rewards, or both to vary over time (time-dependent). This tutorial illustrates adding two types of time-dependency using a previously published cost-effectiveness analysis of multiple strategies as an example. The first is simulation-time dependence, which allows for the transition probabilities to vary as a function of time as measured since the start of the simulation (e.g., varying probability of death as the cohort ages). The second is state-residence time dependence, allowing for history by tracking the time spent in any particular health state using tunnel states. We use these time-dependent cSTMs to conduct cost-effectiveness and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. We also obtain various epidemiological outcomes of interest from the outputs generated from the cSTM, such as survival probability and disease prevalence, often used for model calibration and validation. We present the mathematical notation first, followed by the R code to execute the calculations. The full R code is provided in a public code repository for broader implementation.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2022

An Introductory Tutorial on Cohort State-Transition Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example

Decision models can combine information from different sources to simulate the long-term consequences of alternative strategies in the presence of uncertainty. A cohort state-transition model (cSTM) is a decision model commonly used in medical decision-making to simulate the transitions of a hypothetical cohort among various health states over time. This tutorial focuses on time-independent cSTM, where transition probabilities among health states remain constant over time. We implement time-independent cSTM in R, an open-source mathematical and statistical programming language. We illustrate time-independent cSTMs using a previously published decision model, calculate costs and effectiveness outcomes, conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of multiple strategies, including a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. We provide open-source code in R to facilitate wider adoption. In a second, more advanced tutorial, we illustrate time-dependent cSTMs.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2020

A Bayesian response-adaptive dose finding and comparative effectiveness trial

Aims: Combinations of treatments can offer additional benefit over the treatments individually. However, trials of these combinations are lower priority than the development of novel therapies, which can restrict funding, timelines and patient availability. This paper develops a novel trial design to facilitate the evaluation of novel combination therapies that combines elements of phase II and phase III trials. Methods: This trial uses response adaptive randomisation to increase the information collected about successful novel drug combinations and Bayesian dose-response modelling to undertake a comparative-effectiveness analysis for the most successful dose combination against a relevant comparator. We used simulation methods to evaluate the probability of selecting the correct optimal dose combination, the operating characteristics and predictive power of this design for a trial in pain management and sedation in paediatric emergency departments. Results: With 410 participants, 5 interim updates of the randomisation ratio and a probability of effectiveness of 0.93, 0.88 and 0.83 for the three dose combinations, we have an 83% chance of randomising the largest number of patients to the drug with the highest probability of effectiveness. Based on this adaptive randomisation procedure, the comparative effectiveness analysis has a type I error of less than 5% and a 93% chance of correctly concluding non-inferiority when the probability of effectiveness for the optimal combination therapy is 0.9. In this case, the trial has a 77% chance of meeting its dual aims of dose finding and comparative effectiveness. Finally, the Bayesian predictive power of the trial is over 90%. Conclusion: The proposed trial has high potential to meet the dual study objectives within a feasible level of recruitment, minimising the administrative burden and recruitment time for a trial.

stat.AP↗