SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Philip Z. Maymin

Publications and source records attributed to Philip Z. Maymin.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Common Risk Factors in Decentralized AI Subnets

I derive a size premium from the constant-product automated market maker used to price Bittensor subnet tokens and test the prediction using daily data on 128 subnets. A small-minus-big factor earns 1.01% daily (Newey-West t = 3.28). The December 2025 halving of token emissions, which the theory predicts should halve the premium, reduces it from 1.17% to 0.51% (p = 0.044). Exact slippage calculations show the premium is implementable only below \$10K in assets under management; at \$100K, transaction costs exceed gross returns.

q-fin.PM

Option Pricing on Automated Market Maker Tokens

We derive the stochastic price process for tokens whose sole price discovery mechanism is a constant-product automated market maker (AMM). When the net flow into the pool follows a diffusion, the token price follows a constant elasticity of variance (CEV) process, nesting Black-Scholes as the limiting case of infinite liquidity. We obtain closed-form European option prices and introduce liquidity-adjusted Greeks. The CEV structure generates a leverage effect -- volatility rises as price falls -- whose normalized implied volatility skew depends only on the pool's weighting parameter, not on pool depth: Black-Scholes underprices 20%-out-of-the-money puts by roughly 6% in implied volatility terms at every pool depth, while the absolute pricing discrepancy vanishes as pools deepen. Empirically, after controlling for pool depth and flow volatility, realized return variance across 90 Bittensor subnets exhibits a strongly negative price elasticity, decisively rejecting geometric Brownian motion and consistent with the CEV prediction. A complementary delta-hedged backtest across 82 subnets confirms near-identical hedging errors at the money, consistent with the prediction that pricing differences are concentrated in the wings.

q-fin.PR

Markets are competitive if and only if P != NP

I prove that competitive market outcomes require computational intractability. If P = NP, firms can efficiently solve the collusion detection problem, identifying deviations from cooperative agreements in complex, noisy markets and thereby making collusion sustainable as an equilibrium. If P != NP, the collusion detection problem is computationally infeasible for markets satisfying a natural instance-hardness condition on their demand structure, rendering punishment threats non-credible and collusion unstable. Combined with Maymin (2011), who proved that market efficiency requires P = NP, this yields a fundamental impossibility: markets can be informationally efficient or competitive, but not both. Artificial intelligence, by expanding firms' computational capabilities, is pushing markets from the competitive regime toward the collusive regime, explaining the empirical emergence of algorithmic collusion without explicit coordination.

cs.GT

A New Kind of Finance

Finance has benefited from the Wolfram's NKS approach but it can and will benefit even more in the future, and the gains from the influence may actually be concentrated among practitioners who unintentionally employ those principles as a group.

q-fin.CP

Any Regulation of Risk Increases Risk

We show that any objective risk measurement algorithm mandated by central banks for regulated financial entities will result in more risk being taken on by those financial entities than would otherwise be the case. Furthermore, the risks taken on by the regulated financial entities are far more systemically concentrated than they would have been otherwise, making the entire financial system more fragile. This result leaves three directions for the future of financial regulation: continue regulating by enforcing risk measurement algorithms at the cost of occasional severe crises, regulate more severely and subjectively by fully nationalizing all financial entities, or abolish all central banking regulations including deposit insurance to let risk be determined by the entities themselves and, ultimately, by their depositors through voluntary market transactions rather than by the taxpayers through enforced government participation.

q-fin.RM

Constructing the Best Trading Strategy: A New General Framework

We introduce a new general framework for constructing the best trading strategy for a given historical indicator. We construct the unique trading strategy with the highest expected return. This optimal strategy may be implemented directly, or its expected return may be used as a benchmark to evaluate how far away from the optimal other proposed strategies for the given indicators are. Separately, we also construct the unique trading strategy with the highest information ratio. In the normal case, when the traded security return is near zero, and for reasonable correlations, the performance differences are economically insignificant. However, when the correlation approaches one, the trading strategy with the highest expected return approaches its maximum information ratio of 1.32 while the trading strategy with the highest information ratio goes to infinity.

q-fin.PM

Schizophrenic Representative Investors

Representative investors whose behaviour is modelled by a deterministic finite automaton generate complexity both in the time series of each asset and in the cross-sectional correlation when the rule governing their behaviour is schizophrenic, meaning the investor must hold multiple seemingly contradictory beliefs simultaneously, either by switching between two different rules at each time step, or computing different responses to different assets.

q-fin.TR