arXiv subjects

Philippe J. Giabbanelli

Publications and source records attributed to Philippe J. Giabbanelli.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Socio-Spatial Patterns of Suicide Mortality in the United States

Suicide causes more than 49,000 deaths annually in the United States, 55% involving firearms. Suicide mortality varies substantially across US counties, but the role of large-scale social networks remains underexplored. We combine county-level suicide mortality data for 2010-2022 with the Facebook Social Connectedness Index (SCI) and measures of exposure to Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs). In population-weighted two-way fixed effects models adjusting for sociodemographic and economic characteristics, COVID-19, drug-overdose and alcohol-related mortality, poor mental health days, state firearm policies, and geographical proximity, a one-standard-deviation increase in the SCI-weighted suicide mortality rate of socially connected counties was associated with 2.47 additional deaths per 100,000 residents in the focal county (95% CI [0.97, 4.00]). A one-standard-deviation increase in ERPO social exposure was associated with 0.266 fewer deaths per 100,000 (coefficient -0.266; 95% CI [-0.403, -0.128]) after adjustment for geographical proximity and state-by-year fixed effects. The social-proximity association persisted under alternative neighborhood definitions and spatial-error models, and subgroup analyses showed heterogeneity by age. These findings show that both suicide mortality and the lower mortality associated with exposure to firearm-restriction policies are patterned along inter-county social ties beyond what is explained by geographical proximity alone.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

Artificial Intelligence and Modeling & Simulation: An Overview

Artificial intelligence (AI) and Modeling & Simulation (M&S) are increasingly intertwined, reflecting converging research needs across both communities, rapid technological advances such as the rise of generative AI, and the growing availability of data and computational resources. This report provides a structured overview of the intersections of AI and M&S. The relationship goes both ways: AI can support, augment, or even replace components of simulation studies, while simulations can serve as data generators, training environments, and evaluation platforms for AI. We organize this landscape along the stages of M&S from model specification and input modeling to execution, experimentation, verification and validation, and output analysis. Selected studies at each stage illustrates how techniques such as Large Language Models have reshaped simulation practices, while highlighting limitations and open challenges. This report also provides a conceptual roadmap that helps readers navigate a rapidly changing ecosystem.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Composing Verifiable Conceptual Models via Building Blocks: Towards Design-Time Verification of Agentic AI Workflows

Agentic AI systems orchestrate multiple LLM-based agents through workflow architectures that coordinate decisions, tools, and external actions. While current platforms emphasize runtime safeguards, little support exists for verifying workflows during system design. From a Modeling \& Simulation perspective, this gap is analogous to composing conceptual models without verifying whether their building blocks interact coherently. We propose a design-time verification approach that models agentic workflows as compositions of reusable building blocks and checks their compatibility through twelve structural rules. We implemented these rules in a software prototype and evaluated them using two openly released datasets: 48 workflows with known design flaws and 168 variants that preserve workflow logic but alter graph structure. Results show that our verifier reliably detects violations even when flawed designs are obscured through structural transformations such as splitting tasks between agents. Future works could combine our verification with community repositories of building blocks to compose safe agentic workflows.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Text-to-Image Generative AI for Modeling and Simulation: Methods, Opportunities, and Applications

Text-to-image generation is a form of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) that converts textual descriptions into images. Most applications of GenAI in modeling and simulation (M&S) have focused on large language models for documentation, coding, or explanation. By contrast, the potential of image generation remains largely unexplored. This tutorial introduces text-to-image generation to the M&S community and details how it can support several M&S tasks, including communicating conceptual models, visualizing simulation outcomes, generating educational materials, and interfacing heterogeneous models in multi-scale simulations. The tutorial combines conceptual guidance with practical workflows, explaining how modern image generators operate, how prompts and simulation outputs can be translated into visual scenes, and how practitioners can integrate these tools into reproducible local pipelines. By focusing on transferable principles rather than specific tools, the tutorial equips M&S practitioners with the knowledge needed to evaluate, adopt, and adapt text-to-image generation in their simulation workflows.

cs.ET↗

arXiv2026

A Guide to Large Language Models in Modeling and Simulation: From Core Techniques to Critical Challenges

Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly become familiar tools to researchers and practitioners. Concepts such as prompting, temperature, or few-shot examples are now widely recognized, and LLMs are increasingly used in Modeling & Simulation (M&S) workflows. However, practices that appear straightforward may introduce subtle issues, unnecessary complexity, or may even lead to inferior results. Adding more data can backfire (e.g., deteriorating performance through model collapse or inadvertently wiping out existing guardrails), spending time on fine-tuning a model can be unnecessary without a prior assessment of what it already knows, setting the temperature to 0 is not sufficient to make LLMs deterministic, providing a large volume of M&S data as input can be excessive (LLMs cannot attend to everything) but naive simplifications can lose information. We aim to provide comprehensive and practical guidance on how to use LLMs, with an emphasis on M&S applications. We discuss common sources of confusion, including non-determinism, knowledge augmentation (including RAG and LoRA), decomposition of M&S data, and hyper-parameter settings. We emphasize principled design choices, diagnostic strategies, and empirical evaluation, with the goal of helping modelers make informed decisions about when, how, and whether to rely on LLMs.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Towards Personalized Explanations for Health Simulations: A Mixed-Methods Framework for Stakeholder-Centric Summarization

Modeling & Simulation (M&S) approaches such as agent-based models hold significant potential to support decision-making activities in health, with recent examples including the adoption of vaccines, and a vast literature on healthy eating behaviors and physical activity behaviors. These models are potentially usable by different stakeholder groups, as they support policy-makers to estimate the consequences of potential interventions and they can guide individuals in making healthy choices in complex environments. However, this potential may not be fully realized because of the models' complexity, which makes them inaccessible to the stakeholders who could benefit the most. While Large Language Models (LLMs) can translate simulation outputs and the design of models into text, current approaches typically rely on one-size-fits-all summaries that fail to reflect the varied informational needs and stylistic preferences of clinicians, policymakers, patients, caregivers, and health advocates. This limitation stems from a fundamental gap: we lack a systematic understanding of what these stakeholders need from explanations and how to tailor them accordingly. To address this gap, we present a step-by-step framework to identify stakeholder needs and guide LLMs in generating tailored explanations of health simulations. Our procedure uses a mixed-methods design by first eliciting the explanation needs and stylistic preferences of diverse health stakeholders, then optimizing the ability of LLMs to generate tailored outputs (e.g., via controllable attribute tuning), and then evaluating through a comprehensive range of metrics to further improve the tailored generation of summaries.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Mitigation of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in AI-Generated Stories through Model Explanations

Language models have been shown to propagate social bias through their output, particularly in the representation of gender and ethnicity. This paper investigates gender and ethnicity biases in AI-generated occupational stories. Representation biases are measured before and after applying our proposed mitigation strategy, Bias Analysis and Mitigation through Explanation (BAME), revealing improvements in demographic representation ranging from 2% to 20%. BAME leverages model-generated explanations to inform targeted prompt engineering, effectively reducing biases without modifying model parameters. By analyzing stories generated across 25 occupational groups, three large language models (Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, and GPT-4 Turbo), and multiple demographic dimensions, we identify persistent patterns of overrepresentation and underrepresentation linked to training data stereotypes. Our findings demonstrate that guiding models with their own internal reasoning mechanisms can significantly enhance demographic parity, thereby contributing to the development of more transparent generative AI systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

From over-reliance to smart integration: using Large-Language Models as translators between specialized modeling and simulation tools

Large Language Models (LLMs) offer transformative potential for Modeling & Simulation (M&S) through natural language interfaces that simplify workflows. However, over-reliance risks compromising quality due to ambiguities, logical shortcuts, and hallucinations. This paper advocates integrating LLMs as middleware or translators between specialized tools to mitigate complexity in M&S tasks. Acting as translators, LLMs can enhance interoperability across multi-formalism, multi-semantics, and multi-paradigm systems. We address two key challenges: identifying appropriate languages and tools for modeling and simulation tasks, and developing efficient software architectures that integrate LLMs without performance bottlenecks. To this end, the paper explores LLM-mediated workflows, emphasizes structured tool integration, and recommends Low-Rank Adaptation-based architectures for efficient task-specific adaptations. This approach ensures LLMs complement rather than replace specialized tools, fostering high-quality, reliable M&S processes.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Broadening Access to Simulations for End-Users via Large Language Models: Challenges and Opportunities

Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming ubiquitous to create intelligent virtual assistants that assist users in interacting with a system, as exemplified in marketing. Although LLMs have been discussed in Modeling & Simulation (M&S), the community has focused on generating code or explaining results. We examine the possibility of using LLMs to broaden access to simulations, by enabling non-simulation end-users to ask what-if questions in everyday language. Specifically, we discuss the opportunities and challenges in designing such an end-to-end system, divided into three broad phases. First, assuming the general case in which several simulation models are available, textual queries are mapped to the most relevant model. Second, if a mapping cannot be found, the query can be automatically reformulated and clarifying questions can be generated. Finally, simulation results are produced and contextualized for decision-making. Our vision for such system articulates long-term research opportunities spanning M&S, LLMs, information retrieval, and ethics.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Accelerating Hybrid Agent-Based Models and Fuzzy Cognitive Maps: How to Combine Agents who Think Alike?

While Agent-Based Models can create detailed artificial societies based on individual differences and local context, they can be computationally intensive. Modelers may offset these costs through a parsimonious use of the model, for example by using smaller population sizes (which limits analyses in sub-populations), running fewer what-if scenarios, or accepting more uncertainty by performing fewer simulations. Alternatively, researchers may accelerate simulations via hardware solutions (e.g., GPU parallelism) or approximation approaches that operate a tradeoff between accuracy and compute time. In this paper, we present an approximation that combines agents who `think alike', thus reducing the population size and the compute time. Our innovation relies on representing agent behaviors as networks of rules (Fuzzy Cognitive Maps) and empirically evaluating different measures of distance between these networks. Then, we form groups of think-alike agents via community detection and simplify them to a representative agent. Case studies show that our simplifications remain accuracy.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

Narrating Causal Graphs with Large Language Models

The use of generative AI to create text descriptions from graphs has mostly focused on knowledge graphs, which connect concepts using facts. In this work we explore the capability of large pretrained language models to generate text from causal graphs, where salient concepts are represented as nodes and causality is represented via directed, typed edges. The causal reasoning encoded in these graphs can support applications as diverse as healthcare or marketing. Using two publicly available causal graph datasets, we empirically investigate the performance of four GPT-3 models under various settings. Our results indicate that while causal text descriptions improve with training data, compared to fact-based graphs, they are harder to generate under zero-shot settings. Results further suggest that users of generative AI can deploy future applications faster since similar performances are obtained when training a model with only a few examples as compared to fine-tuning via a large curated dataset.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

GPT-Based Models Meet Simulation: How to Efficiently Use Large-Scale Pre-Trained Language Models Across Simulation Tasks

The disruptive technology provided by large-scale pre-trained language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or GPT-4 has received significant attention in several application domains, often with an emphasis on high-level opportunities and concerns. This paper is the first examination regarding the use of LLMs for scientific simulations. We focus on four modeling and simulation tasks, each time assessing the expected benefits and limitations of LLMs while providing practical guidance for modelers regarding the steps involved. The first task is devoted to explaining the structure of a conceptual model to promote the engagement of participants in the modeling process. The second task focuses on summarizing simulation outputs, so that model users can identify a preferred scenario. The third task seeks to broaden accessibility to simulation platforms by conveying the insights of simulation visualizations via text. Finally, the last task evokes the possibility of explaining simulation errors and providing guidance to resolve them.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2021

FCMpy: A Python Module for Constructing and Analyzing Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

FCMpy is an open source package in Python for building and analyzing Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. More specifically, the package allows 1) deriving fuzzy causal weights from qualitative data, 2) simulating the system behavior, 3) applying machine learning algorithms (e.g., Nonlinear Hebbian Learning, Active Hebbian Learning, Genetic Algorithms and Deterministic Learning) to adjust the FCM causal weight matrix and to solve classification problems, and 4) implementing scenario analysis by simulating hypothetical interventions (i.e., analyzing what-if scenarios).

cs.MS↗

arXiv2015

An Algebra to Merge Heterogeneous Classifiers

In distributed classification, each learner observes its environment and deduces a classifier. As a learner has only a local view of its environment, classifiers can be exchanged among the learners and integrated, or merged, to improve accuracy. However, the operation of merging is not defined for most classifiers. Furthermore, the classifiers that have to be merged may be of different types in settings such as ad-hoc networks in which several generations of sensors may be creating classifiers. We introduce decision spaces as a framework for merging possibly different classifiers. We formally study the merging operation as an algebra, and prove that it satisfies a desirable set of properties. The impact of time is discussed for the two main data mining settings. Firstly, decision spaces can naturally be used with non-stationary distributions, such as the data collected by sensor networks, as the impact of a model decays over time. Secondly, we introduce an approach for stationary distributions, such as homogeneous databases partitioned over different learners, which ensures that all models have the same impact. We also present a method that uses storage flexibly to achieve different types of decay for non-stationary distributions. Finally, we show that the algebraic approach developed for merging can also be used to analyze the behaviour of other operators.

cs.DM↗