arXiv subjects

Pierre Clairambault

Publications and source records attributed to Pierre Clairambault.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Wiring the Pi-calculus to Denotational Semantics

We introduce a dialect of the Asynchronous pi-calculus, called AWpi, in which (1) an input name may be owned, at any time, by at most one process; (2) each name has either only the input or only the output capability. As a result, special processes called wires (aka forwarders, that is, processes that receive values at one name and re-transmit) behave as substitutions when composed with any AWpi process. Thus AWpi naturally yields a category, whose morphisms are AWpi processes (modulo the reference behavioural equivalence, barbed congruence) and whose objects are types; and where wires act as identity morphisms. We show that the category of processes can be further organised into (sub)categories with the structures needed for the interpretation of common higher-order language features in the literature by drawing on insights from game semantics; notably, we construct a relative Seely category, the categorical structure that concurrent game semantics has. At the same time, AWpi follows the tradition of ordinary pi-calculi in that expressiveness is preserved and the operational and algebraic theory are developed in a similar manner, notwithstanding substantial technical differences in their development and proofs. In short, the goal of AWpi is to remain faithful to the operational and algebraic tradition of the pi-calculi while connecting to the tradition of denotational models for programming languages.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Extensional Taylor Expansion

We introduce a calculus of extensional resource terms. These are resource terms à la Ehrhard-Regnier, but in infinitely eta-long form. The calculus still retains a finite syntax and dynamics: in particular, we prove strong confluence and normalization. Then we define an extensional version of Taylor expansion, mapping ordinary lambda-terms to (possibly infinite) linear combinations of extensional resource terms: like in the ordinary case, the dynamics of our resource calculus allows us to simulate the beta-reduction of lambda-terms; the extensional nature of this expansion shows in the fact that we are also able to simulate eta-reduction. In a sense, extensional resource terms contain a language of finite approximants of Nakajima trees, much like ordinary resource terms can be seen as a richer version of finite Böhm trees. We show that the equivalence induced on lambda-terms by the normalization of extensional Taylor-expansion is nothing but H*, the greatest consistent sensible lambda-theory -- which is also the theory induced by Nakajima trees. This characterization provides a new, simple way to exhibit models of H*: it becomes sufficient to model the extensional resource calculus and its dynamics. The extensional resource calculus moreover allows us to recover, in an untyped setting, a connection between Taylor expansion and game semantics that was previously limited to the typed setting. Indeed, simply typed, eta-long, beta-normal resource terms are known to be in bijective correspondence with plays in the sense of Hyland-Ong game semantics, up to Melliès' homotopy equivalence. Extensional resource terms are the appropriate counterpart of eta-long resource terms in an untyped setting: we spell out the bijection between normal extensional resource terms and isomorphism classes of augmentations (a canonical presentation of plays up to homotopy) in the universal arena.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

From Thin Concurrent Games to Generalized Species of Structures (Extended Version)

Two families of denotational models have emerged from the semantic analysis of linear logic: dynamic models, typically presented as game semantics, and static models, typically based on a category of relations. In this paper we introduce a formal bridge between a dynamic model and a static model: the model of thin concurrent games and strategies, based on event structures, and the model of generalized species of structures, based on distributors. A special focus of this paper is the two-dimensional nature of the dynamic-static relationship, which we formalize with double categories and bicategories. In the first part of the paper, we construct a symmetric monoidal oplax functor from linear concurrent strategies to distributors. We highlight two fundamental differences between the two models: the composition mechanism, and the representation of resource symmetries. In the second part of the paper, we adapt established methods from game semantics (visible strategies, payoff structure) to enforce a tighter connection between the two models. We obtain a cartesian closed pseudofunctor, which we exploit to shed new light on recent results in the theory of the lambda-calculus.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Strategies as Resource Terms, and their Categorical Semantics

As shown by Tsukada and Ong, simply-typed, normal and eta-long resource terms correspond to plays in Hyland-Ong games, quotiented by Melliès' homotopy equivalence. The original proof of this inspiring result is indirect, relying on the injectivity of the relational model w.r.t. both sides of the correspondence -- in particular, the dynamics of the resource calculus is taken into account only via the compatibility of the relational model with the composition of normal terms defined by normalization. In the present paper, we revisit and extend these results. Our first contribution is to restate the correspondence by considering causal structures we call augmentations, which are canonical representatives of Hyland-Ong plays up to homotopy. This allows us to give a direct and explicit account of the connection with normal resource terms. As a second contribution, we extend this account to the reduction of resource terms: building on a notion of strategies as weighted sums of augmentations, we provide a denotational model of the resource calculus, invariant under reduction. A key step -- and our third contribution -- is a categorical model we call a resource category, which is to the resource calculus what differential categories are to the differential lambda-calculus.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

The Qualitative Collapse of Concurrent Games

In this paper, we construct an interpretation-preserving functor from a category of concurrent games to the category of Scott domains and Scott-continuous functions. We give a concrete description of this functor, extending earlier results on the relational collapse of game semantics. The crux is an intricate combinatorial lemma allowing us to synchronize states of strategies which reach the same resources, but with different multiplicity. Putting this together with the previously established relational collapse, this provides a new proof of the qualitative-quantitative correspondence first established by Ehrhard in his celebrated extensional collapse theorem. Whereas Ehrhard's proof is indirect and rests on an abstract realizability construction, our result gives a concrete, combinatorial description of the extraction of quantitative information from a qualitative model.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Disentangling Parallelism and Interference in Game Semantics

Game semantics is a denotational semantics presenting compositionally the computational behaviour of various kinds of effectful programs. One of its celebrated achievement is to have obtained full abstraction results for programming languages with a variety of computational effects, in a single framework. This is known as the semantic cube or Abramsky's cube, which for sequential deterministic programs establishes a correspondence between certain conditions on strategies (''innocence'', ''well-bracketing'', ''visibility'') and the absence of matching computational effects. Outside of the sequential deterministic realm, there are still a wealth of game semantics-based full abstraction results; but they no longer fit in a unified canvas. In particular, Ghica and Murawski's fully abstract model for shared state concurrency (IA) does not have a matching notion of pure parallel program-we say that parallelism and interference (i.e. state plus semaphores) are entangled. In this paper we construct a causal version of Ghica and Murawski's model, also fully abstract for IA. We provide compositional conditions parallel innocence and sequentiality, respectively banning interference and parallelism, and leading to four full abstraction results. To our knowledge, this is the first extension of Abramsky's semantic cube programme beyond the sequential deterministic world.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

An Analysis of Symmetry in Quantitative Semantics

In this paper, we build on a recent bicategorical model called thin spans of groupoids, introduced by Clairambault and Forest. Notably, thin spans feature a decomposition of symmetry into two sub-groupoids of polarized -- positive and negative -- symmetries. We first construct a variation of the original exponential of thin spans, based on sequences rather than families. Then we give a syntactic characterisation of the interpretation of simply-typed lambda-terms in thin spans, in terms of rigid intersection types and rigid resource terms. Finally, we formally relate thin spans with the weighted relational model and generalized species of structure. This allows us to show how some quantities in those models reflect polarized symmetries: in particular we show that the weighted relational model counts witnesses from generalized species of structure, divided by the cardinal of a group of positive symmetries.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

The Cartesian Closed Bicategory of Thin Spans of Groupoids

Recently, there has been growing interest in bicategorical models of programming languages, which are "proof-relevant" in the sense that they keep distinct account of execution traces leading to the same observable outcomes, while assigning a formal meaning to reduction paths as isomorphisms. In this paper we introduce a new model, a bicategory called thin spans of groupoids. Conceptually it is close to Fiore et al.'s generalized species of structures and to Melliès' homotopy template games, but fundamentally differs as to how replication of resources and the resulting symmetries are treated. Where those models are saturated -- the interpretation is inflated by the fact that semantic individuals may carry arbitrary symmetries -- our model is thin, drawing inspiration from thin concurrent games: the interpretation of terms carries no symmetries, but semantic individuals satisfy a subtle invariant defined via biorthogonality, which guarantees their invariance under symmetry. We first build the bicategory $\mathbf{Thin}$ of thin spans of groupoids. Its objects are certain groupoids with additional structure, its morphisms are spans composed via plain pullback with identities the identity spans, and its $2$-cells are span morphisms making the induced triangles commute only up to natural isomorphism. We then equip $\mathbf{Thin}$ with a pseudocomonad $!$, and finally show that the Kleisli bicategory $\mathbf{Thin}_{!}$ is cartesian closed.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

The Mays and Musts of Concurrent Strategies

Concurrent strategies based on event structures are examined from the viewpoint of 'may' and 'must' testing in traditional process calculi. In their pure form concurrent strategies fail to expose the deadlocks and divergences that can arise in their composition. This motivates an extension of the bicategory of concurrent strategies to treat the 'may' and 'must' behaviour of strategies under testing. One extension adjoins neutral moves to strategies but in so doing loses identities w.r.t. composition. This in turn motivates another extension in which concurrent strategies are accompanied by stopping configurations; the ensuing stopping strategies inherit the structure of a bicategory from that of strategies. The technical developments converge in providing characterisations of the 'may' and 'must' equivalences and preorders on strategies.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

The Quantitative Collapse of Concurrent Games with Symmetry

We explore links between the thin concurrent games of Castellan, Clairambault and Winskel, and the weighted relational models of linear logic studied by Laird, Manzonetto, McCusker and Pagani. More precisely, we show that there is an interpretationpreserving "collapse" functor from the former to the latter. On objects, the functor defines for each game a set of possible execution states. Defining the action on morphisms is more subtle, and this is the main contribution of the paper. Given a strategy and an execution state, our functor needs to count the witnesses for this state within the strategy. Strategies in thin concurrent games describe non-linear behaviour explicitly, so in general each witness exists in countably many symmetric copies. The challenge is to define the right notion of witnesses, factoring out this infinity while matching the weighted relational model. Understanding how witnesses compose is particularly subtle and requires a delve into the combinatorics of witnesses and their symmetries. In its basic form, this functor connects thin concurrent games and a relational model weighted by N $\cup$ {+$\infty$}. We will additionally consider a generalised setting where both models are weighted by elements of an arbitrary continuous semiring; this covers the probabilistic case, among others. Witnesses now additionally carry a value from the semiring, and our interpretation-preserving collapse functor extends to this setting.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Positional Injectivity for Innocent Strategies

In asynchronous games, Melli{è}s proved that innocent strategies are positional: their behaviour only depends on the position, not the temporal order used to reach it. This insightful result shaped our understanding of the link between dynamic (i.e. game) and static (i.e. relational) semantics. In this paper, we investigate the positionality of innocent strategies in the traditional setting of Hyland-Ong-Nickau-Coquand pointer games. We show that though innocent strategies are not positional, total finite innocent strategies still enjoy a key consequence of positionality, namely positional injectivity: they are entirely determined by their positions. Unfortunately, this does not hold in general: we show a counterexample if finiteness and totality are lifted. For finite partial strategies we leave the problem open; we show however the partial result that two strategies with the same positions must have the same P-views of maximal length.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2020

Categories with Families: Unityped, Simply Typed, and Dependently Typed

We show how the categorical logic of untyped, simply typed and dependently typed lambda calculus can be structured around the notion of category with family (cwf). To this end we introduce subcategories of simply typed cwfs (scwfs), where types do not depend on variables, and unityped cwfs (ucwfs), where there is only one type. We prove several equivalence and biequivalence theorems between cwf-based notions and basic notions of categorical logic, such as cartesian operads, Lawvere theories, categories with finite products and limits, cartesian closed categories, and locally cartesian closed categories. Some of these theorems depend on the restrictions of contextuality (in the sense of Cartmell) or democracy (used by Clairambault and Dybjer for their biequivalence theorems). Some theorems are equivalences between notions with strict preservation of chosen structure. Others are biequivalences between notions where properties are only preserved up to isomorphism. In addition to this we discuss various constructions of initial ucwfs, scwfs, and cwfs with extra structure.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2020

Learning to Count up to Symmetry

In this paper we develop the theory of how to count, in thin concurrent games, the configurations of a strategy witnessing that it reaches a certain configuration of the game. This plays a central role in many recent developments in concurrent games, whenever one aims to relate concurrent strategies with weighted relational models. The difficulty, of course, is symmetry: in the presence of symmetry many configurations of the strategy are, morally, different instances of the same, only differing on the inessential choice of copy indices. How do we know which ones to count? The purpose of the paper is to clarify that, uncovering many strange phenomena and fascinating pathological examples along the way. To illustrate the results, we show that a collapse operation to a simple weighted relational model simply counting witnesses is preserved under composition, provided the strategies involved do not deadlock.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2019

Thin Games with Symmetry and Concurrent Hyland-Ong Games

We build a cartesian closed category, called Cho, based on event structures. It allows an interpretation of higher-order stateful concurrent programs that is refined and precise: on the one hand it is conservative with respect to standard Hyland-Ong games when interpreting purely functional programs as innocent strategies, while on the other hand it is much more expressive. The interpretation of programs constructs compositionally a representation of their execution that exhibits causal dependencies and remembers the points of non-deterministic branching.The construction is in two stages. First, we build a compact closed category Tcg. It is a variant of Rideau and Winskel's category CG, with the difference that games and strategies in Tcg are equipped with symmetry to express that certain events are essentially the same. This is analogous to the underlying category of AJM games enriching simple games with an equivalence relations on plays. Building on this category, we construct the cartesian closed category Cho as having as objects the standard arenas of Hyland-Ong games, with strategies, represented by certain events structures, playing on games with symmetry obtained as expanded forms of these arenas.To illustrate and give an operational light on these constructions, we interpret (a close variant of) Idealized Parallel Algol in Cho.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2017

Undecidability of Equality in the Free Locally Cartesian Closed Category (Extended version)

We show that a version of Martin-Löf type theory with an extensional identity type former I, a unit type N1 , Sigma-types, Pi-types, and a base type is a free category with families (supporting these type formers) both in a 1- and a 2-categorical sense. It follows that the underlying category of contexts is a free locally cartesian closed category in a 2-categorical sense because of a previously proved biequivalence. We show that equality in this category is undecidable by reducing it to the undecidability of convertibility in combinatory logic. Essentially the same construction also shows a slightly strengthened form of the result that equality in extensional Martin-Löf type theory with one universe is undecidable.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2017

Games and Strategies as Event Structures

In 2011, Rideau and Winskel introduced concurrent games and strategies as event structures, generalizing prior work on causal formulations of games. In this paper we give a detailed, self-contained and slightly-updated account of the results of Rideau and Winskel: a notion of pre-strategy based on event structures; a characterisation of those pre-strategies (deemed strategies) which are preserved by composition with a copycat strategy; and the construction of a bicategory of these strategies. Furthermore, we prove that the corresponding category has a compact closed structure, and hence forms the basis for the semantics of concurrent higher-order computation.

math.LO↗

arXiv2015

Bounding linear head reduction and visible interaction through skeletons

In this paper, we study the complexity of execution in higher-order programming languages. Our study has two facets: on the one hand we give an upper bound to the length of interactions between bounded P-visible strategies in Hyland-Ong game semantics. This result covers models of programming languages with access to computational effects like non-determinism, state or control operators, but its semantic formulation causes a loose connection to syntax. On the other hand we give a syntactic counterpart of our semantic study: a non-elementary upper bound to the length of the linear head reduction sequence (a low-level notion of reduction, close to the actual implementation of the reduction of higher-order programs by abstract machines) of simply-typed lambda-terms. In both cases our upper bounds are proved optimal by giving matching lower bounds. These two results, although different in scope, are proved using the same method: we introduce a simple reduction on finite trees of natural numbers, hereby called interaction skeletons. We study this reduction and give upper bounds to its complexity. We then apply this study by giving two simulation results: a semantic one measuring progress in game-theoretic interaction via interaction skeletons, and a syntactic one establishing a correspondence between linear head reduction of terms satisfying a locality condition called local scope and the reduction of interaction skeletons. This result is then generalized to arbitrary terms by a local scopization transformation.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2012

Isomorphisms of types in the presence of higher-order references (extended version)

We investigate the problem of type isomorphisms in the presence of higher-order references. We first introduce a finitary programming language with sum types and higher-order references, for which we build a fully abstract games model following the work of Abramsky, Honda and McCusker. Solving an open problem by Laurent, we show that two finitely branching arenas are isomorphic if and only if they are geometrically the same, up to renaming of moves (Laurent's forest isomorphism). We deduce from this an equational theory characterizing isomorphisms of types in our language. We show however that Laurent's conjecture does not hold on infinitely branching arenas, yielding new non-trivial type isomorphisms in a variant of our language with natural numbers.

cs.LO↗