Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Pierre Dèbes

Publications and source records attributed to Pierre Dèbes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Hurwitz spaces and Inverse Galois Theory

Hurwitz spaces which parametrize branched covers of the line play a prominent role in inverse Galois theory. This paper surveys fifty years of works in this direction with emphasis on recent advances. Based on the Riemann-Hurwitz theory of covers, the geometric and arithmetic setup is first reviewed, followed by the semi-modern developments of the 1990--2010 period: large fields, compactification, descent theory, modular towers. The second half of the paper highlights more recent achievements that have reshaped the arithmetic of Hurwitz spaces, notably via the systematic study of the ring of components. These include the construction of components defined over ${\mathbb Q}$, and the Ellenberg-Venkatesh-Westerland approach to rational points over finite fields, applied to the Cohen-Lenstra heuristics and the Malle conjecture over function fields ${\mathbb F}_q(T)$.

math.NT↗

Integrally Hilbertian rings and the polynomial Schinzel hypothesis

The classical Hilbert specialization property is a field-theoretic tool ensuring that polynomial irreducibility over a field is preserved under specialization of some of the variables. We develop an integral counterpart by introducing the notion of {integrally Hilbertian rings}, where specialization takes place inside a ring and irreducibility is required over the ring. A core part shows how new obstacles to irreducibility such as coefficient divisors or fixed divisors can be dealt with over Krull domains, a large class of rings including UFDs, Dedekind domains, etc. As a result, we obtain a general criterion for integral hilbertianity, along with many examples, \hbox{e.g.} all rings of integers of number fields. Polynomial rings over arbitrary domains are other examples. As an application, we prove a polynomial variant of the Schinzel Hypothesis on prime values of polynomials with integer coefficients: if $\mathcal{Z}$ is an integrally Hilbertian ring, the hypothesis becomes a true statement if the ring of integers ${\mathbb Z}$ is replaced by the polynomial ring $\mathcal{Z}[U]$ and ``prime'' by ``irreducible''. This result generalizes previous works and fits in a unified framework for Schinzel-type phenomena that we introduce. We further obtain an additional conclusion that has some noteworthy consequences for the classical Schinzel Hypothesis itself.

math.NT↗

Improvements on dimension growth results and effective Hilbert's irreducibility theorem

We sharpen and generalize the dimension growth bounds for the number of points of bounded height lying on an irreducible algebraic variety of degree $d$, over any global field. In particular, we focus on the affine hypersurface situation by relaxing the condition on the top degree homogeneous part of the polynomial describing the affine hypersurface, while sharpening the dependence on the degree in the bounds compared to previous results. We formulate a conjecture about plane curves which provides a conjectural approach to the uniform degree $3$ case (the only remaining open case). For induction on dimension, we develop a higher dimensional effective version of Hilbert's irreducibility theorem, which is of independent interest.

math.NT↗

Polynomial equations modulo prime numbers

We consider polynomial equations, or systems of polynomial equations, with integer coefficients, modulo prime numbers $p$. We offer an elementary approach based on a counting method. The outcome is a weak form of the Lang-Weil lower bound for the number of solutions modulo $p$, only differing from Lang-Weil by an asymptotic $p^ε$ multiplicative factor. Our second contribution is a reduction lemma to the case of a single equation which we use to extend our results to systems of equations. We show further how to use this reduction to prove the full Lang-Weil estimate for varieties, assuming it for hypersurfaces, in a version using a variant of the classical degree in the error term.

math.NT↗

Coprime values of polynomials in several variables

Given two polynomials $P(\underline x)$, $Q(\underline x)$ in one or more variables and with integer coefficients, how does the property that they are coprime relate to their values $P(\underline n), Q(\underline n)$ at integer points $\underline n$ being coprime? We show that the set of all $\gcd (P(\underline n), Q(\underline n))$ is stable under gcd and under lcm. A notable consequence is a result of Schinzel: if in addition $P$ and $Q$ have no fixed prime divisor (i.e., no prime dividing all values $P(\underline n)$, $Q(\underline n)$), then $P$ and $Q$ assume coprime values at "many" integer points. Conversely we show that if "sufficiently many" integer points yield values that are coprime (or of small gcd) then the original polynomials must be coprime. Another noteworthy consequence of this paper is a version over the ring of integers of Hilbert's irreducibility theorem.

math.NT↗

The Hilbert-Schinzel specialization property

We establish a version "over the ring" of the celebrated Hilbert Irreducibility Theorem. Given finitely many polynomials in $k+n$ variables, with coefficients in $\mathbb Z$, of positive degree in the last $n$ variables, we show that if they are irreducible over $\mathbb Z$ and satisfy a necessary "Schinzel condition", then the first $k$ variables can be specialized in a Zariski-dense subset of ${\mathbb Z}^k$ in such a way that irreducibility over ${\mathbb Z}$ is preserved for the polynomials in the remaining $n$ variables. The Schinzel condition, which comes from the Schinzel Hypothesis, is that, when specializing the first $k$ variables in ${\mathbb Z}^k$, the product of the polynomials should not always be divisible by some common prime number. Our result also improves on a "coprime" version of the Schinzel Hypothesis: under some Schinzel condition, coprime polynomials assume coprime values. We prove our results over many other rings than $\mathbb Z$, e.g. UFDs and Dedekind domains for the last one.

math.NT↗

Rational pullbacks of Galois covers

The finite subgroups of ${\rm PGL}_2(\mathbb{C})$ are shown to be the only finite groups $G$ with this property: for some integer $r_0$ (depending on $G$), all Galois covers $X\rightarrow \mathbb{P}^1_{\mathbb{C}}$ of group $G$ can be obtained by pulling back those with at most $r_0$ branch points along non-constant rational maps $\mathbb{P}^1_{\mathbb{C}} \rightarrow \mathbb{P}^1_{\mathbb{C}}$. For $G\subset {\rm PGL}_2(\mathbb{C})$, it is in fact enough to pull back one well-chosen cover with at most $3$ branch points. A consequence of the converse for inverse Galois theory is that, for $G\not \subset {\rm PGL}_2({\mathbb{C}})$, letting the branch point number grow provides truly new Galois realizations $F/{\mathbb{C}}(T)$ of $G$. Another application is that the ``Beckmann--Black'' property that ``any two Galois covers of $\mathbb{P}^1_{\mathbb{C}}$ with the same group $G$ are always pullbacks of another Galois cover of group $G$'' only holds if $G\subset {\rm PGL}_2({\mathbb{C}})$.

math.NT↗

On parametric and generic polynomials with one parameter

Given fields $k \subseteq L$, our results concern one parameter $L$-parametric polynomials over $k$, and their relation to generic polynomials. The former are polynomials $P(T,Y) \in k[T][Y]$ of group $G$ which parametrize all Galois extensions of $L$ of group $G$ via specialization of $T$ in $L$, and the latter are those which are $L$-parametric for every field $L \supseteq k$. We show, for example, that being $L$-parametric with $L$ taken to be the single field $\mathbb{C}((V))(U)$ is in fact sufficient for a polynomial $P(T, Y) \in \mathbb{C}[T][Y]$ to be generic. As a corollary, we obtain a complete list of one parameter generic polynomials over a given field of characteristic 0, complementing the classical literature on the topic. Our approach also applies to an old problem of Schinzel: subject to the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, we provide one parameter families of affine curves over number fields, all with a rational point, but with no rational generic point.

math.NT↗

Pre-Galois theory

We introduce and study a class of field extensions that we call pre-Galois; viz. extensions that become Galois after some linearly disjoint Galois base change. Among them are geometrically Galois extensions of k(T), with k a field: extensions that become Galois and remain of the same degree after passing to the algebraic closure of k. We develop a pre-Galois theory that includes a Galois correspondence, and investigate the corresponding variants of the inverse Galois problem. We provide answers in situations where the classical analogs are not known. In particular, for every finite simple group, some power is a geometric Galois group over k, and is a pre-Galois group over k if k is Hilbertian. For every finite group G, the same conclusion holds for G itself (n=1) if k is the maximal abelian extension E of the rationals and G has a weakly rigid tuple of conjugacy classes; and then G is a regular Galois group over an extension of E of degree dividing the order of Out(G). We also show that the inverse problem for pre-Galois extensions over a field k (that every finite group is a pre-Galois group over k) is equivalent to the a priori stronger inverse Galois problem over k, and similarly for the geometric vs. regular variants.

math.NT↗

Prime and coprime values of polynomials

The Schinzel Hypothesis is a celebrated conjecture in number theory linking polynomial values and prime numbers. In the same vein we investigate the common divisors of values $P_1(n),\ldots, P_s(n)$ of several polynomials. We deduce this coprime version of the Schinzel Hypothesis: under some natural assumption, coprime polynomials assume coprime values at infinitely many integers. Consequences include a version "modulo an integer" of the original Schinzel Hypothesis, with the Goldbach conjecture, again modulo an integer, as a special case.

math.NT↗

The relative Schinzel hypothesis

The Schinzel Hypothesis is a conjecture about irreducible polynomials in one variable over the integers: under some standard condition, they should assume infinitely many prime values at integers. We consider a relative version: if the polynomials are relatively prime and no prime number divides all their values at integers, then they assume relatively prime values at at least one integer. We extend the question to all integral domains and prove it for a number of them: PIDs, UFDs containing an infinite field, polynomial rings over a UFD. Applications include a new "integral" version of the Hilbert Irreducibility Theorem, for which the irreducibility conclusion is over the ring.

math.NT↗

The Schinzel Hypothesis for Polynomials

The Schinzel hypothesis is a famous conjectural statement about primes in value sets of polynomials, which generalizes the Dirichlet theorem about primes in an arithmetic progression. We consider the situation that the ring of integers is replaced by a polynomial ring and prove the Schinzel hypothesis for a wide class of them: polynomials in at least one variable over the integers, polynomials in several variables over an arbitrary field, etc. We achieve this goal by developing a version over rings of the Hilbert specialization property. A polynomial Goldbach conjecture is deduced, along with a result on spectra of rational functions.

math.NT↗

Groups with no Parametric Galois Extension

We disprove a strong form of the Regular Inverse Galois Problem: there exist finite groups $G$ which do not have a realization $F/\Qq(T)$ that induces all Galois extensions $L/\Qq(U)$ of group $G$ by specializing $T$ to $f(U) \in \Qq(U)$. For these groups, we produce two extensions $L/\Qq(U)$ that cannot be simultaneously induced, thus even disproving a weaker Lifting Property. Our examples of such groups $G$ include symmetric groups $S_n$, $n\geq 7$, infinitely many $PSL_2(\Ff_p)$, the Monster. Two variants of the question with $\Qq(U)$ replaced by $\Cc(U)$ and $\Qq$ are answered similarly, the second one under a diophantine "working hypothesis" going back to a problem of Schinzel. We introduce two new tools: a comparizon theorem between the invariants of an extension $F/\Cc(T)$ and those obtained by specializing $T$ to $f(U) \in \Cc(U)$, and, given two regular Galois extensions of $k(T)$, a finite set of polynomials $P(U,T,Y)$ that say whether these extensions have a common specialization $E/k$.

math.NT↗

Families of polynomials and their specializations

For a polynomial in several variables depending on some parameters, we discuss some results to the effect that for almost all values of the parameters the polynomial is irreducible. In particular we recast in this perspective some results of Grothendieck and of Gao.

math.AG↗

On the Malle conjecture and the self-twisted cover

We show that for a large class of finite groups G, the number of Galois extensions E/Q of group G and discriminant $|d_E|\leq y$ grows like a power of $y$ (for some specified exponent). The groups G are the regular Galois groups over Q and the extensions E/Q that we count are obtained by specialization from a given regular Galois extension F/Q(T). The extensions E/Q can further be prescribed any unramified local behavior at each suitably large prime $p\leq \log (y)/δ$ for some $δ\geq 1$. This result is a step toward the Malle conjecture on the number of Galois extensions of given group and bounded discriminant. The local conditions further make it a notable constraint on regular Galois groups over Q. The method uses the notion of self-twisted cover that we introduce.

math.NT↗

Tchebotarev theorems for function fields

We prove Tchebotarev type theorems for function field extensions over various base fields: number fields, finite fields, p-adic fields, PAC fields, etc. The Tchebotarev conclusion - existence of appropriate cyclic residue extensions - also compares to the Hilbert specialization property. It is more local but holds in more situations and extends to infinite extensions. For a function field extension satisfying the Tchebotarev conclusion, the exponent of the Galois group is bounded by the l.c.m. of the local specialization degrees. Further local-global questions arise for which we provide answers, examples and counter-examples.

math.NT↗

Specialization results in Galois theory

The paper has three main applications. The first one is this Hilbert-Grunwald statement. If $f:X\rightarrow \Pp^1$ is a degree $n$ $\Qq$-cover with monodromy group $S_n$ over $\bar\Qq$, and finitely many suitably big primes $p$ are given with partitions $\{d_{p,1},..., d_{p,s_p}\}$ of $n$, there exist infinitely many specializations of $f$ at points $t_0\in \Qq$ that are degree $n$ field extensions with residue degrees $d_{p,1},..., d_{p,s_p}$ at each prescribed prime $p$. The second one provides a description of the se-pa-ra-ble closure of a PAC field $k$ of characteristic $p\not=2$: it is generated by all elements $y$ such that $y^m-y\in k$ for some $m\geq 2$. The third one involves Hurwitz moduli spaces and concerns fields of definition of covers. A common tool is a criterion for an étale algebra $\prod_lE_l/k$ over a field $k$ to be the specialization of a $k$-cover $f:X\rightarrow B$ at some point $t_0\in B(k)$. The question is reduced to finding $k$-rational points on a certain $k$-variety, and then studied over the various fields $k$ of our applications.

math.NT↗

Twisted covers and specializations

The central topic is this question: is a given $k$-étale algebra $\prod_lE_l/k$ the specialization of a given $k$-cover $f:X\rightarrow B$ at some point $t_0\in B(k)$? Our main tool is a {\it twisting lemma} that reduces the problem to finding $k$-rational points on a certain $k$-variety. Previous forms of this twisting lemma are generalized and unified. New applications are given: a Grunwald form of Hilbert's irreducibility theorem over number fields, a non-Galois variant of the Tchebotarev theorem for function fields over finite fields, some general specialization properties of covers over PAC or ample fields.

math.NT↗