SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Pierre Denelle

Publications and source records attributed to Pierre Denelle.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Bioregionalization analyses with the bioregion R-package

Bioregionalization consists in the identification of spatial units with similar species composition and is a classical approach in the fields of biogeography and macroecology. The recent emergence of global databases, improvements in computational power, and the development of clustering algorithms coming from the network theory have led to several major updates of the bioregionalizations of many taxa. A typical bioregionalization workflow involves five different steps: formatting the input data, computing a (dis)similarity matrix, selecting a bioregionalization algorithm, evaluating the resulting bioregionalization, and mapping and interpreting the bioregions. For most of these steps, there are many options available in the methods and R packages. Here, we present bioregion, a package that includes all the steps of a bioregionalization workflow under a single architecture, with an exhaustive list of the bioregionalization algorithms used in biogeography and macroecology. These algorithms include (non-)hierarchical algorithms as well as community detection algorithms coming from the network theory. Some key methods from the literature, such as the network community detection algorithm Infomap or OSLOM (Order Statistics Local Optimization Method), that were not available in the R language are included in bioregion. By combining different methods coming from different fields to communicate easily, bioregion will allow a reproducible and complete comparison of the different bioregionalization methods, which is still missing in the literature.

q-bio.QM

Assessing the effect of sample bias correction in species distribution models

Open-source biodiversity databases contain a large amount of species occurrence records, but these are often spatially biased, which affects the reliability of species distribution models based on these records. Sample bias correction techniques include data filtering at the cost of record numbers or require considerable additional sampling effort. However, independent data are rarely available and assessment of the correction technique must rely on performance metrics computed with subsets of the only available (biased) data, which may be misleading. Here we assess the extent to which an acknowledged sample bias correction technique is likely to improve models' ability to predict species distributions in the absence of independent data. We assessed the variation in model predictions induced by the correction and model stochasticity. We present an index of the effect of correction relative to model stochasticity, the Relative Overlap Index (ROI). We tested whether the ROI better represented the effect of correction than classic performance metrics and absolute overlap metrics using 64 vertebrate species and 21 virtual species with a generated sample bias. When based on absolute overlaps and cross-validation performance metrics, we found no effect of correction, except for cAUC. When considering its effect relative to model stochasticity, the effect of correction depended on the site and the species. Virtual species enabled us to verify that the correction actually improved distribution predictions and the biological relevance of the selected variables at the sites with a clear gradient of sample bias, and when species distribution predictors are not correlated with sample bias patterns.

q-bio.PE

Dispersal-based species pools as sources of connectivity area mismatches

Context - Prioritising is likely to differ depending on the species considered for connectivity assessments, leading to a lack of consensual decisions for territorial planning. Objectives - The objective was to assess the relevance of identifying priority areas for connectivity for groups of species based on common dispersal abilities. We aimed to assess the impact of target groups choices on predicted priority areas. Method - The study was located at the Thau Lagoon territory to demonstrate the methodological approach. Ecological niche modelling was used to quantify species resistance and to identify suitable habitat patches. We coupled the least-cost path methodology with circuit theory to assess species connectivity. We classified connectivity from high to low levels and averaged the results by dispersal groups. Results - We found important differences in identified priority areas between groups with dissimilar dispersal abilities, with little overlap between highly connected areas. We identified a gap between the level of protection of low dispersal species and highly connected areas. We found mismatches between existing corridors and connectivity in low dispersal species, and a greater impact in areas of expected urban sprawl projects on favourably connected areas for species with high dispersal capabilities. Conclusion - We have demonstrated that a diversity of dispersal capacity ranges must be accounted for in order to identify ecological corridors in programmes that aim to restore habitat connectivity at territorial levels. Our findings are oriented to support the decisions of planning initiatives, at both local and regional scale.

q-bio.PE